February 20, 2005

GALILEO BLESS ME:

SELLING SCIENTIFIC PROMISE: A desperate injection of stem cells and hope (Alan Zarembo, February 20, 2005, LA Times)

Tom Hill was just the type of patient BioMark was looking for.

The company was launched in the summer of 2002, less than a year before Tom found its website. It began small, in a rented condominium shared by its founders, Laura Brown and Steve van Rooyen, just a few miles from Tom's house.

At first, the company survived patient to patient, each paying as much as $21,000 per treatment.

Word was spreading. It was a good time for a stem cell business.

The once exotic science was in the news almost daily. In August 2001, President Bush allotted federal funds for stem cell research but said they could not be spent on the study and development of new lines of cells from human embryos. It was a compromise to address the concerns of religious conservatives and others who opposed any destruction of human embryos.

The restrictions came under attack from high-profile figures, including former First Lady Nancy Reagan and actor Christopher Reeve, fomenting a national debate that turned "stem cell" into a household term.

Reports of each new scientific advance circulated rapidly — in the media and on Internet message boards for people with incurable diseases. Stem cell clinics began popping up in China, Ukraine, Barbados and other places.

Brown and Van Rooyen built their business on the idea that science had already proved the therapeutic power of stem cells. BioMark was simply making it available to the world.

The company had a scientific advisory board, a professional-looking website and doctors to administer the therapy in Atlanta.

"When something this powerful, this beautiful, is laid in your hands, in your path, you give everything you have to it," Brown said in an interview with The Times last fall.

At least 220 patients had received BioMark injections, she said.

The therapy, as advertised, was simple: an injection of 1.5 million stem cells in the abdomen. Everybody got the same type of cells, regardless of their disease.

"Once in the body, cells migrate to the site of the disease and begin producing the needed cells," explained a BioMark information packet.

BioMark cells, Brown told patients, were free from the "right-to-life issues" slowing the development of stem cell cures in the U.S. The cells did not come from embryos, but from blood harvested from umbilical cords after childbirth.

One BioMark brochure carried a disclaimer that the treatment was not approved by the Food and Drug Administration.

But some patients saw that as a badge of honor. Someone was working to help them, even if that help ran afoul of the government.

It infuriated Tom that politics had trumped science.

"People suffering from disease are told they have to wait for their cures," he wrote in a letter to his U.S. senators. "Many of these patients do not have time to wait and a research delay could be a death sentence."

Tom created a website to protest the federal restrictions. After 25 years as a Republican, he renounced his party membership.

He told Valerie about BioMark and instructed her not to tell his doctors.

She didn't know what to make of all this. She had never heard of anyone being cured of ALS, and she gingerly questioned his plan.

Tom stabbed at the keys on his voice synthesizer. An electronic retort pulsed back at her: "I've done a lot of research."

He felt sure: This was science.


How would people develop such delusions? This kind of mumbo-jumbo doesn't help: "If we do the work that we can do in this country, the work that we will do when John Kerry is president, people like Christopher Reeve are going to walk, get up out of that wheelchair and walk again."

Posted by Orrin Judd at February 20, 2005 9:03 AM
Comments

You left out the punch line: the treatment was bogus, Bio-Mark is under investigation by the FDA for fraud, and Tom died.

Posted by: Mike Morley at February 20, 2005 9:18 AM

Lysenko and P.T. Barnum are back.

Posted by: ratbert at February 20, 2005 9:29 AM

rat:

When did they leave?

Posted by: oj at February 20, 2005 10:00 AM

why don't these patent medicine peddlers just claim to have an unlimited supply of embryonic cells and get on with fleecing, i mean curing, their marks, i mean patients ? its not as if one way of making a placebo is better than another -- its all in the hand waving anyway.

Posted by: cjm at February 20, 2005 12:40 PM

This guy from Uganda keeps writing personal emails to me. He offers some great deals.

Posted by: Genecis at February 20, 2005 3:30 PM

Better than Nigeria?

Posted by: ratbert at February 20, 2005 11:08 PM

What's more, his dealings didn't have anything to do with the "politics of stem cells" whatsoever. There are no limits on umbilical stem cell research. Republicans like that sort of research. They're just not big fans of, you know, making up crap.

Posted by: Timothy at February 21, 2005 1:22 AM

I receive similar emails from Belize.

Posted by: Dave W. at February 21, 2005 1:27 AM

Just curious, Orrin. Assume you're with Pasteur just before he began his rabies treatment the first time, knowing only what he (and everybody else) knew.

Go or no go?

Posted by: Harry Eagar at February 21, 2005 5:42 PM

Harry:

I'd have told Dr. Megele to have fun if he'd restricted his experiments to dogs.

Posted by: oj at February 21, 2005 5:49 PM

Pasteur wasn't treating a dog. Please be serious.

Posted by: Harry Eagar at February 22, 2005 5:11 PM

He experimented on dogs. You want to experiment on humans.

Posted by: oj at February 22, 2005 5:23 PM

Edward Jenner is a better example. Or even Christaan Barnard.

Posted by: jim hamlen at February 23, 2005 4:50 PM
« SECURITY ISN'T WORTH LIBERTY: | Main | HOW DO YOU SAY DIA DE LOS MUERTES IN FRENCH?: »