October 16, 2004

DRUG WAR:

Importing Less Expensive Drugs Not Seen as Cure for U.S. Woes: Experts say that importing drugs from countries that control their prices would not make drugs cheaper in the U.S. (EDUARDO PORTER, 10/16/04, NY Times)

It may make political sense to point to Canada as a solution to high prescription drug prices in the United States. But many economists and health care experts say that importing drugs from countries that control their prices would do little to solve the problem of expensive drugs in the United States, where companies are free to set their own prices. Even the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimated that allowing Canadian drug imports would have a "negligible" impact on drug spending.

To begin with, there are not enough Canadians, or drugs in Canada, to make much of a dent in the United States. There are 16 million American patients on Lipitor, for instance - more than half the entire Canadian population.

Drug makers like Pfizer say they would reduce their shipments of drugs to distributors in Canada and other countries that re-export to the United States. "We are not going to supply drugs to diverters, in Canada or elsewhere," said Hank McKinnell, chairman and chief executive of Pfizer.

And Canadian health officials, fearing shortages and higher prices of their own, would probably clamp down on their own pharmacists and distributors to keep their drugs from leaking into the United States. Canadian patient-advocacy groups have already complained about shortages from the exports to the United States that already occur, even though they violate American law.

Even the most vehement advocates of forcing big drug makers to lower prices in this country say that imports are a rather clumsy tool. "It's a pretty crazy solution to a fairly simple problem," said James Love, director of the Consumer Project on Technology, a group advocating a lowering of drug costs. "Reimportation is not the first thing that would come to my mind."

But what comes to mind for people like Mr. Love is a political nonstarter: imposing Canadian-style price controls.


Conservatives should embrace reimportation as a way of crashing the Canadian system.

Posted by Orrin Judd at October 16, 2004 9:46 AM
Comments

The political grandstanding on the re-importation issue reflects such a basic ignorance of economics and markets that joining the argument has always seemed like a fools errand to me. Until now. The Canadian system would obviously collapse overnight if our idiot politicians had their way. Let it.

Posted by: Tom C., Stamford, Ct. at October 16, 2004 10:36 AM

I don't know, I can see it going either way. Either we destroy the Canadian price controls, or else we end up successfully adopting their price controls and wreaking havoc on drug R&D. I can't say for sure that the first alternative would happen, either.

Posted by: John Thacker at October 16, 2004 12:44 PM

Even the consumer advocate wants to make the Canadians pay more:

"American consumers are 'subsidizing everyone's R&D,' said Mr. Love, the consumer advocate. 'We're paying way more than everyone else. Others should pay more.'"

Posted by: John Thacker at October 16, 2004 12:47 PM

I don't know which is better, but I do know that I support whatever hurts Canada.

Posted by: Vince at October 16, 2004 12:47 PM

yes allow importation and because of shortages and price increase the canadian medical system would begin to fall apart and the pressure for a usa style system would increase. soon the only retionale for the existance of canada 'the health care system is better/fairer than the usa' would be gone and yes canada joins the states. plus slowly bankrupting the system and making additional profits for the usa drug companies hey whats bad about drug importation

Posted by: patrick at October 16, 2004 12:48 PM

Invade Canada!

Posted by: Robert Schwartz at October 16, 2004 12:49 PM

It's surprising that Canada isn't weighing in against re-importation. Of course, that would assume Canadian leaders understood market economics.

Posted by: Fred Jacobsen (San Fran) at October 16, 2004 1:46 PM

Crashing Canada... What an interesting proposition.

Posted by: Ptah at October 16, 2004 3:06 PM

Is there a way we can crash France as well, or maybe first?

Posted by: Uncle Bill at October 16, 2004 6:36 PM

Robert,

And resistance will be minimal after a year or two of no 'Hockey Night in Canada'!!

Posted by: TimF at October 17, 2004 12:03 AM
« MEET THE NEXT MAYOR OF D.C.: | Main | A MODEL: »