Gee. What would they do if they were mean enough? If Bush is a sissy, what does Frank call Bill Clinton? Tell me again why this is the official paper of record?

But Orrin, Frank Rich has nothing to offer but venom and bile. Remember the way he lashed into Mel Gibson for daring to make The Passion?

The irrelevance of Rich's supposed area of expertise to anything significant has never stopped the flow of his vitriol before. Why should things change now?

Jeff:

My Stallion?

How did that dark genius Karl Rove actually GET Frank Rich, Maureen Dowd, and Terry McAulliffe to work for him anyway?

Nothing is surprizing from the formerly respectable NY Times.

In Frank's circle, that is a term of endearment.

This has been a persistent thought of mine for awhile now but I've been thinking about investing in pharmaceuticals and mental health care. If Bush wins in November I expect alot of people like Mr. Rich to be committed, either voluntarily or involuntarily, to extensive therapy involving medication. There could be a windfall in the offing.

Well, think of all those jobs that will need to be filled.....

If it weren't for the copyright laws, I'd print up a million copies of Rich's screed - and Kerry's spewing last night - and distribute them through the battleground states. Every one of them ought to be worth a vote for Bush. The Dems are about to learn the immutable law that hysteria _always_ ends up boomeranging on you in the end.

Doesn't he know that Bush was either working undercover for the secret SUMS agency (as Jason
Gay reported in Esquire) or was fronting for
the company in South America; probably Chile;
as uber moonbat Daniel Hopnicker suggests

Frank Rich came very close to being punched out by Walter Matthau. When Rich was drama critic, he was famous for writing reviews without having seen the performance, relying on word-of-mouth.

Another thing to understand about Rich is that his father was on Marion Barry's payroll down in DC.

Frank Rich has long been a one-note Johnny, much too much concerned with the whole male sexuality issue, and with George Bush and Mel Gibson in particular. What is his problem?

This is just one woman's observation.

Rich's screed seems designed to justify the Times' cutting him down to twice-monthly status, while making Paul Krugman look mature and level-headed by comparison. As for Maureen, I'm expecting her to label Bush a doo-doo head any day now...