September 10, 2004

THEY WATCH THE WATCHERS:

CBS'S BIG BLUNDER? (JOHN PODHORETZ , 9/10/04, NY Post)

CBS made the four documents available in their original form on its Web site Wednesday night.

And by yesterday morning, they were being examined with a fine tooth comb.

The Minneapolis lawyers who run powerlineblog.com were on the case early. Two of the blog's readers directed their attention to a note left on an Internet bulletin board on the freerepublic.com Web site — the 47th posting on the topic there.

Post No. 47 pointed out that there was something off about these documents from the 1970s: The spacing between the letters and the words was proportional, and only a few IBM electric typewriters could achieve that effect back then.

From there it was off to the races. Once anyone who had had experience writing and typing in the 1970s began examining the documents, it was impossible not to see some weird anachronisms that suggested they had been crafted not on a 1970s typewriter, but using Microsoft Word.

Charles Johnson, who runs the wonderful littlegreenfootballs.com, simply typed one of the memos over using Microsoft Word's New Times Roman font and, lo and behold, the document came out exactly identical to the one on the CBS site, down to the letter spacing.

The documents contain such features as superscript lettering, which is done automatically by Microsoft Word, and curly quotation marks. A brief glance at a Web site called selectric.org, run by an amateur typewriter fanatic, reveals dozens of IBM electric typefaces — and none of them has curly quotation marks.

By 3 o'clock, the very careful and honest Jim Geraghty, who produces invaluable material every day on nationalreview.com's Kerry Spot, was saying flatly, "CBS had better have one heck of a defense for this."

Posted by Orrin Judd at September 10, 2004 8:27 AM
Comments

Meanwhile, at a building a few blocks from the Post's offices, master economist and scourge of Republican politicans everywhere, Paul Krugman, goes into major spin mode on the current budget deficit, using the new National Guard claims as his starting point.

I would guess the Times has earlier deadlines for its op-ed page than the Post does, though even if Paul had waited a few extra hours to find out that people ideoloigically on his side were questioning the truthfulness of the documents, it would have only altered a few words at best in the screed.

Posted by: John at September 10, 2004 9:01 AM

One notes that both the Times and the Boston Globe, which the Times owns and which has been leading the charge on the purported memos, are suspiciously silent on their front pages today whereas it's plastered all over the WaPo's front page and ABC is blaring it to the skies.

Posted by: Joe at September 10, 2004 9:54 AM

Yet note how reluctant the MSM are to even acknowledge the exuistence of blogs or their role in this.

Posted by: Peter B at September 10, 2004 10:07 AM

Will NPR re-interview Walter Robinson (Boston Globe editor), who sounded like a deeply saddened Tom Daschle as he described what the Globe had discovered in the documents?

Tom Clancy couldn't have written a better script.

Dan Rather has now become a caricature, almost like some of the characters Tom Wolfe creates in his novels. Maybe Rather can do the Dean scream on the news tonight.

Posted by: jim hamlen at September 10, 2004 10:32 AM

Instapundit links to a "newly discovered" memo from the NVA to Lt. John Kerry from 1969.

Here is the link

Posted by: pchuck at September 10, 2004 10:41 AM

"Yet note how reluctant the MSM are to even acknowledge the exuistence of blogs or their role in this."

Did the Dinosaur acknowledge the Mammal?

Posted by: Robert Duquette at September 10, 2004 12:07 PM
« TO PRESENT THE DETAILS DON'T YOU NEED A PROGRAM?: | Main | DUAL WON THE DUEL: »