January 20, 2005

ANTI-HUMANISM:

An American in Paris: While officially every European government is welcoming the inauguration of President Bush, the prevailing mood on the Continent seems to be one of shock and awe. (THOMAS L. FRIEDMAN, 1/20/05, NY Times)

Why are Europeans so blue over George Bush's re-election? Because Europe is the world's biggest "blue state." This whole region is a rhapsody in blue. These days, even the small group of anti-anti-Americans in the European Union is uncomfortable being associated with Mr. Bush. There are Euro-conservatives, but, aside from, maybe, the ruling party in Italy, there is nothing here that quite corresponds to the anti-abortion, anti-gay, anti-tax, anti-national-health-care, anti-Kyoto, openly religious, pro-Iraq-war Bush Republican Party.

If you took all three major parties in Britain - Labor, Liberals and Conservatives - "their views on God, guns, gays, the death penalty, national health care and the environment would all fit somewhere inside the Democratic Party," said James Rubin, the Clinton State Department spokesman, who works in London. "That's why I get along with all three parties here. They're all Democrats!"

While officially every European government is welcoming the inauguration of President Bush, the prevailing mood on the continent (if I may engage in a ridiculously sweeping generalization!) still seems to be one of shock and awe that Americans actually re-elected this man.

Before Mr. Bush's re-election, the prevailing attitude in Europe was definitely: "We're not anti-American. We're anti-Bush." But now that the American people have voted to re-elect Mr. Bush, Europe has a problem maintaining this distinction. The logic of the Europeans' position is that they should now be anti-American, not just anti-Bush, but most Europeans don't seem to want to go there. They know America is more complex. So there is a vague hope in the air that when Mr. Bush visits Europe next month, he'll come bearing an olive branch that will enable both sides to at least pretend to hold this loveless marriage together for the sake of the kids.

"Europeans were convinced that Kerry had won on election night and were telling themselves that they knew all along that Americans were not all that bad - and then suddenly, as the truth emerged, there was a feeling of slow resignation: 'Oh well, we've been dreaming,' " said Dominique Moisi, one of France's top foreign policy analysts. "In fact, real America is moving away from us. We don't share the same values. ... In France it was a very emotional issue. It was as if Americans were voting for the president of France as much as for president of the United States."

That sense that America is now so powerful that it influences everyone else's politics more than their own governments - so everyone wants to vote in our elections - is something you hear more and more these days.


All you have to do to see why we are diverging so rapidly is to reverse Mr. Friedman's formulation and derive near universal European opinion: pro-abortion, pro-gay, pro-tax, pro-national-health-care, pro-Kyoto, anti-religious, anti-war. In a word: anti-human.

Posted by Orrin Judd at January 20, 2005 9:27 AM
Comments

If you took all three major parties in Britain - Labor, Liberals and Conservatives - "their views on God, guns, gays, the death penalty, national health care and the environment would all fit somewhere inside the Democratic Party

And if you take the entire range of British politics from the heyday of the Empire and brought it forward, they would all be Republicans. In other words, the Republican party is the party of growth, optimism and strength, while the Democrats are the party of pessimism, defeat and decline.

Posted by: David Cohen at January 20, 2005 9:38 AM

This is a recent post at David's Medienkritik:

Your Article about the "Sueddeutsche Zeitung" was most interesting.

I am married to a beautiful German lady I met while serving in the Army in Germany in 1960.

She still has family living in Germany, a brother and sister.

Her sister is presently visiting us here in Texas. When the topic turns to politics she states that she is very conservative and votes for the CDU. However when the topic turns to our President, George W. Bush, she cannot understand how we can support him. She recites all of the stories she reads in the German Media to substantuate how really bad he is as a President.

My wfe and I will retort with facts and figures and give her alternate reading material

After several days she came to me and stated that she could not believe how one sided the German media was and what a one sided picture they were getting.

This is a woman who has a colledge education and comes from an outstanding family who consideres themselves conservative. Can you imagine what a liberal person in Germany thinks after such contact with such a leberal media?


---

One at a time, it's slow....

Posted by: Sandy P at January 20, 2005 9:55 AM

I am going to Europe for two weeks next month, should be fun!

Posted by: BJW at January 20, 2005 9:59 AM

Did Friedman fall on the ice and bump his head? He has been making more sense lately.

Posted by: Robert Schwartz at January 20, 2005 3:16 PM

I've no dog in this fight, but my physics adviser and his wife just returned from 6 weeks in Europe, mostly Paris.

He's fluent in French and tells me that while everybody he encountered hates Bushitler, there was, in his words, 'absolutely no' antagonism to Americans in bulk.

Posted by: Harry Eagar at January 20, 2005 11:21 PM

Of course, the Euros want to vote in our elections. Much of European politics for the last 5 decades has been about milking the American taxpayer, forcing us to subsidize their welfare states by paying for their defense. What better world for Euros than to vote in our elections and not pay taxes to DC?

Posted by: Bart at January 21, 2005 6:48 PM
« ORIGINALIST ON THE GRASSY KNOLL: | Main | WHO HARRY SHOULD HAVE DRESSED AS (David Hill, The Bronx:) »