January 10, 2005
EVERY SECT THINKS IT'S SPECIAL:
Intellectual Treason (Meera Nanda, Jan 07, 05, New Humanist)
The second-term election victory of George Bush - and India's own experience with Hindu nationalist BJP rule, off and on, through the last decade - captures a dangerous moment in world history. We are witnessing the world's first and the world's largest liberal constitutional democracies, officially committed to secularism, slide toward religious nationalism. By voting out the BJP and its allies in the last election, the Indian voters have halted this slide, at least for now - a heartening development, compared to the virtual take-over of America by Christian evangelicals and fundamentalists.The question that interests me in this electoral route to faith–based governance is how this counter–revolution is actually accomplished, or to put it differently, how the spirit of secularism gets subverted, without any formal abrogation of secular laws. Unless we understand the ideological mechanism of this sacralisation of politics, we will not be able to combat the ongoing coups against secularism under nominally secular democracies.
As a student of the history and philosophy of science, I have been watching with concern how modern science itself — perhaps the single most powerful force for secularisation — is being re–coded as sacred, either as affirming the Bible or the Vedas, or as ‘lower knowledge’ of ‘dead matter’, in need of spiritualisation. As an old–time partisan of the Enlightenment and scientific temper, I have been watching with concern as my fellow intellectuals and activists, in the United States and India, who identify themselves with social justice, anti–imperialism, women’s rights and sustainable development, have themselves paved the way for re–enchantment or re–sacralisation of science.
Rather, the traditionally religious have just gotten wise to the game and recognized that sciencism, secularism, Darwinism, Relativism, etc. are religions too. they have a place in the discussion but not pride of place. Posted by Orrin Judd at January 10, 2005 1:24 PM
Very well said. Maybe it really is better that you sit here thinking all day rather than waste your time working or skiing.
Posted by: Peter B at January 10, 2005 1:45 PMBaseball, too, by that standard
Posted by: Harry Eagar at January 10, 2005 2:59 PMReligious sectarianism has been a boon to the region.
Not.
Posted by: Jeff Guinn at January 10, 2005 5:05 PMJeff:
The region being the U.S. and the sects being the rationalists, I'm forced to agree with for once.
Posted by: oj at January 10, 2005 5:24 PMJeff:
"Religious sectarianism..."
Don't you just drool when you see those two words together? Don't they just vindicate all you believe and don't they just drive you to to get up early in the morning to take on those mendacious theocrats?
SOUNDS LIKE A JOB FOR CAPTAIN SECULARIST!
Posted by: Peter B at January 10, 2005 7:14 PMHey! I'm an evangelical Christian, and I hear we've taken over. Very cool--when do the bennies start flowing my way?
Posted by: at January 11, 2005 3:22 AMTHe BJP lost because they were unable to convince the average Indian voter that their policies were of any benefit to him. It was seen as a caste-based party focusing on giving goodies to rich educated people. The notion that there was some nationwide rejection of Hindu nationalism is just absurd.
Congress also made a point of re-Hinduizing while out of power, pushing the Italian Sonia Gandhi to the sidelines. Their policy towards Muslims and towards Pakistan is no different from the BJP's.
Posted by: Bart at January 11, 2005 7:13 AM