February 4, 2005
WE’VE COME A LONG WAY SINCE “MEAN JOE”
Super Bowl commercials fall foul of Janet Jackson factor
(David Litterick, The Telegraph, February 4th, 2005)
The new moral Puritanism inspired by Janet Jackson's "wardrobe malfunction" at last year's Super Bowl football championship, when the singer bared her breast, means the most interesting adverts this year are the ones viewers won't be able to see.Competition for the 30-second advertising slots is fierce, with companies paying up to $2.4m for the privilege of reaching up to 145m viewers during this Sunday's showdown – twice as much as a decade ago.
In recent years Super Bowl sponsors have sought to create a stir – winning millions of dollars of free publicity in the process. But this year Madison Avenue, where most of New York's advertising agencies are based, has become increasingly sensitive to criticism, particularly after previous Super Bowl ads depicting a flatulent horse and a crotch-biting dog were dismissed as vulgar.
Budweiser's brewer Anheuser Busch has pulled an ad that poked fun at last year's half-time show, while cold remedy Airborne, which had planned an ad featuring a few seconds of 84-year-old Mickey Rooney's bottom, fell foul of the National Football League and Fox, the network that carries the game.
The soi-disant cultural elites are having some grand old guffaws with this one, some of them half-amusing. Unfortunately, their smugness keeps them from asking themselves how they ever regressed to the point where they think a flatulent horse, a crotch-biting dog or Mickey Rooney’s naked bum are clever or interesting.
Just keeping one's clothes on in front of children now makes one a 'moral puritan'?
Surely thou jest!
Posted by: Noel at February 4, 2005 8:35 AMAll humor is Conservative.
Posted by: h-man at February 4, 2005 8:49 AMWhen you define deviancy down, what becomes sophisticated goes down with it.
Posted by: Raoul Ortega at February 4, 2005 12:26 PM"...how they ever regressed to the point where they think a flatulent horse, a crotch-biting dog or Mickey Rooneys naked bum are clever or interesting."
Who said they were? Who said they were anything other than the basest sort of humor? And are you trying to tell us that the fart joke has never been performed that might have elicited a chuckle or two from you?
Posted by: M. Bulger at February 4, 2005 4:22 PMThe purpose of advertising is to encourage people to buy items they otherwise would not buy. Everything else is masturbation.
Posted by: Bart at February 4, 2005 8:29 PMM.
First line of the article.
Of course I have, but off-colour, sacrilegious or prurient humour is usually funny only because it is unacceptable in public and carries a whiff of the illicit with it. Once it is wide open, it just becomes stupid and offensive. Are you suggesting that if a teacher hears a really good fart joke he should tell it to his grade four class? Maybe Bush should have put one in his Inaugural address.
Posted by: Peter B at February 5, 2005 6:33 AM