November 29, 2004
WIDE ANGLE VIEW:
Discerning the Trends: The Prophecy of C. S. Lewis (BreakPoint with Chuck Colson, November 29, 2004)
C. S. Lewis was born on this date in 1898, and forty-one years after his death, one thing has become startlingly clear: This Oxford don was not only a keen apologist but also a true prophet for our postmodern age.For example, Lewis’s 1947 book, Miracles, was penned before most Christians were aware of the emerging philosophy of naturalism. This is the belief that there is a naturalistic explanation for everything in the universe.
Naturalism undercuts any objective morality, opening the door to tyranny. In his book The Abolition of Man, Lewis warned that naturalism turns humans into objects to be controlled. It turns values into “mere natural phenomena”—which can be selected and inculcated into a passive population by powerful Conditioners. Lewis predicted a time when those who want to remold human nature “will be armed with the powers of an omnicompetent state and an irresistible scientific technique.” Sounds like the biotech debate today, doesn’t it?
Why was Lewis so uncannily prophetic? At first glance he seems an unlikely candidate. He was not a theologian; he was an English professor. What was it that made him such a keen observer of cultural and intellectual trends?
The answer may be somewhat discomfiting to modern evangelicals: One reason is precisely that Lewis was not an evangelical. He was a professor in the academy, with a specialty in medieval literature, which gave him a mental framework shaped by the whole scope of intellectual history and Christian thought. As a result, he was liberated from the narrow confines of the religious views of the day—which meant he was able to analyze and critique them.
There's no reason for the faithful to retreat from the world. What separates their worldview from other metaphors is that it uniquely is true from without, not just from within. Posted by Orrin Judd at November 29, 2004 4:35 PM
Actually, Lewis began his studies in philosophy, which helped him immeasurably after his conversion. He knew the enemy well. He knew himself well.
Posted by: jim hamlen at November 29, 2004 8:59 PMThe converts who come from the Other Side often become the strongest advocates. In religion (Paul) or politics (Hitchens).
Posted by: Gideon at November 29, 2004 9:26 PMHe wasn't much of a prophet, the Soviet Union was formed in 1917. His diagnosos that "naturalism did it" is just a point of view, there is nothing proven about it. Super-naturalism has plenty of blood on its hands. Evil people of every stripe try to form tyrannies over their fellow men, and fellow men of every stripe are duped into following them, to their own doom.
Posted by: Robert Duquette at November 30, 2004 2:00 PMRobert:
It's proven to the satisfaction of all but Naturalists, who remain trapped in the metaphor.
Posted by: oj at November 30, 2004 2:53 PMAs the faults of Supernaturalism are proven to all but the Supernaturalists, who remain trapped in the metaphor.
Posted by: Robert Duquette at November 30, 2004 4:36 PMAh, but the Naturalists are inside the SuperNatural metaphor too, while the SuperNaturalists are outside the Naturalist's, looking in, bemused...
Posted by: oj at November 30, 2004 4:44 PMNo they aren't. Naturalism accounts for supernatural belief systems - they are an evolutionary adaptation.
Posted by: Robert Duquette at November 30, 2004 9:59 PMAh, falling for Satan's tricks again?
Posted by: oj at November 30, 2004 11:30 PM