September 15, 2004

WHEN DID YOU STOP BEATING YOUR WIFE?:

Dan Rather To Bush: ‘Answer The Questions’ (Joe Hagan, 89/15/04, NY Observer)

"With respect: answer the questions," said Dan Rather, the CBS News anchor. He was asking a direct question to President George W. Bush, his re-election campaign and his political allies in the press and on the Web. "We’ve heard what you have to say about the documents and what you’ve said and what your surrogates have said, but for the moment, answer the questions.

"I say that with respect," he added. "They’d be a lot stronger in their campaign if they did do that."

On Tuesday, Sept. 14, Mr. Rather remained steadfast despite a brutal onslaught of criticism from Bush defenders—including Laura Bush—critics and competing news organizations over the authenticity of memos reportedly typed by Lt. Col. Jerry Killian, Mr. Bush’s squadron commander in the early 1970’s, which suggested that Killian felt pressure from his superior to "sugarcoat" negative evaluations of the future President’s performance.

Since 60 Minutes reported on those documents on Wednesday, Sept. 8, their veracity has been assaulted by Web critics, politicians and document experts who put the burden of proof on Mr. Rather, his producers and on CBS News, and say that the reputation of the news organization is at stake.

Mr. Rather asserted that the lack of denial was itself evidence of the essential truth of his findings.


Not dignifying a lie with an answer proves its truth? Is that really CBS's standard?

MORE:
Dan Rather, Terry McAuliffe and those phony papers (Byron York, 9/15/04, The Hill)

Dan Rather may have trouble finding supporters these days, but he’s always got one at 430 S. Capitol St.

That’s the address of the Democratic National Committee (DNC), where on Tuesday DNC chairman Terry McAuliffe called in the press to unveil what he called “Operation: Fortunate Son.”

A prominent part of McAuliffe’s new campaign is a video that details the ways in which George W. Bush allegedly received preferential treatment in the Texas Air National Guard.

It’s the standard anti-Bush line. “Where was he?” the narrator asks of the future president. “And why did he miss his physical? This son of privilege. This fortunate son.”

McAuliffe’s video includes a clip from the now-notorious CBS “60 Minutes” program in which Rather relied on apparently forged documents said to have been written by Bush’s superior officer. CBS quickly asked the Democrats to remove the network’s footage from the video — which seemed counterproductive, since McAuliffe’s was the biggest vote of confidence Rather has gotten lately.


Using the CBS standard can we assume that Mr. Rather's failure to deny that he's in cahoots with the DNC confirms that he is?

USA Today Probe Could Spell Trouble for CBS News: Documents on Bush’s Service in National Guard Under Review (RODERICK BOYD, 9/15/04, NY Sun)

USA Today’s willingness to investigate the authenticity of documents it and CBS News used in stories questioning President Bush’s Air National Guard Service may set off a feeding frenzy on CBS News if it turns out the documents were faked,the chairmen of two of America’s top journalism departments said yesterday.

CBS said it stands by the story it ran on September 8 in which it broke the news of the documents, which alleged that Mr. Bush used political pressure to get out of the Guard early.

USA Today — which ran a front-page story last Thursday using the same documents — carried a story on Monday in which the paper’s executive editor, John Hillkirk, said the paper has become aware of questions about the documents’ authenticity and is pursuing those concerns “aggressively.”


-Forgery row threatens to derail Kerry (Julian Borger, September 16, 2004, The Guardian
The problems dogging John Kerry's presidential campaign deepened yesterday as a row over the authenticity of documents about George Bush's National Guard service took centre stage. {...]

"The 'forgeries' have become the story, not the story itself," David Corn, the Washington editor of the Nation magazine, said.

The timing of the appearance of the documents has led some Democrats to wonder if they had been put into circulation to discredit the anti-Bush effort. Fingers have begun to point - as they often do among Democrats - at Karl Rove, the president's electoral mastermind.

"If this is Rove, it is his greatest masterpiece," a Kerry campaign adviser said yesterday.

The rumours may say more about the extraordinary powers attributed to Mr Rove by his adversaries than about the facts.

CBS Guard Documents Traced to Tex. Kinko's: Records Reportedly Faxed From Abilene (Michael Dobbs, September 16, 2004, Washington Post)

Documents allegedly written by a deceased officer that raised questions about President Bush's service with the Texas Air National Guard bore markings showing they had been faxed to CBS News from a Kinko's copy shop in Abilene, Tex., according to another former Guard officer who was shown the records by the network.

The markings provide one piece of evidence suggesting a source for the documents, whose authenticity has been hotly disputed since CBS aired them in a "60 Minutes" broadcast Sept. 8. The network has declined to name the person who provided them, saying the source was confidential, or to explain how the documents came to light after more than three decades.

There is only one Kinko's in Abilene, and it is 21 miles from the Baird, Tex., home of retired Texas National Guard officer Bill Burkett, who has been named by several news outlets as a possible source for the documents. [...]

Burkett, who served with the Texas National Guard in an administrative capacity before his 1998 retirement, has been involved in a bitter dispute with the Guard over medical benefits after suffering from a tropical disease following a military assignment in Panama. He has told reporters that he had a nervous breakdown and was hospitalized for depression after he left the Guard.

Posted by Orrin Judd at September 15, 2004 7:04 PM
Comments

It's really kind of funny that the latest Dem attack on Bush is based on the idea that he was a "fortunate son" with family connections. In contrast to John Kerry, who was born in a log cabin?

Posted by: PapayaSF at September 15, 2004 8:16 PM

PapayaSF:

Consistent with OJs assertion that comedy is inherently conservative, irony is simply beyond the Left.

Posted by: Jeff Guinn at September 15, 2004 8:35 PM

Well, I suppose the Democrats would say Kerry could have pulled wires but was too decent not to.

Republicans would say he was an opportunist who served just enough to punch his political ticket.

No doubt the Left is in deep denial. Don Gonyea of NPR led off his report today that "questions persist" about Bush's Guard service.

So they do, but only at NPR and CBS.

In this era of corporate watchdogging, the apparent delay by CBS in releasing its statement about the letters could be interesting.

A naive Rightwing blogger speculated that the delay was to get Viacom past the market bell, so the stock wouldn't take a hit.

Uh uh. That's Reaganite thinking. If you know something that is expected to materially affect the company, you've got to get it out promptly.

No doubt Rove has his henchmen already preparing the documents demanding an SEC investigation.

Posted by: Harry Eagar at September 15, 2004 8:42 PM

I particularly like the fact that Fogerty served in the National Guard. I nice example of the truth being neater than anyone would dare write in fiction.

Posted by: David Cohen at September 15, 2004 9:06 PM

I am watching this story in amazement, and checking to see if my drink has been spiked with mescaline. What could cause CBS to delay for so long, and what could cause them to not admit the obvious? It is really peculiar. The defense "the story is true even if the documents are false" is weird, too. Does CBS really think we're going to accept that?

Just what in the bleep is going on here?

Many have speculated, reasonably, that the source is someone so big, and the revelation so terrible, that the revelation cannot happen. I think the answer is likely simpler - CBS simply cannot accept they made a grave error and are digging an ever deeper hole.

Posted by: Bruce Cleaver at September 15, 2004 9:31 PM

What if the docs came from Rather's daughter who's active in the Texas Democrats. It would explain the reticence on his part to give up the forger.

Posted by: Jeff at September 15, 2004 9:35 PM

FWIW, the Tradesports contract on the re-election of Bush just jumped to 66.1

Posted by: Bruce Cleaver at September 15, 2004 9:38 PM

Agree with Bruce - the "it's accurate because I say it is" is a really weird (and poor) defense. Also that since CBS won't divulge the source it must be an important one in some way.
Bruce - that 66.1 number - is that the percentage of people who think Bush will win or the projected share of the vote Bush will get?

Posted by: AWW at September 15, 2004 11:02 PM

CBS really wouldn't want to give up Chris Lehane (or Harold Ickes, or Howard Wolfson, or anyone else associated with the Clintons), now would they? That is even more plausible than one of Rather's Texas cronies.

Posted by: ratbert at September 15, 2004 11:26 PM

Ok, maybe it's the five Newcastle's I've had tonight or maybe it's just the killer buzz one gets from a really good hit of schadenfreude, but I think I can reconstruct a chain of custody that explains Rather's behavior.

Remember March 21, 2001? Danny boy appears at the Travis County Democrats' Club as the main speaker at a $20,000 fund-raiser. Who hosted the event? His daughter Robin Rather, an environmental activist, marketing exec, and potential Austin Mayoral candidate. Who else was in attendance? Ben Barnes, former Lt. Governor and major fund raiser for the Kerry Campaign this year. So my theory goes like this - Barnes is in the tank for Kerry, but he doesn't know enough about the military to actually forge the memos. Enter former Lt. Col Bill Burkett, a 28 year veteran and longtime Bush critic who's past is so checkered even the MSM won't use him to attack Bush, but...

Burkett writes up the memos and delivers them to Barnes. Barnes gives a copy to Robin Rather who forwards them to the Kerry camp, The Kerry camp turns over the memos to CBS saying basically - "hey, check these out - we can't say where we got them from but may you can find someone to verify them." Ben Barnes contacts CBS at Robin's suggestion, and says, "hey, check out these memos I got from Jerry Killian's files." Dan says, "Wow. The exact same memos!" and the rest is history.

Of coure Dan can't drop the story now. When you factor in the size of Dan's ego and the degree to which he's devoted himself to building a journalistic "legacy" there's only only thing that makes sense, he's protecting his daughter.

Posted by: Robert Modean at September 16, 2004 12:18 AM

The problem with your scenario is that a Lt.Col. should have gotten more of the details right. I suspect that there's some Moore-on who did these almost as a joke, passed them to a few friends and like some recombinant bacterial experiment gone bad, they escaped quarantine into the wild. (Then again, it would seem the forger didn't know much about Word, either.)

Having Robin involved would be a delicious irony, wouldn't it? Sure would explain why Kenneth is protecting the source.

Posted by: Raoul Ortega at September 16, 2004 12:36 AM

Whoever they're trying to protect, it looks like Burkett is going to be the fall guy. The question is did he keep around evidence of his dealings with any DNC types?

Posted by: brian at September 16, 2004 12:40 AM

Robert: not a bad bit of armchair detective work! Allow me to suggest this: the fact that Dan's bosses are still trying to back him up suggests to me that there's more. Why doesn't CBS or CBS News try to save their reputation and announce Dan's sudden retirement? This is certain to hurt them, badly, and the more they fight it, the worse it'll be. Does Dan have leverage with them? Or are the stakes bigger? What if part of the chain of custody includes some combination of a 527, a Democratic bigwig and a CBS executive? What if it turns out to be illegal coordination between a 527 and the Democrats, with CBS knowingly aiding this violation of campaign finance reform laws? Yup, the same laws pushed by Democrats, CBS, and various liberal groups. The Dems would have a Watergate on their hands, 527s could have their nonprofit status revoked, and the owners of the CBS News brand might start thinking about changing the name to improve their public image. Something like "Enron Asbestos" would probably test higher.

Maybe CBS is stonewalling to protect a lot more than Dan and his producers.

Posted by: PapayaSF at September 16, 2004 1:06 AM

oj has written before of being on the wrong side of a 60-40 issue. If CBS has broadcast wrongful charges against a commander-in-chief in a time of war based upon forged documents, then that's an 85-15 issue (I'm ashamed to say that its not 100-0).

Posted by: Fred Jacobsen (San Fran) at September 16, 2004 6:01 AM

AWW -

It's a futures contract, and the price is roughly the percentage chance that Bush will win the election. Kerry's is at 32 this morning, and the remainder must be for a summation of 3rd party chances.

Posted by: Bruce Cleaver at September 16, 2004 6:24 AM

For Karl Rove it must be tough being an eeeeeeeeeeevil genius!! lol

Posted by: Bill from NYC at September 16, 2004 8:08 AM

If Rove really pulled this off, the word 'genius' is staggeringly inadequate as a description of his ability.

Posted by: Bruce Cleaver at September 16, 2004 8:35 AM

Bruce - thanks - that's what I figured.

Posted by: AWW at September 16, 2004 8:38 AM

Bruce:

If Rove did this, we should go ahead and create that office of National Intellegence Director and put him in it!

Posted by: mike earl at September 16, 2004 10:14 AM

Harry:

How do you think Kerry got first the kushy Navy assignment and then the safe Swift Boat gig?

Posted by: oj at September 16, 2004 11:00 AM

>In contrast to John Kerry, who was born in a
>log cabin?

remember your doubleplusgoodthink, comrade.
oceania has never been at war with eurasia.
oceania has never been at war with eurasia.
oceania has never been at war with eurasia.
...

Posted by: Ken at September 16, 2004 3:45 PM

Safe? Of the 3 jgs who went up the river,only 2 came back

Posted by: Harry Eagar at September 16, 2004 8:53 PM

Harry:

Yes, he's spoken of how angry he was when the Swift Boats were moved from coastal patrols to actual combat roles.

Posted by: oj at September 17, 2004 8:44 AM

But he went.

That's what happens when you accept military discipline.

Posted by: Harry Eagar at September 17, 2004 3:41 PM

And?

Posted by: oj at September 17, 2004 5:16 PM

He got shot at.

You could, and should, let it go there

Posted by: Harry Eagar at September 18, 2004 11:34 PM

So what? He tried avoiding getting shot at and he failed. Having been shot at he came home and disgraced himself. Millions of guys have been shot at and remained cretins.

Posted by: oj at September 19, 2004 8:38 AM
« VIET DINH IN 2024: | Main | AN IL WIND: »