November 9, 2004
I FART IN YOUR GENERAL DIRECTION
A Lingering Sense of Loss (Gersh Kunztman, Newsweek, November 8th, 2004)
And I wasn't alone here in New York City, where nearly 80 percent of the voters supported Kerry. Mostly, we were disgusted to discover that our fellow Americans were not our fellow Americans at all, but a bunch of strangers who cite "moral values" as the biggest issue. That made me angry.My first reaction to it was: "F*$@ you and your f*%!#@&% moral values!"
My second reaction was: Since when are liberal values immoral? If you take the central issues that liberals fight for—a clean environment, fair wages for working people, expanded civil rights, the rights of homosexual adults to copulate freely—these are ultimately American values. Yes, we liberals sometimes think we know better than you do—but, unlike the president, we don't make it the central pillar of our campaign.
My third reaction was: What good are "moral values" anyway? The five states with the highest divorce rates in the country are Nevada, Arkansas, Idaho, Florida and Alabama—all of them red! And the two lowest? The bluest of the blue: the District of Columbia and Massachusetts (with heathen New York and Connecticut closely behind)!
My fourth reaction was: If abortion is such a big issue to these moral value folks, why don't they support gay marriages—the only abortion-free relationships?
My fifth and final reaction was: How can these Red States people cite moral values, yet ignore the immorality of a war that has caused the death of tens, if not hundreds, of thousands of people? If anyone should be beating the war drum, it should be we here in immoral New York, which has been—and will always be—the terrorists' favorite target. We don't go a day without reliving the horror of September 11—not the abstract, "Wow, that was horrible" horror that the rest of the country (besides Washington D.C.) lives with, but the genuine horror of smelling burnt flesh and watching people jump out of 100th-story windows of the now-gone Twin Towers—yet most of us voted against the president who went to war in our names.
His first reaction was his most coherent one.
Posted by Peter Burnet at November 9, 2004 5:03 AMDear Mr. Kuntzman,
As a fellow landsman and resident of the NYC Metro Area who voted for the re-election of George W Bush and who would have walked barefoot over broken glass in order to do so, let me advise you that Canada is only a mere 6 hour drive to the North. There you can revel in your cowardice, sanctimony and immorality to your heart's content.
Paraphrasing Horace Greeley, 'Go North, young man!'
Posted by: Bart at November 9, 2004 6:25 AMGee, I wonder why states in which few consider marriage important, also have fewer divorces?
Posted by: Randall Voth at November 9, 2004 6:30 AMBart:
Thany you, but we already have more than enough craft fairs and bluegrass festivals. You made him, you keep him.
Posted by: Peter B at November 9, 2004 6:39 AMOne does begin to wonder when the Democratic party---and those purporting to support it---will discover that insane hysteria mixed with an unhealty dose of narcissism expressed and a rhetorical tone peppered with toxic levels of profanity, vileness, vulgarity, condescension and hatred for one's country and those who respect it are a lethal combination for any political party that wishes (within a democratic framework) to attract voters.
Say it ain't so, but the fringe appears to have become the mainstream (or rather the mainstream seems to have been seduced by the easy virtues of the fringe).
God help them. God help us.
Any Kerry supporter who wants to know why their man lost, isn't getting a shred helpful insight from me -- let 'em howl in frustration.
Posted by: Twn at November 9, 2004 8:25 AMHis first reaction might be the most coherent, but his third is interesting.
Is that highest numbers of divorces per marriage, or just total number of divorces?
Posted by: Brit at November 9, 2004 8:34 AMThis is more the howl of the "trendie" than the rant of an intellectual in the true sense, and there are a lot more of the former in the Blue states than the latter. Instead of offering any rational thought or insight on issues or concepts, their main job in life is to flitter from new cause to new cause, never attempting to differentiate between something that's actually useful and what's merely something that they know about and the hicks in the sticks don't. It's how you can get your high praise of things like the the graphic Mapplethorp photo displays or for sticking a crucifix in a bottle of urine and calling it "art".
The fact that most people in the country don't want to be told by these people what is and what isn't important is also something the trendies will never see, because to do that would be to grant a rough parity to their critics' intellectual beliefs, and that would demolish much of their entire concept of themselves as being smarter than those they demean.
So when all those dullards go out and vote to re-elect Bush, people like Kuntzman aren't going to engage in any wrenching self-analysis, they're going to simply reaffirm their belief that only idiots (or the smart, but evil rich people who lead them) would vote for George W. Bush.
Peter Burnet - hey, I love your comments. You're right, his first reaction WAS the most coherent.
And Barry Meislin, well said!
Posted by: DL Meadows at November 9, 2004 12:10 PMHow can anyone take them seriously?
His comments give some credence to Edwards two Americas; Kuntzmans' and those who voted for GW including those who wish they had the integrity to.
Other than that ... intersting last name.
Posted by: genecis at November 9, 2004 12:16 PMI somehow would bet that states like Mass and New York (and Washington DC) also have the highest percentage of single mothers, unmarried parents, and teenaged pregnancies. California probably ranks right up there, too.
As has been pointed out, people can't get divorced unless they get married.
Posted by: Augie De Blieck Jr. at November 9, 2004 2:28 PMNever mind gay marriage -- here in California, we've got guys screaming at narrow-minded moralists for not letting them marry their horses and dogs.
You have not experienced surrealism until you have had a bestiality activist cop a Moral Superiority/Poor Poor Persecuted Me attitude on you. Nothing in South Park could top that.
Posted by: Ken at November 9, 2004 4:43 PMWe're actually trying to help gays copulate. As all married men know, nothing kills the urge to copulate like marriage. ;-)
Posted by: Robert Duquette at November 10, 2004 12:43 AM