February 16, 2005

THEY MAY AS WELL EXERT INFLUENCE WHILE THERE ARE STILL OVER 40 OF THEM:

Bush Combs Senate for Friendly Democrats (CHRISTOPHER COOPER, February 16, 2005, THE WALL STREET JOURNAL)

[W]hite House lobbyists estimate that as many as a third of the 44 Democratic senators will provide occasional assistance on issues such as energy, judicial nominations, tax-code overhaul and perhaps even Social Security. Since Republicans need 60 votes to overcome Democratic filibusters, and have just 55 of their own, winning converts isn't optional.

Some are good prospects for the White House because of their ideological orientation. Hawkish Sen. Joseph Lieberman of Connecticut, though he spent part of 2004 bashing the White House during his unsuccessful bid for the Democratic presidential nomination, has backed Mr. Bush at important moments on national security.

Others are propelled toward cooperation by constituent interests. On energy legislation, for instance, the administration hopes for help from Democrats representing energy-producing states, such as Mary Landrieu of Louisiana and Robert Byrd of West Virginia.

Perhaps most important for the White House are those Democrats who must cope with broad home-state support for Mr. Bush. Five Democratic senators -- Ben Nelson of Nebraska, Kent Conrad and Byron Dorgan of North Dakota, Tim Johnson of South Dakota and Evan Bayh of Indiana -- represent states that Mr. Bush carried with at least 60% of the vote in November. Messrs. Nelson and Conrad are up for re-election in 2006.

Democrats from decidedly "red," or pro-Bush, states have been the focus of the president's public lobbying on Social Security. Mr. Conrad was aboard Air Force One for the president's recent trip to North Dakota for a town meeting on the issue.

"The president made an earnest attempt to win [Mr. Conrad] over on Social Security," says Conrad spokesman Chris Thorne. Mr. Conrad has said there is "a kernel of a good idea" in the president's plan. But he dislikes the idea of large-scale borrowing to finance a transition to private accounts, and there is no indication yet he is preparing to sign on.



What got into Joe Biden?

Posted by Orrin Judd at February 16, 2005 10:01 AM
Comments

One wonders what is the source of the data in the Table. The writer seriously doubts that Feingold, Clinton, and Biden supported the Bush administration over sixty percent of the time on issues of substance.

Posted by: Earl Sutherland at February 16, 2005 11:47 AM

Feingold is a presidential candidate???

The premise of the article is that Bush needs 60 votes to pass anything. This is only true if the Dems filibuster, if they don't you only need 50 (Cheney breaks a tie). The RINOs will defect on some issues but as long as Bush can get things up for a vote he should be ok.

Posted by: AWW at February 16, 2005 12:05 PM

I'll bet Biden forgot how to distinguish between the 'yes' and 'no' buttons.

Posted by: ratbert at February 16, 2005 4:01 PM
« ISN'T THAT CONVENIENT: | Main | COMMENCE THE DEMOCRATIC HOWLS OF OUTRAGE: »