January 21, 2005

PROJECT GREENLIGHT:

Democrats Support Bush’s Iran Policy (Joshua Frank, January 20, 2005, www.dissidentvoice.org)

[T]he Bush administration may not have to worry about the opposition for round two. While Hersh surmises that Bush’s Iran invasion could be carried out with Israeli special operatives, political opposition may never reach the doorsteps of Congress. After all, the Democrats have long agreed that Iran must be dealt with militarily.

Recently, the Democratic Party’s rising “progressive” star Barack Obama said he would favor “surgical” missile strikes against Iran.

As Obama told the Chicago Tribune on September 26, 2004, “[T]he big question is going to be, if Iran is resistant to these pressures [to stop its nuclear program], including economic sanctions, which I hope will be imposed if they do not cooperate, at what point ... if any, are we going to take military action?”

He added, “[L]aunching some missile strikes into Iran is not the optimal position for us to be in” given the ongoing war in Iraq. “On the other hand, having a radical Muslim theocracy in possession of nuclear weapons is worse.” Obama went on to argue that military strikes on Pakistan should not be ruled out if “violent Islamic extremists” were to “take over.”

Senator John Kerry echoed this sentiment on May 29, 2004, when he told the Washington Post that the Bush Administration has not “been tough on the [Iran] issue … which is the issue of nuclear weaponry, and again just like I said with North Korea, you have to keep your eye on the target.”

Even DNC chair hopeful Howard Dean, allegedly the liberal arm of the Democratic Party, concurs Bush has not been tough enough on Iran. The Forward quotes Dean as saying, “The United States has to ... take a much harder line on Iran and Saudi Arabia because they're funding terrorism.”

In fact, while campaigning for president, Dean contended that President Bush had been far too soft on Iran. In a March appearance on CBS’ Face The Nation, Dean even went so far as to say that “[President Bush] is beholden to the Saudis and the Iranians.”


The need to sound tough while opposing the tough slog in Iraq lured the Democrats into giving the Administration a greenlight on dealing forcefully with Iran and North Korea. It'll be fun watching them denounce themselves as possible action approaches.

Posted by Orrin Judd at January 21, 2005 6:16 PM
Comments

They all said similar things about Saddam and Iraq back when Clinton was president but manage to forget them now. Don't think they'll have trouble doing it again with Iran.

Posted by: noone important at January 21, 2005 6:23 PM

I have to agree. It's hard to be a member of the Democratic Party or the Left these days if remember things more than a year or two back.

Posted by: Annoying Old Guy at January 21, 2005 6:35 PM

Taking out Iran: sounds like real progress to me.

Posted by: Lou Gots at January 21, 2005 7:26 PM

The vision of the leadership of the congressional Democrats supporting the actions of the Ayatollahs of Iran is just too beautiful to behold. They will be in the wilderness for a generation if they oppose military action in Iran.

Posted by: Bart at January 22, 2005 2:46 PM
« "OWNERSHIP" MEANS SOMETHING?: | Main | WAS HAL BUSY? (via Jim Yates): »