December 1, 2004
ONE DOUBTS THE OTHERS WERE FLASHING THE "W":
President and Prime Minister Martin Discuss Common Goals (Lester B. Pearson Building, Ottawa, Canada, 11/30/04)
Q: My question is for President Bush. And then, Prime Minister, if you would respond en Francais, s'il vous plait?Posted by Orrin Judd at December 1, 2004 12:00 AMIn the days after September 11th, thousands of Canadians went to Parliament Hill to demonstrate solidarity with the U.S. -- and, in fact, in cities across the country. Yet, public opinion polls and other evidence suggest that now, today, our peoples are, in fact, diverging; that, in fact, our peoples are drifting apart. Why do you think that is? And do you have any responsibility for it?
PRESIDENT BUSH: You know, I haven't seen the polls you look at, and we just had a poll in our country where people decided that the foreign policy of the Bush administration ought to be -- stay in place for four more years. And it's a foreign policy that works with our neighbors. Trade between our countries has never been stronger. But it's a foreign policy that also understands that we've got an obligation to defend our security. I made some decisions obviously, that some in Canada didn't agree with, like, for example, when we removed Saddam Hussein and enforcing the demands of the United Nations Security Council.
But the agenda that the Prime Minister and I talked about is one that -- where most people should agree: that we'll work to fight disease and poverty on the continent of Africa, for example; that we'll work to make sure our hemisphere is -- trades as freely as possible; that we'll work to make sure that the Afghan people continue to enjoy the fruits of a democratic and free society; and that's important for Iraq to become a democratic society. And I think it will be.
No, look, I fully understand there are some in my country -- probably in your country and around the world -- that do not believe that Iraq has the capacity of self-government, that they're willing to sign those people up for tyranny. That's not what I think. And that's not what a lot of Americans think. And they believe that democracy is possible in Iraq. That's a legitimate point to debate. But I'm the kind of fellow who does what I think is right, and will continue to do what I think is right. I'll consult with our friends and neighbors, but if I think it's right to remove Saddam Hussein for the security of the United States, that's the course of action I'll take. And some people don't like that; I understand that. But that's a good thing about a democracy, people can express themselves freely.
I, frankly, felt like the reception we received on the way in from the airport was very warm and hospitable, and I want to thank the Canadian people who came out to wave -- with all five fingers -- for -- (laughter) -- for their hospitality. (Laughter.)
What President bush really wanted to say:
"Look, 80% of Canda's imports come from the US, at least that much of your national security is dependent on the US military, and the bulk of your population lives within an hour's drive of our common border. I'm not responsible for the drift you speak of, you are because you sit on the fence between North America and Europe. If Upper and Lower Canada had rebelled in 1776 with the rest of British North America, then all would of been well; yea, we would have eventually had to let Quebec go its own way, never were like us, english that is. no, the drift is because many up here in the great white north are afraid to catch the North American dream; and no I won't par'le vous Francais.
Posted by: Phil at December 1, 2004 2:27 AMI read an interesting little factoid the other day. Twice as many Canadians applied to live in the US as Americans applied to live in Canada. Given that Canada has about 10% of the population of the US, that says something, doesn't it?
Posted by: Bart at December 1, 2004 3:38 AMI saw that exchange in full on C-SPAN yesterday. It was like the question asked of Bush in one of the debates: what has been your biggest mistake in office?
The Dims wanted to use that answer as a sound bite in one of their campaign spots. Bush (a) didn't answer the Francaise question, and (b) made everybody bust out laughing with the end of his chosen answer.
Talk about shredding one multilinqual media wannabee! He should do more of that with domestic questioners.
Posted by: John J. Coupal at December 1, 2004 5:10 AMThe request for froggy-speak was for the PM only.
If Quebec had any smarts, they'd switch to Spanish.
Posted by: Raoul Ortega at December 1, 2004 11:31 AM