November 21, 2004

IF I SHOULD DIE BEFORE I WAKE...:

Dodging market forces gives Germany rude awakening (Charles Stein, November 21, 2004, Boston Globe)

Global competition can be a drag. It all but guarantees a steady stream of restructuring, outsourcing, and the nagging insecurity that comes from knowing someone out there may be trying to take your job.

In the United States, we have embraced market forces and the results have been pretty good: The American economy has performed well, even though many individuals have suffered.

But what if we'd chosen a different path? What if, instead of embracing competition, we had done our best to ignore it or insulate ourselves from the painful adjustments the marketplace demands? What would our economy look like then?

It might look a lot like Germany's. And that would not be so great.

The German economy grew at a 0.4 percent annual pace in the third quarter. Retail sales barely grew at all. Germany's recent dismal performance can be blamed, in part, on the rising price of oil and the rising value of the euro, which makes German goods more expensive to overseas buyers.

But the German economy has been dismal for a long time. Over the past decade Germany grew at roughly a 1.3 percent annual pace, compared to 3.3 percent for the United States. "And we worry that we are growing too slowly," said Nariman Behravesh, chief economist at Global Insight in Waltham.

Germany has a long list of economic problems. Yet its central problem has been an unwillingness to recognize that it lives in an increasingly competitive world. Wages and benefits in Germany rose steadily over the decade, even as productivity grew modestly. German companies reacted by voting with their feet for cheaper production facilities in Eastern Europe. Job growth has been anemic.

Germany has been slow to shift from manufacturing to services, slow to develop "new economy" industries, slow to innovate in financial services -- mortgage refinancing is rare -- and slow to allow competitive forces to reshape retailing.

"They don't have the freewheeling, innovative situation you see in Silicon Valley," said Martin Baily, an economist and the co-author of a new book, "Transforming the European Economy."


Why should the rapidly aging populations of the secular West willing to accept less security? The old aren't risk-takers.

Posted by Orrin Judd at November 21, 2004 4:47 PM
Comments

Anybody who has ever held a job in the manufacturing industry knows that the Democrats' love of Science ends in the lab (of academia). As soon as someone turns Science into a technological reality, their Luddite paymasters the trial lawyers and the union bosses take over.

What's the point of American firms researching stem cell (embryonic or otherwise) technologies to death (literally?), if derivative products end up being "regulated" like flu vaccines?

I guess politics plays a role at both ends of the discovery-delivery process.

Posted by: Moe from NC at November 21, 2004 6:03 PM

The old aren't risk takers, but age is also supposed to bring wisdom.

Sometimes sticking with a familiar but failed system is the greater risk.

As with American SS reform, it's possible to ensure that the already aged receive exactly what they had expected, while letting the less-old and young adapt to changing circumstances.

Posted by: Michael Herdegen at November 21, 2004 8:28 PM

It's not a risk if you think you'll be dead before it all goes bung.

Posted by: oj at November 21, 2004 8:36 PM

This does have the makings of a massive intergenerational conflict. Another aspect of the German situation -- many years of low growth, highly risk-averse population, is zero-sum thinking. "Betting" some job market dislocation on "maybe" a growing economy doesn't sound like a good tradeoff for people who think visible losses only become someone else's gain.

Posted by: Dave Sheridan at November 22, 2004 5:21 AM

oj,

Older people in post-industrial societies, especially as you move up the education and income scale, do not fit your apparent view of decrepit senescence. There are plenty of octogenarian day-traders and real estate sharks, scholars and mathematicians, lawyers and physicians.

Posted by: Bart at November 22, 2004 6:59 AM

Bart:

plenty?

Posted by: oj at November 22, 2004 7:08 AM

If the numbers I've met are any indication that's the case. Go to any prominent country club on Family Day and you'll see bushels of them. My uncle and his entire social circle fit that picture.

Posted by: Bart at November 22, 2004 7:33 AM
« THE LEFT'S GOT TO BE MORE CAREFUL ABOUT PICKING HEROES: | Main | SCOPES WAS CONVICTED: »