January 4, 2005

UNINTENDED? THEY HAD SEX DIDN'T THEY?:

More Women Opting Against Birth Control, Study Finds (Ceci Connolly, January 4, 2005, Washington Post)

At a time when the medical community has been heartened by a decline in risky sexual behavior by teenagers, a different problem has crept up: More adult women are forgoing birth control, a trend that has experts puzzled -- and alarmed about a potential rise in unintended pregnancies.

Buried in the government's latest in-depth analysis of contraceptive use was the finding that the number of women who had sex in the previous three months but did not use birth control rose from 5.2 percent in 1995 to 7.4 percent in 2002. That means that as many as 11 percent of all women are at risk of unintended pregnancy at some point during their childbearing years (ages 15 to 44). [...]

The data come from one-on-one interviews with 12,500 women and men ages 15 to 44. Government interviewers, who spent an average of 85 minutes with each person, found that 98 percent of women reported using contraception during their reproductive years, and the pill was the most popular choice, followed by female sterilization -- usually by having their fallopian tubes tied. Female respondents were also asked about their partners' use of birth control methods, such as condoms.

The December report did not tabulate unintended pregnancies, though preliminary information from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention found a slight increase in the birth rate in 2003, most notably in women older than 30.

Physicians, statisticians and advocates who specialize in reproductive health had several theories for the rise in unprotected sex. They pointed to possible factors such as gaps in sex education, the cost of birth control, declining insurance coverage, fears of possible side effects of contraceptives and personal attitudes about childbearing.


You know, you try so hard to instill a Culture of Death and Americans keep choosing life...

Posted by Orrin Judd at January 4, 2005 8:56 PM
Comments

Perhaps the 'unintended' pregnancies are intended? Just a guess.

Posted by: Fred Jacobsen (San Fran) at January 5, 2005 1:32 AM

Just as speeding does not imply you want a car accident, having sex does not necessarily imply aiming for a pregnancy. Given the increased birthrate for the 30+ age group, it may be the pregnancy is intended by the female, but not by the male.

Posted by: Daran at January 5, 2005 4:56 AM

Maybe the Culture of Death would be helped if children were forced to wear a yellow star that indicated they were an "unintended" or "unwanted" baby.

I know several "unintended" people and they are just as productive and part of society as the rest of us. Abortion advocates believe that only the executioner is valid.

BTW, having sex without being willing to get pregnant is just as stupid as speeding without wanting to have a car accident. In both cases, the dead victim is innocent (the baby and the people you killed in the other car), and you are likewise a murderer.

Posted by: Randall Voth at January 5, 2005 6:23 AM

While they certainly bear responsibility for their actions, it still does not make either the pregnancy or the accident the intended consequence.

Posted by: Daran at January 5, 2005 7:32 AM

Daran:

"it may be the pregnancy is intended by the female, but not by the male."

Welcome to life.


Posted by: Peter B at January 5, 2005 8:13 AM

Speeding implies acceptance of the risk.

Posted by: oj at January 5, 2005 9:58 AM
« FREEING THE OTHER HAND: | Main | COSTLIEST?: »