February 19, 2005

WE, THE BUREAUCRATS OF THE EUROPEAN UNION...

Why the EU Constitution is bad for Britain and bad for the US (Charles Moore, The Telegraph, February 19th, 2005)

It is natural for Americans to like the sound of the word "constitution". They have the best one ever written in a single document. It consists, in the copy I have before me, of 12 pages, 11 if you exclude the list of the men who signed it. There are also amendments added over the past two centuries: they amount to another nine pages. If President Bush tucked himself up with it at his famously early bedtime of 9.30, he could finish it well before 10.

I should be surprised if the State Department, the Washington faction keenest on turning Mr Bush into a Euro-enthusiast, has encouraged him to go to bed with a copy of the European Constitution. My copy, published by TSO (note that the former name Her Majesty's Stationery Office has quietly been relegated), is 511 pages long. I do not claim it would keep Mr Bush up all night – in fact, I guarantee that, if he tried to read it, he would still be asleep by 10 – but it would wake him and the First Lady up with a start as it slipped from his nerveless hands and crashed, all 2lb 8oz of it, on the floor.

If he did spend 20 minutes with the document, however, the President would see that it was not what is normally meant by a constitution. Rather than confining itself to the division of powers by which a country should be governed – head of state, parliament, judiciary, what's local and what's national – it lays out scores of pages telling people how to run their lives. It supports positive discrimination, outlaws the death penalty in all circumstances, commits itself to high public spending, compulsory consultation with trade unions about changes at work, "the exchange of youth workers", "fat-free breakfasts", "distance education" and "the physical and moral integrity of sportsmen and sportswomen" (I made one of these up). And it imposes all these on nations that have their own governments and electorates.

It also contains a great bundle of miscellaneous provisions about such things as abortion in Malta, "Hot Rolling Mills Nos 1 and 2" for a steel company in the Czech Republic, some rather frightening-looking stuff about the nuclear power plant in Slovakia and "the right to provide services by natural persons who do not enjoy hembygdsrätt/kotiseutuoikeus (regional citizenship) in Åland". This is not a constitution, certainly not a constitution intended to be understood by those it affects. It is a vast agglomeration of decisions made by governments to take power over citizens of vastly differing countries.


Posted by Peter Burnet at February 19, 2005 9:46 AM
Comments

> My copy, published by TSO (note that the former name Her Majesty's Stationery Office has quietly been relegated), is 511 pages long

511 is just one short of 2 ^ 9. And what is nine twos but... three sixes! Look for the EU to add another page before all is said and done.

What? Fine, go ahead, ignore the warning! See where it gets you!

Posted by: Guy T. at February 19, 2005 11:34 AM

James Lileks:

The EU Constitution will, it seems, at least as I read Article 24: “(Children) may express their views freely.” And these views “shall be taken into consideration on matters which concern them, in accordance with their age and maturity.” I WANT CANDY is now a Constitutional issue. I exaggerate of course, but the EU Constitution gives me the creeps. The more specific the set of rights, the easier it is to deny all others, and infringe on the rights your Eurobetters kindly deign to grant.

Alas I haven’t the space to draw all the parallels with the 1977 Soviet Constitution, which I have right before me now. It’s a masterpiece of high-minded hypocrisy, and there are so many passages that mirror the EU Constitution - which of course proves nothing. But one does get the impression that in either case it’s the state granting the rights, not acknowledging that you have these rights already and that the state shall promise to get out of the way. Small, tiny, minor point. Almost too small to mention.

Posted by: Gideon at February 19, 2005 8:14 PM
« NO TEST, NO ESTABLISHMENT, OTHER THAN THAT...: | Main | LIKE THE SPEECH? SUPPORT THE POLICY: »