January 21, 2005
UNTIL IT AFFECTS ME:
A.C.L.U. Will Consider Disciplining 2 Officials (STEPHANIE STROM, 1/21/05, NY Times)
The American Civil Liberties Union, which since its inception has fought to protect free speech rights, is scheduled to begin a debate today over whether to discipline - or potentially move to oust - two board members for speaking to reporters. [...]In a Dec. 28 letter, Catherine S. Travis, a lawyer who sits on the board of the A.C.L.U. affiliate in Oregon, recommended that the board consider suspending or removing Mr. Meyers and Ms. Kaminer, saying that they had violated their fiduciary responsibilities by talking to reporters about matters she called confidential.
"Appropriate corrective action must be taken now to avoid further incidents that can only impede the organization's ability to meet the unprecedented challenges to civil liberties we face at this critical juncture," Ms. Travis wrote.
Ms. Kaminer and Mr. Meyers began pressing for more information about certain practices last summer. Their pressure led to the disclosure that the organization had signed an agreement that obliged it to check its employees' names against government terrorist watch lists, the type of lists it has decried. They also discovered that Mr. Romero advised the Ford Foundation, his former employer, to use the language of the USA Patriot Act, which the organization is fighting, in its grant agreements.
Most recently, the dissident board members have criticized Mr. Romero's decision to do more extensive research on A.C.L.U. donors and members without fully informing the board what data would be obtained by whom. They say they were concerned that the organization is engaging in the same kind of research that it has contested as a violation of privacy when done by government agencies and corporations.
"They are going after the critics instead of the criticism, and I think that's a gross embarrassment and shameful for the A.C.L.U.," Ms. Kaminer said in an interview.
It's a useful reminder that no one actually believes in free speech. Posted by Orrin Judd at January 21, 2005 8:33 AM
"...the organization's ability to meet the unprecedented challenges to civil liberties we face at this critical juncture."
Even while defending themselves, they take a shot at the current Administration. Nice.
Posted by: Bruce Cleaver at January 21, 2005 8:48 AMThe Atheist Communist Libertine Union has got to go!
Posted by: Vince at January 21, 2005 5:28 PM