February 25, 2005

WE'VE GOT AN OPENING IN AUGUST...:

'U.S. will get Syria out by May': Former Lebanese PM says war in Iraq will allow his country to be free (Aaron Klein, February 25, 2005, WorldNetDaily.com)

The U.S. led war against terrorism and its advances in Iraq and Afghanistan have enhanced the climate in the Middle East and will enable the international community to force Syria to withdraw its troops from Lebanon likely by May, former Lebanese Prime Minister Michel Aoun told WorldNetDaily today in an exclusive interview.

"The U.S. and EU are backing us in our movement to free Lebanon," said Aoun, speaking to WND from France. "They are interfering through diplomacy and threats of sanctions, and the situation is such today that Syria must comply. If the U.S. and Europe follow through, Syria will be obliged to withdraw before Lebanese elections in May."


Just in time for the June strikes on Iran that Seymour Hersh is predicting. Looks like Kim Jong-il gets his in July.

Posted by Orrin Judd at February 25, 2005 2:49 PM
Comments

Next year in Jerusalem.

Posted by: Robert Schwartz at February 25, 2005 2:59 PM

just think how much better things would be going, around the world, if only gwb had listened to john kerry and implemented the Kerry doctorine. guffaw. everything kerry does reminds me of a zoo monkey pleasuring himself for the amusement of the zoo visitors.

Posted by: cjm at February 25, 2005 3:37 PM

And when children 20 years from now ask me, "What were you doing in the great year 2005?", I'll have to tell them, "Telephone inventories in Massachusetts."

Posted by: Bob Hawkins at February 25, 2005 3:41 PM

I originally thought it said US will get out of Syria by May and thought what does he know that we don't?

Posted by: Sandy P at February 25, 2005 3:50 PM

If you buy into the theory that success on the foreign policy front will increase Bush's political capital that he can then spend on domestic issues (like SS reform) improvement in Syria and Iran would definitely help.

Posted by: AWW at February 25, 2005 4:27 PM

Ah, OJ, if only it were true, but I fear not. I suspect the Iraq situation has been tougher than planned, and so we just don't have the extra troops for such things at the moment. We could try decapitation strikes, but would that work in Syria or NK, or would the regimes just promote some other high-level baddies and carry on as before? And a military strike at Iran might well rally the largely pro-American populace around the regime. I think we have to play a diplomacy plus special ops game for the time being.

Posted by: PapayaSF at February 25, 2005 4:28 PM

We may not be able to occupy Syria, but we darn sure can get them out of Lebanon. Surgical strikes may not give Syria a democracy, but the threat of them may make Assad back down.

Posted by: John Thacker at February 25, 2005 4:35 PM

we can destroy the troop concentrations in the bekka valley, or at least disperse them to the point where they can be picked off by special ops forces (or local militias). we don't have to invade syria and probably never will; we just need to disrupt asswad's hold on power enough that the country falls into chaos or even revolution. my understanding is that the allawite clan could very well be exterminated in such a situation.

hmmmm, i wonder if anyone is proposing that the iraqi sunnis move into syria after the fall of the allawites ? just wondering is all.

Posted by: cjm at February 25, 2005 4:39 PM

Papaya:

Where are the 150,000 guys there going to go now that we're done?

Posted by: oj at February 25, 2005 4:42 PM

Let's make sure the job is done in Iraq and Afghanistan before we move on elsewhere. If we only need a token force in each country, then we can take action against the Syrians.

The notion that once the Syrians left Lebanon that everyone would start behaving like civilized human beings is laughable. As a prerequisite, the so-called 'Palestinians' should be moved en masse to Gaza or the PLO controlled sections of Judea and Samaria before any action against the Syrians is undertaken in Lebanon.

Posted by: Bart at February 25, 2005 5:42 PM

OJ:

As much as I would like them to leave via Damascus and Beirut, I don't think they'll be leaving Iraq in the next few months, and when they do they'll bring 'em home for a rest. Lots are Guard troops, and it's a lot to ask to keep them away from home for years at a time.

Posted by: PapayaSF at February 25, 2005 5:52 PM

Papaya:

But the lesson of Iraq is that these peoples are ready to rule themselves. Dispose of the dictator and leave.

Posted by: oj at February 25, 2005 5:58 PM

Mmmmm, maybe. But the good people of Iraq were pretty much disarmed, disorganized, and somewhat cowed. The Baathists could well have regained control without the occupation. Knocking off an entrenched dictatorial regime and then standing back to see what emerges would be an interesting experiment, but the stakes are high, and it'd be bad news for the good guys if it went bad. We don't want a rerun of the aftermath of Iraq War I.

Posted by: PapayaSF at February 25, 2005 8:39 PM

Papaya:

No they aren't. If we don't like the next regime we knock it off too.

Posted by: oj at February 26, 2005 1:49 AM
« WHITE FLIGHT: | Main | BETTER CHECK THE SMOKE DETECTORS (via The Other Brother): »