October 18, 2004
FAMILIARITY BREEDS CONTEMPT, EVEN OF PROFANITY:
Joyous Cursing: Was Dale Earnhardt Jr. right about profanity? (Frederica Mathewes-Green, 10/18/2004, Christianity Today)
As four-letter words become an ever more popular form of communication, it's hardly surprising that athletes might use them, or that one might slip out in a TV interview. NBC's Matt Yocum had just asked Dale Earnhardt Jr. how it felt to win a race at the Talladega Superspeedway for the fifth time, and he replied modestly that his famous dad, Dale Earnhardt Sr, had won there ten times. "It don't mean s---," he said.The sky fell in. Earnhardt was fined $10,000 and docked points, knocking him out of first place in the Nextel Cup series. But what's interesting is Earnhardt's defense of his naughty word.
"It was in jubilation," he said. "When you're happy and joyous about something and it happens, it's different than being angry and cursing in anger. Of course, we don't want to promote that. But if a guy's in Victory Lane, jumping up and down, and lets a 's---' slip out, I don't think that's something we need to go hammering down on."
Is he right? Does it make a difference whether the word is used in anger or exuberance? Does it matter whether it's literal or figurative? Is there a distinction among different types: obscenity, profanity, cursing, and blasphemy? [...]
English is unusually rich language, with over half a million words, about five times the size of French. If there's something you want to say, you can probably find a way to say it. Naughty words become a blank token we can stick in any sentence as a substitute for really thinking through what we're trying to say. If Earnhardt hadn't been in the habit of using this word casually, he could have come up with something equally eloquent for the occasion. I'm not particularly offended that he used this word, though I regret that such words are becoming more common while so many thousands of other words get used rarely or not at all. Our vocabulary is becoming more and more narrow, until one day the English spoken in the streets will be reduced to a few grunts and hand gestures.
But Earnhardt is right about this: it's one thing to let a word slip out in a moment of exuberance, and another to use it in anger. If the intention is to convey hatred, contempt or violence, there's a much bigger problem than just that earthy little word. (This is true even when the user is a "rebel" or "artist" and his targets are "squares.") No matter what language you use, self-righteousness and hate should be questioned, not indulged. Count to ten, and if you still feel inclined to unleash your withering scorn, here's a handy four-letter word for you: don't.
Like all ministers' sons, the Brothers grew up swearing like dockworkers. Now we both have kids and have to watch our foul mouths. fascinating thing though, swearing less often you find that you really savor the well placed cuss word. Used less they mean more. Posted by Orrin Judd at October 18, 2004 11:19 PM
>Used less they mean more.
Same goes for flashing skin, of course.
I'm quite sure that in 20 years, tops, a presidential candidate will be able to give a speech along the lines of "My opponent wants to give tax cuts to the richest Americans. Well, I say f*#@ that!"
Posted by: brian at October 18, 2004 11:31 PMI gave up cursing when my children were born. Thought it would set a bad example if I didn't. Thereafter, I realized that I had used the 'f' word to fill in thinking voids. Nonetheless, my daughter and her gal-pals today, fifteen years later, can drive me to to hard drink and swearing (almost).
Posted by: Fred Jacobsen (San Fran) at October 19, 2004 12:13 AMComedians make their living with the language, and, with rare exceptions, we make decisions early on in our careers as to exactly how much profanity will be included in our sets. And we are highly adaptable when it comes to excising profanity when the situation calls for it, or slathering on extra when the venue calls for it. We are aware at any given moment which words are allowed, which are prohibited. It's the same for anyone who is on television or speaking in public with any frequency.
Mr. Earnhardt knows damn well what he can and cannot get away with and where he can get away with it. He's in the entertainement business-- we all know the rules.
Occasionally, some Larry Lightbulb gets the idea in his head that he might push the envelope a bit-- the consequences are usually disastrous. Hair-splitting like Ms. Mathewes-Green's is ludicrous.
My main complaint about profanity is that it's usually boring and uncreative. I call for the revival of minced oaths, dag nab it, a much more colorful and amusing way of speaking which offends almost no one.
Posted by: PapayaSF at October 19, 2004 2:29 PMI just had a flash of inspiration...or maybe indigestion:
"So, Junior, how does it feel to have won today's race?"
"Wow, that's quite a question. Half a million possible words, and I'm speechless. Talk about abulia. How about, s$@#, this feels good!"
Speaking of which, did oj ever overcome his abulia about that contest a few weeks ago?
Posted by: brian at October 19, 2004 8:10 PM