January 3, 2005
OSAMA BIN BUSH AND MOHAMMED KERRY
On all sides, the fanatics had a good year (William Pfaff, International Herald Tribune)
2004 was a year of fanaticisms, secular and religious. They drove events in the Mideast, fueling conflict between Jews and Muslims, among Muslims there and elsewhere, and between Muslims and Americans and their allies.Although they are not the most important forces in a large and varied Islamic world, Al Qaeda, the Taliban and Wahhabi fundamentalists are determined to eject American and other Western influences from their societies. Washington claims an equal determination to crush Muslim terrorism and establish secular democracy in what it calls the new Middle East.
The Muslim movements are inspired by a combination of nationalism and religion, and Washington by fear and ideology. Neither will succeed, but the struggle will be costly.
Extremism is internal as well as external. In the American presidential election, the Republicans used "cultural" and moral issues - abortion, homosexuality and feminism - to distract ordinary voters from the economic and social issues directly affecting their lives, where their practical interests usually lie with the Democrats.
But Democrats have driven away many of their natural supporters by their own sectarian and intolerant commitment to feminist and gay issues dear to the party's elite but distressing to masses of working-class and lower-middle-class voters.
Gotta give Mr. Pfaff credit. It takes a rare and unusual talent to outrage us so much that we want to jump to the defense of the Democrats, but he did it.
"The Muslim movements are inspired by a combination of nationalism and religion, and Washington by fear and ideology."
First of all, what nation is Muslim nationalism driven by? Second, isn't America driven by nationalism and religion?
Posted by: oj at January 3, 2005 9:31 AM---Extremism is internal as well as external. In the American presidential election, the Republicans used "cultural" and moral issues - abortion, homosexuality and feminism - to distract ordinary voters from the economic and social issues directly affecting their lives, where their practical interests usually lie with the Democrats.--
Oh, brother, distract? They still can't understand there's more to life than economics.
Anyone else find it odd that they still can't understand why evil greedy rich repugnant republicans voted against their economic interests?
Posted by: Sandy P at January 3, 2005 12:20 PMPfaff lives in Paris and it shows. He is like many ex-pats, he went completely native years ago and hasn't learned anything about the states since he left, which in his case I think is sometime around the Bay of Pigs. Like many ex-pats, he also has this inferiority complex and is firmly of the belief that the lowest croissant baker in the Left Bank knows more about art, culture, politics, economics, history, literature, etc than the leading minds in America. He's just pathetic.
Posted by: Bart at January 3, 2005 3:38 PMShoot, I had to listen to Professor Francis Boyle for 2 hours last week, and he's no further from America than Illinois.
We'd have needed a straitjacket to keep Orrin in his chair for 2 minutes, let alone 2 hours.
Posted by: Harry Eagar at January 4, 2005 12:06 AM