January 20, 2005
FOR EVERY ACTION THERE IS AN UNEQUAL AND NEAR IDENTICAL REACTION:
God, no: With so much focus on faith and religion, it's not an easy time to be an atheist (Jack Thomas, January 20, 2005, Boston Globe)
Boston and its academic ambience are a long way from the callous streets of Paterson, N.J., where Zachary Bos grew up with no athletic skills and few friends. He was a gawky, skinny kid who decided the way to survive was to study hard in school, strive as a Boy Scout, and sit up straight during Sunday school at St. Gerard Church.He caroled at Christmas. He spent time with a nun, Sister Susan. He joined youth groups at St. Gerard, and to please his mother, he agreed to be confirmed and to receive Holy Communion.
He was an ideal Roman Catholic boy except for one thing.
He had no faith in God.
He went to confession but thought of it as an artificial exercise.
"If I were truly contrite, I would have just gone out and changed my life," he recalled the other day. "I just didn't see any benefit in talking to someone I didn't know so that, somehow, all of a sudden, everything would be forgiven."
The Boy Scouts wanted him to be trustworthy, loyal, helpful, friendly, courteous, kind, obedient, cheerful, thrifty, brave, and clean.
Fine.
But reverent, too?
Why reverent?
"If you were everything else," he says, "why would you need to be reverent?"
Questions in his head and doubts in his heart gave way to distrust of religion and then to atheism.
Having moved to Boston in 1999 to study physics at Boston University, today Bos, 23, leads one of the city's more arcane organizations, the Atheist Meetup Group, which gathers monthly at a restaurant for food and drink and for conversation not about the New England Patriots, but about moral relativism, objective and subjective probability, and Pascal's Wager on the existence of God. [...]
The Boston atheists meet under the aegis of an organization called Meetup Groups, a worldwide assemblage of cliques that meet to discuss topics of common interest, from knitting to politics to Pekingese dogs. Founded in 2002, the Boston Atheists Meetup Group is one of 405 similar cells around the world that claim 7,500 members. Although 95 are enrolled in the Boston group, the meetings attract no more than 12 people.
"What brings us together is that we take a particular interest in defining ourselves as atheists, which is a negative definition," says Bos, "but there's nothing else that draws us together. We are from very different walks of life -- a college student, a teacher, a security guard. We promote rationality, skepticism, scientific knowledgeability, secular humanism, and a positive atheistic agenda."
For atheists, the monthly meetings are an island of skepticism in a sea of religious conformity.
"They're socially gratifying," says Bos. "It's an exhaust valve just to be associated with like-minded people. I try not to be anti religious, but irritants pile up -- little reminders that we live in a culture that's not rational and, indeed, anti-rational. Walk through Wal-Mart, and they've got entire aisles devoted to religious iconography and pop cultural Jesus novels."
Honest to Darwin, this is not a parody. Posted by Orrin Judd at January 20, 2005 9:46 AM
Hey are you supposed to be taking Darwin's name in vain?
Posted by: Brandon at January 20, 2005 10:54 AMSorry, I'll go say three Hail, Mayrs.
Posted by: oj at January 20, 2005 11:08 AMDo these blue staters simply wander from issue to issue until they find one which enables them to pretend to be oppressed?
P.S. Personally I use Turing and Church instead of Darwin for cursing. They're both "Alan"s which I take as a good sign.
Posted by: Annoying Old Guy at January 20, 2005 11:56 AMBos asks, "If you were everything else, why would you need to be reverent?" Reverence means showing love and respect for something (someone) of value or importance. If your not reverent, than being trustworthy, brave, helpful, etc. is nothing more than an meaningless, empty exercise. Bos has stumbled upon something important here (the importance of reverence in our lives), and sadly brushed it aside.
Posted by: Dave W. at January 20, 2005 1:08 PMPersonally, I always wondered if it was really necessary to have both friendly *and* courteous. Aren't they basically the same thing?
God, atheists are so boring! Honestly, who would you rather hang out with: a bunch of Boston Irish Catholics talking about the Pats or a bunch of dreary Boston athesits talking about subjective probability?
Posted by: Governor Breck at January 20, 2005 7:53 PMOver at Pharyngula.org today, there's a debate among atheists whether they should be -- what's the right word? -- evangelical.
I expect some of you would be amused by it.
Turns out, there's no party line.
Posted by: Harry Eagar at January 20, 2005 11:17 PMHarry: I don't believe it.
Posted by: David Cohen at January 21, 2005 12:06 AMTry taking Darwinian evangelism out of schools and you'll hear the party line quick enough.
Posted by: oj at January 21, 2005 12:17 AMGo read the discussion and report back, David.
Orrin, as a matter of fact, the discussion agreed on one point: that if schools don't want to teach darwinism they don't have to.
The objection is not to removing darwinism but to replacing science with superstition and still claiming it as science.
Posted by: Harry Eagar at January 21, 2005 1:58 PMWhat science?
Posted by: oj at January 21, 2005 2:09 PMThis is just so asinine.
Oppression is where you find it. So the aisles at Wal-Mart are full of religious literature. How does other peoples' ability to make choices of reading material different from yours impinge on your rights? I can't stand romance novels and I think Cosmo is essentially Satanic. Does that mean that my local supermarket is infringing on my civil rights in its book and magazine displays?
Organizations have rules. The Boy Scouts require that people be 'reverent.' If you aren't reverent, don't join the Scouts. Do something else with your time. The US Chess Federation doesn't require reverence, neither do most paintball clubs.
Bos may promote secular humanism and scientific knowledgeability(sic) but he obviously is completely unfamiliar with the concept of tolerance for people whose views are different from his own. I grimly suspect that his little 'Atheist Meetup Group' has less free discussion than the average Al-Qaeda singalong around the campfire. Everyone sits around saying the same damn thing and everyone else just nods in agreement certain of their own brilliance and the ignorance of all non-believers. Why doesn't this goober and his coterie just get matching blue jump suits and Nikes and wait for the next comet to bring Armageddon?
Posted by: Bart at January 21, 2005 6:28 PM