January 5, 2005
NOT DIGNIFIED, JUST EASY:
Dying with Dignity: Beyond the Euthanasia Debate (Eldad Ben-Eliezer, Bruderhof.com)
The word “dignity” can be understood in two senses: the first being “composed, serious, fitting of high rank.” But the other, which is more applicable to the true meaning of human dignity, is “worthy of respect.” In order to understand the real meaning of worthiness, one must look beyond superficial appearances.When Harold, a close friend of mine, was diagnosed with metastatic prostate cancer, we were both devastated. Apart from being a fit, energetic, and lively father of a large family, Harold had a way of reaching people’s hearts like few men I have known. The six months that he had left to live, he spent actively reaching out to family, friends and strangers. When it became clear that his last days were approaching, he was truly at peace.
One might have imagined that Harold’s death would be “dignified” – peacefully slipping away. But no, the last twenty-four hours, which I spent almost continuously with him, were a torture to watch. His body was wracked by convulsions, a side effect of pain medication. Finally the end came with gasping and vomiting blood.
And yet there was a spiritual dignity about Harold that went far above and beyond the physical signs of torment. Here was a man who had fought for life throughout his life and was taking on his last “assignment” with true worthiness. His final suffering brought together his friends and acquaintances, and was a force for good in many lives that had been cool and apathetic beforehand. [...]
I am aware that in many cases the request for euthanasia comes as a result of a lack of good palliative care, or from misguided attempts by the medical profession at prolonging life 'at all costs'. I do feel much needs to be done to address both these needs, to strive in every case to relieve pain and distress, with sensitivity to what is really in the best interest of a dying person. Through such care most requests for euthanasia would not even happen. I do not think that a decision to withhold treatment is the same as actively killing a person. But even with the best and most sensitive care, there will inevitably be some suffering, if not in body then in the mind and spirit. I believe true dignity demands that this be faced and that euthanasia is an affront to true human dignity.
To me, the most important death is that of a man of long-ago Galilee who slowly asphyxiated on an instrument of torture; a man who was spat at, mocked, and abandoned by his friends. There was no “dignity” for him, in the sense of a composed, “peaceful” death. Certainly, it was the farthest thing possible from an “easy death.” But he suffered with true dignity, and was able to say, “Father, forgive them, for they know not what they do.” This dignity in suffering is well described in the chorale from Bach’s St. Matthew’s Passion: “…O noble face, now sorely disfigured and betrayed; before thee all creation is brought to naught, afraid.”
All of us will one day face death, and I believe everyone can face it with true dignity if we are ready to walk to the end the path laid out for us. It may well involve suffering, but through this suffering, the deeper meaning of dignity will shine through.
If it were about human dignity the folks advocating it wouldn't uniformly favor every other aspect of the Culture of Death too. Posted by Orrin Judd at January 5, 2005 10:13 AM
Modern secularists want the power we poor, backward theists believe belongs only to God. The power of life and death, particularly over others, appears to be the goal. One step at a time the process of desensitization has taken place where the inviolabilty of innocenct life is debatable. Where does it end?
Posted by: Tom C., Stamford,Ct. at January 5, 2005 12:19 PMthe bloody streets of Holland
Posted by: oj at January 5, 2005 12:26 PMAs a young man, I took care of a 50-something woman who had been diagnosed with ALS for 7 years. If Dr. Kervorkian had got hold of her a few years before I met her, I would not have had the privilege of knowing this incredibly graceful person. She went through a period of severed depression 2 years into it, when she had to have a mastectomy in addition to being paralyzed. If soomeone would have offered to kill her then, she perhaps would have been persuaded.
Anyway, by the time I got to know her, she was pretty much past the depression. She connected with everyone; fellow "inmates" as well as staff. Though her chronic physical condition was about as bad I have seen it, I never once heard her whine or complain. She knew the names of all my family (and most of the other staff as well). She brought out the sweetness in an impossible old WWII vet who swore at everyone; she recruited him to turn the pages of her Reader's Digest. Not only was a he more and more of a gentleman to her as this continued, he was less combative (if not exactly friendly) to everyone else who had to deal with him.
I have nothing against ameliorating suffering by using whatever narcotics are necessary to kill the pain (even if it ends up killing the patient). Indeed, I think heroin should be legal for this purpose. But that is not what the death lobby is after. Dr. Kervorkian whould have drooled over denying my friend Gladys (and all of us who knew and loved her) her last few years.
Posted by: Ted Welter at January 5, 2005 12:59 PMYou belong to a different Culture of Death, as you revealed with your remarks about the dead from the tsunami.
Hard to avoid, eh?
Posted by: Harry Eagar at January 7, 2005 10:43 PM