December 10, 2004
MANAGING THE DISAPPEARANCE:
The changing of the guard: As Nicolas Sarkozy takes over Jacques Chirac's party, it signals the beginning of a battle of ideas over the future of France (The Economist, Dec 2nd 2004)
Although they spring from the same political family, Mr Chirac and Mr Sarkozy embody two quite different and competing ideas about the future of France. Mr Chirac is a neo-Gaullist conservative who believes that French power should be projected through a strong Europe, built on the Franco-German axis and forming a counterbalance to the United States. At home, he defends the costly but comfortable French social model. And he believes that France's Muslim population—Europe's biggest, at around 5m strong—is best served by traditional means of integration: strict separation of religion and state, and equal treatment of individuals before the law. “There is no crisis,” says one of his advisers. “Therefore, there is no need for fundamental reform.”Mr Sarkozy, by contrast, has no time for tradition for tradition's sake. In an enlarged Europe, he argues that France can no longer rely on the Franco-German motor and needs to cultivate a group of six that also includes Britain, Spain, Italy and Poland. Atlantic-minded, he urges a milder approach to America. He advocates an overhaul of the French social model, pushing for less state regulation and a more flexible labour market; his inspirations are Britain and Spain, not moribund Germany. He considers that the French model of integration has failed French Muslims, and argues for American-style social engineering to help minorities advance. In short, where Mr Chirac urges caution and conservatism, Mr Sarkozy presses for modernisation and change. “France is not eternal,” says one of his aides. “If it does not reform, it will disappear.”
Hard to see what reform will do in the longer term. Posted by Orrin Judd at December 10, 2004 12:07 PM
What do you suppose he means by "American-style social engineering to help minorities advance" - Affirmative Action?
Posted by: Brandon at December 10, 2004 12:21 PMBack in the 1950s and 60s, France fought and lost a dirty war to keep Algeria part of"Metropolitan France." It would appear that in a few decades, there will be a reunification, but it will be France becoming a part of "Metropolitan Algeria."
Posted by: Raoul Ortega at December 10, 2004 1:28 PMBrandon, yes.
If Sarkozy pushes for reform, he runs up against the entire French polity, from the enarques who believe they are born to the purple, to the masses which have always quested for a Caesar-man, whether Robespierre, Napoleon or DeGaulle. The original 'man on horseback' was Colonel Boulanger.
Posted by: Bart at December 10, 2004 5:47 PMOrrin. There are no one way trips. History rocks back and forth and sometimes goes off a cliff. France may be taking a standing 8 count but the match has many rounds to go.
Posted by: Robert Schwartz at December 10, 2004 10:38 PMVery true Robert, France has a history dating back to the 8th Century. Frankreich (German) will rise again.
the original "man on horseback" was King Chrales Martel (688-741).
Posted by: Dave W. at December 13, 2004 9:43 PMVery true Robert, France has a history dating back to the 8th Century. Frankreich (German) will rise again.
The original "man on horseback" was King Charles Martel (688-741).
Posted by: Dave W. at December 13, 2004 9:43 PMDave,
If you do a google search for 'Man on Horseback,' it will lead you to General Georges Boulanger who was picked by a group of royalists to lead a coup against the Third Republic in the late 19th century.
Posted by: Bart at December 14, 2004 7:05 AMBart:
I did look him up after your last post. I was just attempting to show that france has a very long history of rising, falling, and rising again. Also, I find 8th & 9th Century European history fascinating!
