October 9, 2004
A NUANCED WAY OF SAYING CABANA BOY LOST:
The Town Hall Debate (NY Times, 10/09/04)
Mr. Kerry demonstrated, at the very minimum, a stature that
was equal to the president's.
So other than being tall, he got his pumice stone handed to him.
MORE:
Strikeout: Kerry blows the second debate. (William Saletan, Oct. 9, 2004, Slate)
In honor of the baseball playoffs, I've borrowed the metaphor of a ninth-inning rally to describe the Democrats' October comeback. In the first presidential debate, John Kerry got the lead-off hit. In the vice-presidential encounter Tuesday night, John Edwards singled him to third. I guess they substituted a pinch runner (that's the problem with metaphors), because tonight Kerry was back at the plate. It was a long at-bat, with lots of hanging sliders thrown by President Bush. Kerry fouled off a few, whiffed a couple, and struck out looking.Bush did well. He botched a few answers—at one point, he said our military should be "more facile"—but he was well-prepared, energetic, and frequently incisive. Democrats thought he'd have trouble fielding hostile questions. They were wrong. Five minutes in, a questioner asked him why Saddam Hussein's theoretical ability to produce weapons of mass destruction was grounds for invasion, given that many other countries meet this standard. Bush tacked the question without hesitation. He said that 9/11 had changed the rules and that a new report from U.S. weapons inspector Charles Duelfer showed Saddam "was gaming the oil-for-food program to get rid of sanctions" and "restart his weapons programs." Later, a questioner told Bush that the Patriot Act "weakens American citizens' rights." Bush respectfully disagreed and explained why.
Kerry, too, was well-prepared, energetic, and incisive. But he failed to do two things that Edwards did against Vice President Cheney. Edwards, like Bush, has message discipline. From the beginning to the end of Tuesday's debate, Edwards hammered one theme: "Mr. Vice President, you are still not being straight with the American people." At the same time, Edwards adapted to the flow of the debate, using Cheney's answers to reinforce the theme. Each time Cheney said something far-fetched, Edwards took that statement and beat it against the cement of reality.
Kerry did neither of those things tonight.
If you're using baseball metaphors, Dick Cheney treated John Edwards like Juan Marichal did Johnny Roseboro. Posted by Orrin Judd at October 9, 2004 3:33 PM
One can imagine Gail Collins and the rest of the Times' editorial board dressed up as Monty Python's Spanish Inquisition crew, breaking into the end of the debate and demanding Bush confess his errors, or face the pain of the soft cushions or the comfy chair.
Posted by: John at October 9, 2004 4:42 PMGod, a gratuitous Giants reference. What a great site!
Posted by: JimGooding at October 9, 2004 7:04 PM"Noooobody expects the New York Times Editorial Board. Amongst our chief weapons are fear, surprise, a ruthless efficiency and an almost fanatical devotion to the Democratic Party."
Posted by: Raoul Ortega at October 9, 2004 7:05 PM*Almost* fanatical?
Posted by: Joe at October 9, 2004 9:02 PMCardinal Krugman will now read the charges...
Posted by: John at October 10, 2004 12:01 AMJoe;
The Democratic Party is not always sufficiently leftist for the New York Times.
Posted by: Annoying Old Guy at October 10, 2004 1:36 PMThe NYTimes is Officially Unbiased, don't cha know.
Posted by: Robert Schwartz at October 10, 2004 11:07 PM