September 5, 2004
THE ENCHANTED KINGDOM
Europe's Iran Fantasy (Leon de Winter, Weekly Standard, September 6th, 2004)
All but a handful of Europe's politicians, obsessed by the specter of electoral defeat, refuse to take a stand if doing so could force them to sacrifice lives. Post-historical and post-religious Europe, born in the shadow of the Holocaust, does not see sacrifice as legitimate. Of course, considering that Europe has nurtured some of the world's cruelest ideologies, the dread of scenarios that might require sacrifice is hardly surprising. The problem is that much of the world, especially the Arab Islamic parts of it, is simply not interested in the moral and ethical implications of Europe's bloody past.Posted by Peter Burnet at September 5, 2004 5:00 PMSince Auschwitz--the benchmark of ideological and political developments in Europe--the miracle of European prosperity and freedom has not led to the conviction that this prosperity and freedom must be defended, if necessary by force; on the contrary, the miracle has given birth to an attitude of cultural relativism and pacifism. It is as if modern Europe had divested itself of its idealistic and historical context, as if many Europeans saw the miracle of a prosperous and free Europe as an ahistorical, natural, and permanent state of affairs--as if Auschwitz had been wiped from their memory.
But anyone who is ignorant of, or ignores, the fact that tens of millions of Europeans died in the twentieth century in the struggle between good and evil--and it seems most Europeans have simply forgotten this--will fail to appreciate that the continued existence of Europe's system of liberal moral and ethical values is the result of conscious choices by courageous Europeans (and many others).
It may be something worse than amnesia: Today's Europeans may see the history of the twentieth century as scarred only by an abstract process known by the ancient Germanic word "war," a concept that for them represents some monstrous destructive force beyond good and evil that blindly spews out victims, like a flood or a hurricane. Most Europeans no longer regard Auschwitz as the disastrous result of evil ideas and the evil decisions of human beings. Instead, they see it as the consequence of something more like a natural disaster.[...]
The European landscape is littered from north to south and east to west with monuments to battles and massacres. Many of them commemorate distant conflicts that now are hard to understand, but some mark the struggle against the most recent European evils: the right-wing totalitarian fascism of Nazi Germany and the left-wing totalitarian fascism of the Soviet Union. Although carved in stone, their lessons have not been learned. For most Europeans, the monuments no longer speak to Western civilization of the essential choice between good and evil. Instead, the memorials to the millions who died, from American soldiers to murdered civilians, stand for a faraway world that today's European, safe in his postmodern cultural relativism, thinks he has long since left behind: a world as distant as the Ice Age, plagued by an abstract phenomenon called "war."
It's my impression that Europeans see Auschwitz as the natural end of "war" and have lost the notion that wars can be waged for noble causes.
Posted by: brian at September 5, 2004 5:05 PMOrrin, how long did you have to look to find a guy who thinks European pacifism started after Auschwitz?
Posted by: Harry Eagar at September 5, 2004 5:14 PMThe West Europeans have been taught that nothing is worth fighting for. The Jihadniks have been taught to kill for Islam. On whom would you bet?
Posted by: Bart at September 5, 2004 5:23 PMHarry:
Of course it didn't start there, but it triumphed there.
Posted by: Peter B at September 5, 2004 5:36 PMDepleted by the 20th century, Europe has lost its nerve. More than that, it has lost any sense that Western culture deserves to continue. Those in power just hope there is enough in the treasury to see it through a comfortable old age and the hospice experience. The generations to come can go hang as far as this cohort is concerned. The Moslems in Europe in increasing numbers are still primitive enough for vigor. The future belongs to them.
Posted by: Jerry at September 5, 2004 5:44 PMThe near future may belong to European Muslims, but even if so, unless they gain a commanding expertise of democracy and technological innovation, they'll merely be passing rulers of Europe, fairly quickly supplanted by Africans or Slavs.
Posted by: Michael Herdegen at September 5, 2004 11:25 PMSorry, Michael.
The Muslims only need to keep breeding, and they will outnumber the Euros. Spain's population under the Moors was overwhelmingly Christian. That will not been the case in Moorish Holland or Moorish Wallonia. It is not the case in Moorish Marseille or the Moorish Ceinture Rouge. The Moors held onto SPain for 700 years by killing people, not through their knowledge of technology or certainly democracy. Technology was for unarmed non-Muslims to use. Only by comparison with the Spain of Isabella the Genocidal Maniac can Moorish Spain be said to have been a decent society.
Posted by: Bart at September 6, 2004 8:16 AM