October 3, 2004
JUST SAY NO...AND SOMETIMES:
Gov. Gets Down to Business: Signing or killing bills, Schwarzenegger usually gave economic concerns more weight than social ones. But he was no doctrinaire Republican. (Jordan Rau, October 3, 2004, LA Times)
As he rebuffed legislation with an intensity rarely seen in California's Capitol, Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger's commitment to boost business generally overruled his desire to help the environment and consumers this year.He vetoed an increase in the minimum wage, he blocked consumer protections for used-car buyers, and he refused to impose new air pollution standards on the ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach. He killed all the top 10 "job killer" bills on the California Chamber of Commerce's list.
Even so, Schwarzenegger wasn't close to predictable, sometimes moving far from other Sacramento Republicans.
He created a land conservancy to protect the Sierra Nevada and banned .50-caliber guns. He agreed to let released felons receive food stamps. He legalized the sale of over-the-counter syringes — something Gov. Gray Davis, his Democratic predecessor, had refused to do.
"I was prepared to see a more sustained and consistent veto message that was more traditionally Republican than what we saw," said Don Perata, the Oakland Democrat who is the incoming Senate president pro tem.
In vetoing a near-record 25% of the bills passed by the Legislature, the governor began to show how he was balancing the various promises he made in last year's recall election. He pledged to be "the people's governor," battling special interests. He also vowed to improve the state's economy.
But when economic and social concerns clashed in dozens of less-heralded pieces of legislation, Schwarzenegger's empathy for business worries usually came out on top.
That's about as good as, or better than, conservatives could hope for from a CA governor these days. Posted by Orrin Judd at October 3, 2004 8:53 AM
Banning .50 cal's just makes sense...
Nobody hunts anything but humans with 'em.
Vetoing the higher minimum wage seems more like a symbolic gesture, rather than stopping a "job killer".
The California minimum wage is already $ 6.75/hr, and the bill would have bumped it by 50¢ an hour in July '05, and again in July '06.
Adding $ 1/hr is hardly a crushing burden, especially over 21 months.
Most minimum wage jobs are in the service industry anyhow, especially fast food, where price increases are more apt to stick. Raise the price of a premium burger by 10¢, and the new minimum wage is covered, with little consumer backlash.
Also, isn't it more efficient to have consumers directly pay slightly higher prices, and have a larger portion of gross profits go to low-income workers, rather than to pay higher taxes to grant additional benefits to low-income workers ?
Posted by: Michael Herdegen at October 3, 2004 6:08 PM"He created a land conservancy to protect the Sierra Nevada and banned .50-caliber guns. He agreed to let released felons receive food stamps. He legalized the sale of over-the-counter syringes..."
Only the land conservancy would have had a chance of passing as a ballot proposition.
Posted by: Kevin Colwell at October 4, 2004 12:57 PMArnold Schwarzenegger is a R.I.N.O. Any chance of George W. Bush winning California is nothing more than pure fantasy.
Posted by: Vince at October 4, 2004 5:54 PM