November 23, 2004
THE COWBOY'S NOT FOR TURNING:
Bush the Insurgent: A president who won't kowtow to DC's establishment. (FRED BARNES, November 23, 2004, Wall Street Journal)
Mr. Bush finds himself in the unusual position--for a president, anyway--as leader of the insurgents. Unlike other presidents who came to Washington with bold plans, Mr. Bush has not been housebroken by establishment forces. Even Ronald Reagan made peace with Washington. Mr. Bush hasn't. He wants to impose a breathtakingly conservative agenda in his second term, one that has prompted cries of protest from establishment figures like David Gergen, aide to four presidents, and the voice of the Beltway, the Washington Post.Contrary to the doubters, the establishment does exist and does throw its weight around. It consists of the permanent bureaucracy, much of the vast political community of lobbyists and lawyers and consultants, leftovers from Congress and earlier administrations, trade groups and think tanks, and the media. The establishment can and does shape the zeitgeist in Washington and, importantly, a huge chunk of the Senate is establishment-oriented and dozens of senators themselves members of the establishment. It's become more Republican in recent years but is still center-left in ideological tilt. But it's liberal in a reactionary way, passionately opposing conservative change.
In the eyes of the establishment, the Bush tactics, the Bush agenda, and Mr. Bush himself are over the top. The president is girding for battle. He's aiming to consolidate control of his administration, drive out recalcitrant (read: establishment) elements, and make the permanent government heel, especially at the CIA and State Department. He's kept his White House staff intact, from political adviser Karl Rove to speechwriter Mike Gerson to budget chief Josh Bolten, as a kind of headquarters cadre. The White House aides who've departed, such as national security adviser Condoleezza Rice and counsel Alberto Gonzales, were dispatched to take over Cabinet agencies.
Mr. Bush's agenda is post-Reagan in its conservatism, which means it's more far-reaching and thus more threatening to the establishment. Mr. Bush would not only reform Social Security and allow individuals to invest a portion of their payroll taxes in financial markets, he would also revamp the entire federal tax code and fill the Supreme Court with judicial conservatives. And those are only his domestic plans. In foreign affairs, Mr. Bush would make aggressive efforts to spread democracy around the world the centerpiece. The foreign policy élite is aghast.
...and agog. Posted by Orrin Judd at November 23, 2004 10:11 AM
He's biting off too much. I have a hunch that taking on the CIA, STATE, the establishment, the blue state politicians, and the media is going to lead to his death. I'll be amazed if he's still alive at the end of 2005. Bummer.
Posted by: Bret at November 23, 2004 12:04 PMDo you expect Bill Moyers to lead a coup?
Posted by: George at November 23, 2004 12:32 PMI'm saying that the more enemies you make, especially ones who think they have nothing left to lose, the more likely it that there is a group of them who are adequately looney, yet adequately competent to kill the President. Not only that, many of W's enemies live in DC, and that enhances their chances of success.
I sure hope I'm wrong, but I'm worried.
Posted by: Bret at November 23, 2004 12:43 PMAlso, remember that thinly veiled call for his assassination in that NY Times article excerpted on this blog?
Posted by: Bret at November 23, 2004 12:49 PMWhile passion can overwhelm logic, all they get out of an assassination of Bush is President Cheney. Given that the script on the left for the past four years is that Cheney is the evil brains behind the Bush White House (at least the part of the brain Karl Rove doesn't control), its hard to see what political change any domestic enemy would get out of a successful assassination, other than the commissioning of the George W. Bush quarter by the U.S. Mint.
Posted by: John at November 23, 2004 12:54 PMFortunately, without logic, it's much harder to outsmart the Secret Service.
Posted by: Timothy at November 24, 2004 12:28 AM