December 9, 2004

AND THEN, MY DEAR, THESE DUSKY IMMIGRANTS APPEARED AT OUR GLOBAL WARMING FUNDRAISER

Squatting Rights ( New York Times, December 8th, 2004)

There is no historic preservation district or landmarks commission for hawks' nests. But if there were, the red-tailed hawk's nest at 927 Fifth Avenue, overlooking Central Park at 74th Street, would surely have qualified.

Until Tuesday, the nest stood on a 12th-floor cornice with a sublime aerial view of the urban forest in our midst. Since 1993, 23 young hawks have been raised there, sired by a bird called Pale Male. Thousands and thousands of bird-watchers over the years have followed the lives of the hawks in that nest. But this is not an homage to bird-watching - it's an homage to birds.

On Tuesday, workers took down the nest and, apparently, the metal anti-pigeon spikes that had helped hold it in place. So far, no one from 927 Fifth Avenue has spoken up to defend the co-op board's decision to remove the nest. Perhaps residents were annoyed that the hawks didn't do a better job of cleaning up after themselves by using a pooper-scooper or putting their pigeon bones in the trash, the way a human would. Perhaps they simply wearied of the stirring sight of a red-tailed hawk coming down out of the sky to settle on its nest.

It's always tempting to think that a city like New York has utterly effaced the natural ground on which it was built. Most of the creatures that lived on Manhattan Island several centuries ago would stand no chance of doing so now - not in these new canyons of steel and glass. But the presence of a nesting pair of red-tailed hawks, sequestered on the edge of an apartment building, feels like a memory from a past this city has long since forgotten.

The hawks have gone out of their way to learn to live with us. The least the wealthy residents of 927 Fifth Avenue could have done was learn to live with the hawks.

Aren’t environmentalism and human rights things they fight for but the little people do?

Posted by Peter Burnet at December 9, 2004 7:50 PM
Comments

They could have just shipped the hawks to St Anne's Basilica to help Father Lavoie with the pigeon problem.

Posted by: John at December 9, 2004 10:10 PM

If red-tailed hawks can't deal with new realities, who needs them? Do they taste good in a cream sauce, if you deep-fry them, if you saute' them with a little white wine? If not, who cares?

Posted by: Bart at December 9, 2004 10:16 PM

They're not that bad, like bald eagle, but without that fishy taste.

Posted by: AllenS at December 10, 2004 2:44 AM

I live in So. New Jersey...1/8 of a mile away from the intersection of State Route 30 and Interstate 295--densely populated suburbia/very loud/lots of truck and auto traffic...We've been entertained by the antics of a healthy male adult Red Tailed Hawk for a few years now...Looked up the Red Tail in the Audubon guide...While not as ubiquitous as pigeons, they are rather plentiful, occupying a wide swath of the Northeast...I had no idea...Neither, apparently, do Manhattanites. Get over it. We're fairly certain that the hawk will. These people gotta get out more. (Do they think the hawk won't re-build somewhere, starting within minutes after his nest has been destroyed? Do they think that, in nature, a hawk's nest, once built, remains unmolested? And that a hawk has never had to rebuild a nest?)

Posted by: Brian McKim at December 10, 2004 11:42 AM

I worked at the (now defunct) Control Data headquarters building in the late 80s, and there was a falcon who nested on top of the building right above the entrance. I got used to seeing bird parts littering the sidewalk.

The building manager could have easily built a canvas awning over the sidewalk in front of the building that would have shielded the pedestrians.

Posted by: Robert Duquette at December 10, 2004 10:52 PM
« IF YOU THOUGHT THE ZIONIST AND NEO-CON PLOTS WERE SCARY... | Main | BEWITCHED, BOTHERED & BEWILDERED: »