February 16, 2005
FERTILE SOIL THAT SHI'A CRESCENT:
The ramifications of Hariri's assassination (Rami G. Khouri, February 16, 2005, Lebanon Daily Star)
The events of Monday have unleashed political forces that could transform both Lebanon and, via the Syrian connection, other parts of the Middle East. The already intense backlash to the assassination may lead to an accelerated Syrian withdrawal from Lebanon, and faster reform movements inside both Lebanon and Syria.The fact that within just hours of the murder five distinct parties were singled out as possible culprits - Israel, Syria, Lebanese regime partisans, mafia-style gangs, and anti-Saudi, anti-U.S. Islamist terrorists - also points to the wider dilemma that disfigures Lebanese and Arab political culture in general: the resort to murderous and destabilizing violence as a chronic option for those who vie for power, whether as respectable government officials, established local warlords, or freelance political thugs.
The madness is not just in the murder of a fine man and a true Lebanese and Arab patriot; it is in the ongoing legacy of rampant and often brutal political violence that at once defines, disfigures and demeans political elites and perhaps even Arab society as a whole. That madness has now been even more deeply institutionalized and anchored in the modern history of this region due to the impact of the American-British invasion of Iraq and the new wave of violence it has spurred. One of the reasons why the Lebanese-Syrian relationship has become increasingly contentious in the past year is the consequence of American pressure on Syria to be more cooperative on Iraq. The circle of violence that engulfs the Middle East is as vast and intertwined as it is senselessly destructive.
But this murder was not primarily about our wider Arab dilemma. Regardless of who carried it out, the murder and its fallout have focused attention on a tortured Lebanese-Syrian relationship that is problematic in its own right, and that has become the crucible for testing new forms of American and Western political intervention in the Arab world.
It was not at all surprising that opposition forces in Lebanon quickly came together and openly pinned responsibility for the assassination on Syria and its allied Lebanese government. For the most significant political development in Lebanon in recent months, in my view, has been the Lebanese opposition's coalescing around an increasingly clear and sharp rejection of Syria's military presence in the country and its political interference in domestic Lebanese affairs. This position became more focused and vocal last autumn after the Syrian-backed extension of Lebanese President Emile Lahoud's term by an additional three years. American-French diplomatic pressure on Syria and the passage of UN Security Council Resolution 1559 demanding Syrian withdrawal from Lebanon are all part of that same thrust.
Fortunate, eh, that the President and Congress had already prepared the ground. Now get ready for the spate of stories about how surprisingly quickly Hezbollah becomes just another political party. Posted by Orrin Judd at February 16, 2005 11:11 AM
Given the prevailing cluelessness of the professor-pundit-presser claque about what W is doing and how it is playing out, do you get the sense that they are actually trying to repeat their deer-in-the-headlights act before the USSR imploded?
Posted by: Luciferous at February 16, 2005 3:41 PMWell, it may prove to have been worse than a crime, a mistake, if done by the Syrians, who almost certainly did do it.
But obviously they didn't intend it to come out that way, which means Orrin has to junk all those posts about Assad bein' so afeered.
Desperate, perhaps. Not afraid, though.
Posted by: Harry Eagar at February 17, 2005 1:07 AMNot afraid of France and likely not in control of his own security services.
But it was jihadists who most likely did the bombing, and it was aimed at the Sa'uds.
Posted by: oj at February 17, 2005 7:10 AM