February 25, 2005
NEED HELP RELOADING THAT GUN?:
The Online Insurgency: MoveOn has become a force to be reckoned with (TIM DICKINSON, Rolling Stone)
They signed up 500,000 supporters with an Internet petition -- but Bill Clinton still got impeached. They organized 6,000 candlelight vigils worldwide -- but the U.S. still invaded Iraq. They raised $60 million from 500,000 donors to air countless ads and get out the vote in the battle-ground states -- but George Bush still whupped John Kerry. A gambler with a string of bets this bad might call it a night. But MoveOn.org just keeps doubling down.Now that Howard Dean has been named chair of the Democratic National Committee -- an ascension that MoveOn helped to engineer -- the Internet activist group is placing another high-stakes wager. It's betting that its 3 million grass-roots revolutionaries can seize the reins of the party and establish the group as a lasting political force. "It's our Party," MoveOn's twenty-four-year-old executive director, Eli Pariser, declared in an e-mail. "We bought it, we own it and we're going to take it back." [...]
So who is MoveOn? Consider this: Howard Dean finished first in the MoveOn primary. Number Two wasn't John Kerry or John Edwards -- it was Dennis Kucinich. Listing the issues that resonate most with their membership, Boyd and Blades cite the environment, the Iraq War, campaign-finance reform, media reform, voting reform and corporate reform. Somewhere after freedom, opportunity and responsibility comes "the overlay of security concerns that everybody shares." Terrorism as a specific concern is notably absent. As are jobs. As is health care. As is education.
There's nothing inherently good or bad in any of this. It's just that MoveOn's values aren't middle-American values. They're the values of an educated, steadily employed middle and upper-middle class with time to dedicate to politics -- and disposable income to leverage when they're agitated. That's fine, as long as the group sticks to mobilizing fellow travelers on the left. But the risks are greater when it presumes to speak for the entire party. "The decibel level that MoveOn can bring is very high," says Bill Carrick, a longtime Democratic strategist.
Like so many other Internet start-ups, MoveOn has raised -- and burned through -- tens of millions of dollars, innovating without producing many concrete results. Any reasonable analysis shows its stock may be dangerously overvalued. Those banking on MoveOn had better hope it is more Google than Pets.com. Because should the group flame out, the Democrats could be in for a fall of Nasdaq proportions.
Here's the most obvious question that the suicidal path of the Democratic Party raise: is there no adult supervision? Posted by Orrin Judd at February 25, 2005 12:48 PM
There ought to be a hint of self-awareness here by the MoveOn folks that when your organization is labeled both clueless and immature Rolling Stone magazine, there's a bit of a problem with your message and messingers.
Posted by: John at February 25, 2005 2:22 PMIn a cave deep somewhere beneath Gotham City, Karl Rove cackles maniacally. His villainous plan is unfolding like clockwork.
Posted by: Robert Schwartz at February 25, 2005 3:08 PMMr. Judd;
If they were really adults, would they be members of the modern Democratic Party at all?
Posted by: Annoying Old Guy at February 25, 2005 3:28 PM"is there no adult supervision?" Check the ages of Eli Pariser, Oliver Willis, Matthew Yglesias. No there isn't. They will stay forever young.
Posted by: AllenS at February 25, 2005 4:00 PM"The decibel level that MoveOn can bring is very high," says Bill Carrick, a longtime Democratic strategist.
Hah! Left-handed Compliment of the Week Award! Want to bet he was actually thinking: "If these jerks don't shut up, we'll never win."
Posted by: PapayaSF at February 25, 2005 4:33 PMIf a group of wealthy Satan worshippers presented the Democrats with a lot of money to run campaigns with, would the Dems embrace them? It would seem so.
Posted by: Bart at February 25, 2005 6:02 PM"What did you think," the lawyer asked the trainwreck eyewitness, "when you saw the two trrains hurtling toward each other on the same track?" "I thought," he replied, "that it was a hell of a way to run a railroad."
All jokes aside, we should be hard put to avoid the notion that Rovian agents provocateur are steering the Left as one would a radio-controlled model airplane, the sorry sots being so blinded by their shameful lusts that they are powerless to pull themselves out of their destructive spiral.
Posted by: Lou Gots at February 25, 2005 7:40 PMTake the money out the party, and outsiders will take the party. The legacy of McCain-Feingold.
Posted by: Gideon at February 25, 2005 9:32 PMGideon: That was always the issue with McCain-Feingold. On the one hand, plainly unconstitutional. On the other hand, wildly popular and the death-knell of the Democratic Party. I'm not thrilled that W signed it, but I certainly understand why he signed it.
Posted by: David Cohen at February 26, 2005 12:53 AMGideon:
I really dislike McCain-Feingold, but I've got one hell of a smile on my face because this is exactly what I thought would happen to the Dems after they spent so much time promoting c.f. reform.
Posted by: Matt Murphy at February 26, 2005 1:50 AM