February 17, 2005
AND AFTER ALL, WHO WANTS MORAL VALUES:
Casting a Chill on the Pill: The nation's largest pharmacy chain brings moral values to Minnesota (Bridgette Reinsmoen, 2/16/05, City Pages)
A year ago, a rape victim in Denton, Texas, went to an Eckerd drugstore to fill a prescription for emergency contraception, sometimes known as the "morning after pill." When taken within 72 hours of intercourse, the drug prevents conception. At the counter of the drugstore, however, the woman got an unpleasant surprise: The pharmacist on duty, Gene Herr, declared that it was against his moral beliefs to dispense the drug.Herr later told the Associated Press that he had refused to fill similar prescriptions five or six times in the past. But, Herr added, this was the first time he'd been handed such a prescription for a rape victim. "I went in the back room and briefly prayed about it," he explained. Apparently, God said no. Herr's two co-workers also refused to fill the prescription, and the rape victim was left to find another pharmacy.
The Eckerd employees involved in the Denton case were all eventually fired. However, the story doesn't end there. It turns out that the nation's largest pharmacy chain, the CVS Corporation, has instituted a policy tailor-made for employees like Herr. Under the rule, CVS pharmacists can refuse to fill prescriptions on the basis of "deeply held personal beliefs."
In a separate case last March, a married mother of two was denied her prescription for regular birth control pills by a CVS pharmacist in Texas.
There have been no reported incidents of pharmacists refusing to fill prescriptions in Minnesota to date. But the tales from Texas, and a similar incident closer to home in Madison, Wisconsin, have raised concern among many local women's rights advocates--especially given the fast-growing chain's expanding presence in Minnesota. (Little more than a year ago, there was not a single CVS store in Minnesota. Now there are nine and more on the way.)
According to Tina Smith, vice president of external affairs at Planned Parenthood Minnesota/South Dakota, there are no federal laws addressing the issue of "refusal clauses"--or, as proponents call them, "conscience clauses." But there is movement afoot on the state level. Several states, including South Dakota, have recently enacted legislation allowing pharmacists to refuse to dispense any medication on "moral grounds." While no such legislation has been introduced in Minnesota, according to Smith, there is nothing on the books to prevent companies from enacting their own refusal clauses.
Fitting that abortion, which was imposed on America from the top down, has been fought from the ground up. Posted by Orrin Judd at February 17, 2005 3:34 PM
Is it also fitting that married women are denied birth control pills?
Shades of Chik-Fil-A.
Posted by: Harry Eagar at February 17, 2005 8:04 PM> Shades of Chik-Fil-A.
It seems only reasonable that if the Unknown Soldier can have an eternal flame, the Unknown Airline Traveler should at least get some eternal overhead fluorescents. Can we really say that one sacrifice is greater than the other?
Posted by: Guy T. at February 17, 2005 8:45 PMDon't most states offer rape victims morning-after pills as a precaution?
Posted by: Ben Lange at February 17, 2005 11:21 PMFirst they took away my chicken sandwich...and I said nothing.
Posted by: Peter B at February 18, 2005 6:28 AMWhat is so terrible about allowing vendors to decide what products they will sell? If you can't get your morning after pill at Pharmacy A, I'm sure Pharmacy B will sell it to you.
Posted by: Bart at February 18, 2005 10:19 AMif the anti-abortion activists were really serious about ending abortion, they would quit trying to piggy-back it with sex-ed and birth control. but of course they are just as fanatical as the other side and just as unscrupulous. for the record i am against abortion, but for birth control.
Posted by: cjm at February 18, 2005 5:51 PMCatholics activists are anti-birth control, but fundamentalist Christians support it. I even went to a lecture by Jerry Falwell where he specifically endorsed the use of contraception. He'd prefer abstinence of course, but contraception is preferable to abortion.
Opposition to what passes for 'sex-ed' crosses all political and religious boundaries. If they teach sex as well as they teach grammar, spelling and math, the species is doomed.
Posted by: Bart at February 18, 2005 6:29 PMLeftists are worried because someday they plan for there to be only one pharmacy.
Posted by: Joseph Hertzlinger at February 20, 2005 3:06 AM