January 15, 2005

SWIMMING WITH THE FISH (via Mike Daley):

Among the Evangelicals: How one reporter got religion (Mark I. Pinsky, January 2005, Columbia Journalism Review)

When I began covering religion for the Los Angeles Times in Orange County in 1985, I knew very little about Sunbelt Christianity. A Jew, born in Miami and raised in the New Jersey suburbs, I first read the New Testament in a college course, and only because it was then required at my historically Methodist university. But over a decade at the Times covering this growing (and, to me, strange) tribe of people called evangelicals I learned a lot — or so I thought. Since this was the era of the televangelism scandals, I focused on religious broadcasting, the outlets based in southern California, like Robert Schuller’s Hour of Power and Paul Crouch’s Trinity Broadcasting Network, that knit together the nation’s evangelical community. Through them, I reasoned, I could better understand their viewers.

At the time, this top-down approach to the beat seemed logical. I was working in Orange County, but I lived in a quaint, cosmopolitan beach community in Los Angeles County, and so I had little visceral sense of what was happening at the evangelical grass roots in my circulation area. In retrospect, it is clear that I should have been paying closer attention to another, equally important story in my backyard: a little congregation called Saddleback Valley Community Church in southern Orange County, which would grow into one of the nation’s most influential mega-churches. Its pastor, the Reverend Rick Warren, whom I confess I never sought out to interview, developed the motivational concept of the forty-day “Purpose Driven Church” that is today sweeping the nation’s congregations and, in book form, is a fixture on the best-seller lists.

Moving to the other end of the Sunbelt in 1995 to cover religion for the Orlando Sentinel, I didn’t have the opportunity to make the same mistake. While evangelicals are part of a varied theological landscape in California, they are the landscape in Florida: Southern Baptists, Pentecostals, charismatic Catholics, and even many mainline Protestants. Suddenly, I found myself in a very different Orange County. The most ubiquitous bumper sticker was not for a commercial rock station; it was for one devoted to contemporary Christian music. In addition to being a tourist Mecca, Orlando was becoming a New Jerusalem for international evangelical organizations, much like Colorado Springs. Reflexively, I returned to my top-down ways, making up for lost time by doing articles about influential para-church organizations like Campus Crusade for Christ and Wycliffe Bible Translators that had by then migrated from southern California to central Florida.

But something was different. For the first time in my life, I was living in a sea of believing, faithful Christians, and the cold shock felt like total immersion. As on the West Coast, I learned a lot on the job, interviewing ministers, leaders, and lay people. I attended church services more often than many Christians — some months more often than I attended my own synagogue. But the most intense part of my education came from outside the job, apart from the mediation of a reporter’s notebook. At PTA meetings, at Scouts, in the supermarket checkout line, and in my neighborhood I encountered evangelicals simply as people, rather than as subjects or sources of quotes for my stories. Our children went to the same birthday parties. We sat next to each other in the bleachers while the kids played recreational sports. Our family doctor went on frequent mission trips and kept a New Testament in each examining room. In the process, I learned about the Great Commission, the biblical obligation of all Christians to share their faith with the once-born and the unsaved.

Evangelicals were no longer caricatures or abstractions. I learned to interpret their metaphors and read their body language. From personal, day-to-day experience I observed what John Green at the University of Akron has discerned from extensive research: evangelicals were not monolithic nor were they, as The Washington Post infamously characterized them, “poor, uneducated and easy to command.” Like Ned Flanders, they are more likely to be overzealous than hypocritical, although there is certainly some of the latter. They don’t march in lockstep to what Pat Robertson or Jerry Falwell or Focus on the Family’s James Dobson tell them, and they hold surprisingly diverse views on many issues. While making common cause politically, their theological differences range from the subtle to the significant. For evangelicals, religion is not just for Sundays — or Election Day.

This epiphany — it would be hard to call it anything else, except maybe a revelation — transformed the way I approached my beat.


One does wonder if major papers make it a practice to send out reporters on other beats who are so completely ignorant of the topic they're going to cover, though reading them suggests the likelihood that the answer is "yes."

Posted by Orrin Judd at January 15, 2005 10:01 PM
Comments

I think it depends on the section. For example, it will become immediately obvious if whoever is assigned to write about, say, cars or sports, doesn't know anything about those subjects.

But how many ex-soldiers get hired to cover military topics by newspapers? Why are retired generals only trotted by TV news networks when a war breaks out, instead of on a regular basis? The only career soldier I can think of who's got his own news show is Oliver North.

The military and religion are viewed with suspicion by 90+ percent of the journalists who staff the nation's newspapers and TV news rooms--and certainly by their editors or producers. Why would they go out of their way to try to staff those departments with people sympathetic to their topics?

Also, how long would an ex-soldier or someone religious last in j-school?

Posted by: Ed Driscoll at January 15, 2005 10:43 PM

oj,
Your closing comment seems to put what I'd thought was an very positive story into a negative light. Not an inaccurate observation, but if we can put those ignorant into a situation where the ignorance is dispelled, is that not a good thing?
A thing to be repeated as often as necessary?
Mike

Posted by: Mike Daley at January 15, 2005 10:58 PM

The writer, Pinsky, is a rare fellow in the best way, he is open-minded and thoughtful towards his opposition, he does not define his position by creating the usual straw-men, and, further, he is hard on himself for not being more thorough early-on. I, too, thought this a very positive story, and a very hopeful one.

I would send this article to my liberal friends is they were still speaking to me...

Posted by: JimGooding at January 15, 2005 11:46 PM

The writer, Pinsky, is a rare fellow in the best way, he is open-minded and thoughtful towards his opposition, he does not define his position by creating the usual straw-men, and, further, he is hard on himself for not being more thorough early-on. I, too, thought this a very positive story, and a very hopeful one.

I would send this article to my liberal friends is they were still speaking to me...

Posted by: JimGooding at January 15, 2005 11:47 PM

Mike:

It's great this guy learned, but that seems rare.

Posted by: oj at January 15, 2005 11:53 PM

Yes, but what kind of dreck did this guy write, and for how many years before he saw the light?

10 years from now will we be praising an epiphany article by someone assigned to cover Iraq in 2003 who now admits he got it all ass-backwards?

Posted by: Jim in Chicago at January 16, 2005 2:09 AM

Considering how many people never admit they were ever wrong, I don't see why not.

Posted by: Ali Choudhury at January 16, 2005 6:48 AM

Coverage of business and economic issues is almost always done by people who couldn't balance the family checkbook. That is why CNBC more often than not resembles one of those Carleton Sheets infomercials.

Posted by: Bart at January 16, 2005 7:48 AM

I have a completely different issue.

Who is the reporter who first used the word "monolithic" to describe a people group?

What is his address?

And, do I have any bullets left for my deer rifle?

And, are there enough bullets to get ALL of the bastards who are now doing it?

What the hell ever happened to "homogenous"?

Posted by: Judd at January 16, 2005 9:24 AM
« IT'S ONLY FUNNY WHEN WE USE IT: | Main | ALL YOU NEED...: »