January 7, 2005

WE SHOULD CERTAINLY INVITE THEIR LEADERSHIP TO COME NEGOTIATE:

Should We Make a Treaty with al Qaeda?: The opposition to Alberto Gonzales seems to think so. (Andrew C. McCarthy, January 05, 2005, National Review)

Since the early 1990s, al Qaeda has, at the very least, killed American soldiers and desecrated their remains in Somalia; urged the murder of all Americans — civilians and military alike — wherever on the globe they may be found; conducted simultaneous sneak attacks on the American embassies in Kenya and Tanzania, resulting in the mass murder of over 240 civilians (the vast majority of them Muslims and non-Americans); killed 17 American seamen in an attempt to blow up the destroyer, the U.S.S. Cole; murdered 3,000 Americans in hijack attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon; and spearheaded guerrilla wars in Afghanistan and Iraq that have killed well over a thousand American military personnel and countless civilians.

In addition to killing civilians in sneak attacks — commonly, detonating bombs within nondescript cars parked or driven in broad daylight in densely populated areas — they also secrete themselves among their once and future victims. They wear no distinguishing insignia to segregate themselves as a militia. They use mosques and schools and hospitals to plan and store weaponry. They feign surrender and then open fire on unsuspecting coalition forces attempting the civilized act of detaining, rather than shooting, them. As for treatment of their own detainees, their practice ranges from execution-style homicide to beastly beheading — usually captured on film and circulated on the Internet to buck up the other savages while scaring the living hell out of everyone else.

So here's an idea: Let's make a treaty with them.

Let's reward this behavior with a grant of honorable-combatant status. Let's give them the same kind of benefits the Geneva Conventions reserve for soldiers who play by the rules: who identify themselves as soldiers; who don't intentionally murder civilians; who do not threaten schools, hospitals, and houses of worship by turning them into military targets; who grant quarter honorably; and who treat their captives with dignity and respect. Let's provide al Qaeda with "amenities such as dormitories, kitchenettes, sports equipment, canteens, and a monthly pay allowance in Swiss francs" — the Geneva prescriptions for POWs that Lee A. Casey and David Rivkin Jr. outline with characteristic clarity in the current issue of National Review.

Of course, we'll have to find someone from al Qaeda able to sign the treaty.


Have American POWs received Geneva Convention treatment in any war since 1950?

Posted by Orrin Judd at January 7, 2005 12:05 PM
Comments

No.

Posted by: Bob at January 7, 2005 12:10 PM

I'll go with Bob.

No.

Posted by: Jeff Guinn at January 7, 2005 12:22 PM

Yes.

But Al Qaeda's leadership, including Osama, must come to DC for the signing...

Posted by: Moe from NC at January 7, 2005 12:51 PM

I suppose the left has some sort of idea that all American POWs would have to fear in an al Qaida prison camp is being visited by Jane Fonda in a burka.

Posted by: John at January 7, 2005 3:00 PM

Americans didn't receive it during WWII either.

Posted by: Bart at January 7, 2005 4:05 PM

Abu Grahib was hazing and the Geneva convention is a joke. Outside of the MSM and the Democrat blowdrys does anybody give a good #$%^##$%^& what happens to the pondscum we pick up in the GWOT?

Posted by: Robert Schwartz at January 7, 2005 10:11 PM
« MR. DEEDS: | Main | MECHANICAL BULL: »