December 5, 2004
LEST WE FORGET
Party Boss' Slaying Set Off Purges (Vladimir Kovalev, St. Petersburg Times, December 3rd, 2004)
Seventy years ago on Wednesday, on Dec. 1, 1934, a shot rang out that killed not only the Communist Party boss of Leningrad, but also marked the start of a wave of mass repressions by Soviet dictator Josef Stalin.Sergei Kirov, a Politburo member, was shot dead in a corridor in the former Smolny Institute girls' school about 4:30pm by Leonid Nikolayev, a former communist who not long before the assassination had been expelled from the party for "inappropriate behavior."
But it is now widely believed by historians that Stalin organized Kirov's slaying to get rid of a popular potential rival and as a pretext for a mass purge of the citizens of Leningrad, as St. Petersburg was then known, and the rest of the Soviet population.
Stalin hated the cultured city and the purges led by Kirov's successor, Andrei Zhdanov, centered on it. Tens of thousands of citizens were arrested and it has been estimated a quarter of the city was arrested, deported or killed over the next two years.
"The assassin detained at the scene of the crime appeared to be a member of the former opposition anti-revolutionary group that was organized by members of anti-Soviet [Grigory] Zinovyev's group in Leningrad," a Communist Party account of the incident written in 1945 says.
"The assassination of S. M. Kirov, the working class favorite, has provoked wide-scale anger and deep regret among the workers of our country."
Nikolayev and 13 others were charged with plotting the assassination. All were convicted, sentenced to death and shot shortly after the assassination.
All the alleged killers, except Nikolayev, were rehabilitated in 1956 as Nikita Khrushchev tried to correct the record of those falsely incriminated during Stalin's rule.
But the first 14 victims were just the beginning of what is today called the Great Terror that cost millions of Soviet citizens their lives in the years before World War II.
Historians estimate that from Jan. 1, 1935 until July 1, 1941 (Hitler attacked the Soviet Union on June 22, 1941) more than 19.8 million people were arrested, including 7 million who were summarily convicted, often by troikas of three NKD secret police officers, and shot.
Although these facts (and the author’s estimates are very conservative) are now well-known, apologists on the left continue to offer perfunctory expressions of regret and to divert moral outrage to the cases of anti-marxist dictators whose records of oppression are picayune in comparison. This week, we saw a good example here as a commentator thundered accusations of “apostle of murder” at anyone who defended Pinochet of Chile. Pinochet, who is accused of being responsible for 8,000 deaths, is the man responsible for saving his country from going down the road taken by Russia, China, Vietnam, North Korea, Cambodia and Cuba. Had it done so, the chance that Chileans would have suffered a similarly horrific fate is as close to a historical certainty as one can get. We assume all those enraged leftists determined to see him dishonoured and imprisoned regret that they didn’t.
Posted by Peter Burnet at December 5, 2004 12:50 PMIt's also somewhat amusing that what little animosity the Left has for Stalin is generally reserved for the Great Terror's purge of their fellow ideologues or the exile and subsequent assassination of Trotsky.
Posted by: MB at December 5, 2004 4:40 PMOJ:
What enrages me to no end is watching the whole world gang up on small fries like Pinochet while most of the old Eastern European party bosses go unpunished and the world toasts Yasser Arafat. Vladimir Bukovsky has repeatedly called for trials of the old commies; paraphrasing P.J. O'Rourke, we'll see that happen sometime during the second Trump administration.
The very thought that these kind of people run the world's outrage sweepstakes is enough to make my head burst.
Posted by: Matt Murphy at December 5, 2004 10:04 PMThe Communists that Pinochet executed, more than anyone else, should appreciate that the end justified the means.
Posted by: vidkunquisling at December 6, 2004 12:32 AM...the chance that Chileans would have suffered a similarly horrific fate is as close to a historical certainty as one can get.
So Marx was right - there *are* historical laws at work. How ugly and ironic that it redounds to his discredit.
Posted by: Bruce Cleaver at December 6, 2004 6:12 AMFranco. Don't forget Franco, or General Loan. Is there any force we would not use to spare our country from the Red Terror?
Remember that America faced the monster over the nuclear gunsight for almost 50 years. We were ready for total war, having made the decision to prefer death to Communism. Rather more dramatic than whacking a single Commie in the side of the head with a snubbie, no?
Posted by: Lou Gots at December 6, 2004 10:36 AMSorry if I withhold my enthusiasm for defenders of White Terror.
Posted by: Harry Eagar at December 6, 2004 1:07 PMHarry:
You can't be enthiusiatic for both the Red and the White can you?
Posted by: oj at December 6, 2004 1:13 PMAs one of the many leftists who define their politics around their anti-Stalinism, I salute Orrin for this memorial.
Posted by: Rick Perlstein at December 6, 2004 7:40 PM