March 13, 2005

70 DAYS TO HALT 200 YEARS OF DECLINE?:

Chirac told: halt France’s decline or forget the EU: With 10 weeks until the French vote on Europe’s constitution, the ‘yes’ camp is losing ground. (Hugh Schofield, 3/13/05, Sunday Herald)

By Friday morning the consensus had settled: the mass movement had exceeded the unions’ hopes. More than one million workers – including many, unusually, in the private sector – had downed tools. The government of President Jacques Chirac, commentators agreed, should be seriously rattled.

Among the regular alphabet soup of union acronyms worn on stickers and baseball caps in Paris on Thursday, two new slogans caught the eye. One group of protesters was adorned with banners proclaiming the unions’ support for the capital’s 2012 Olympic bid: this an attempt to mitigate the harm caused by a public transport shutdown on the very day of the International Olympic Committee inspectors’ visit.

But it must be said that few in France share the predominant British view that the day of strikes will damage the city’s application. Socialist mayor Bertrand Delanoe even said the protests would help the Paris bid, by showing a vibrant democracy in action.

But for Chirac, and his long-suffering prime minister, Jean-Pierre Raffarin, the banners that counted were elsewhere. They were proudly arrayed along a substantial section of the cortege – and though their message flew in the face of the official policy of the opposition socialists and most trade unions, nobody on the march seemed to mind. The words were: Non à la constitution Européenne!

It is 10 weeks until France’s referendum on the EU’s constitution – an electoral rendezvous that leaders across the continent know is crucial for the treaty’s ratification. A victory for the “yes” camp would maintain the momentum set in Spain last month, and give hope to advocates preparing to campaign in Britain next year. But a rejection in France – the historic core of the European Union – would be a disaster.

None would feel the catastrophe of a defeat more than Chirac. He has staked his reputation on showing France to be once again in the vanguard of European construction. Repudiation would consign the past two years of his presidency to limp decline. On the plus side are the coalition of mainstream parties which back his call for a “yes” vote, as well as opinion polls that show some 60% of the public to be in favour of the treaty.

But on the down side – and making Chirac and his government nervous – is a mood of surly discontent on the street.


Until the last Frenchman takes his last breath there will be a mood of surly discontent.

Posted by Orrin Judd at March 13, 2005 11:46 AM
Comments

Its hard to believe that the French will vote against a contraption that is intended to line their pockets, but they could be so POed at Chirac that they will. It should be interesting.

Posted by: Robert Schwartz at March 13, 2005 2:56 PM

If it is defeated, I foresee Chirac's suicide. He couldn't live with himself, seeing his dream fail.

Posted by: Oswald Booth Czologosz at March 13, 2005 7:43 PM

This will be the revolt of the alienated--and what a motley crowd they will be. No red state revolt here. Never mind Chirac, if France votes no, the entire elite structure of Europe will commit suicide. Seriously, they simply won't have a clue what to do.

Posted by: Peter B at March 13, 2005 7:56 PM

. . . if France votes no, the entire elite structure of Europe will commit suicide.

Is that a promise? Where do I go to get my "NON!" buttons, bumper stickers, murals, postcards, neckties, samplers, stained glass windows, tatoos, etc.

Posted by: Mike Morley at March 13, 2005 11:04 PM

"If it is defeated, I foresee Chirac's suicide." No such luck. He will blame bush and announce that if the proles don't vote for it in the second refferendum he is going to make them quit smoking.

If you held his underwater, he would learn how to breath though his toes.

Posted by: Robert Schwartz at March 14, 2005 1:37 AM

If he is ever voted out of office, I am curious to see how Chirac avoids the hoosegow. He is considered slimy, dishonorable and self-dealing even by French standards. The way he is jettisoning old allies, like Juppe', over the side makes for great theatre.

My bet is he will follow Bettino Craxi and set himself up in a mansion on the Tunisian coast.

Posted by: Bart at March 14, 2005 9:35 AM

Euroskeptics in Britain gleefully anticipate how a French "No" will affect the British vote.

Posted by: Chris Durnell at March 14, 2005 11:01 AM
« PRECEDENCE: | Main | THANKS, KEN: »