October 3, 2004

THE THREE DAY STALINGRAD:

U.S., Iraqis claim win: 'It is over in Samarra' (ZIDAN KHALAF, 10/03/04, Chicago Sun-Times)

U.S. and Iraqi forces battled pockets of resistance Saturday in this former insurgent stronghold, where the American military said 125 rebels were killed and 88 captured in two days of fierce fighting.

The American commander declared the operation a successful first step in a major push to wrest key areas from insurgent control before January elections. [...]

U.S. and Iraqi commanders said they controlled 70 percent of Samarra after about 5,000 troops -- including 2,000 Iraqis and 3,000 Americans -- swept into the city early Friday. Iraqi Defense Minister Hazem Shaalan claimed success, telling the Arab television station Al-Arabiya: ''It is over in Samarra.''

Maj. Gen. John Batiste, commander of the 1st Infantry Division, said he was ''very confident that the future of Samarra is good.''

''This is great news for the people of Samarra, 200,000 people who have been held captive, hostage if you will, by just a couple of hundred thugs,'' he told CNN.

Batiste praised the performance of Iraqi troops, saying they ''really handled themselves well'' as they secured the hospital, a revered shrine and centuries-old minaret.

''They're getting better and better trained, better and better equipped. It ought to give us a lot of confidence,'' he said.

Samarra, 60 miles northwest of Baghdad, appeared mostly calm Saturday, but pockets of resistance persisted, with heavy tank shelling and exchanges of machine-gun fire erupting in early evening in the northern part of the city.


One seeming weakness in the extemists' game plan is that any time they fight us openly they get waxed at minimal loss to us, meaning they can never take control anywhere on earth for any extended period of time.

Posted by Orrin Judd at October 3, 2004 10:44 AM
Comments

You're channeling Victor Davis Hanson on Tet, but define 'extended'

Posted by: Harry Eagar at October 3, 2004 2:06 PM

Well, that's true only until Generalissimo Kerry declares victory with honor in February and pulls everyone out.

Posted by: H.D. at October 3, 2004 2:10 PM

Harry:

Whenever we decide enough have gathered to be worth killing. The difference between Al Qaeda and the Viet Cong is there is no North Vietnam.

Posted by: oj at October 3, 2004 2:12 PM

Islamic extremist forces might get waxed whenever they openly confront US forces, but what about in Afghanistan, the Khyber, Kurram, Malakand, Mohmand, and Waziristan areas of Pakistan, Chechnya, and all the other -stans of the former USSR ?

The US aren't operating overtly in every place that Islamic fundies gather, or even most.

Posted by: Michael Herdegen at October 3, 2004 5:10 PM

Because we've got others to do it for us. But they aren't going anywhere and we can do with them what we will.

Posted by: oj at October 3, 2004 11:45 PM

Now we have to take down the other strongholds in the Sunni Triangle before the election.

"Kerry -- the Last, Best Hope for Global Jihad."

Posted by: Ken at October 4, 2004 12:54 PM

You guys are ignoring the main question posed by this post, which is: Since when to right-wing, conservative Christians use the term "waxed"?

Posted by: Tom at October 4, 2004 5:50 PM
« A NATION OF OWNERS: | Main | TO LIVE AND DIE IN L.A: »