September 20, 2004

MORE PLUMBERS CRACK:

Kerry Aide Talked to Retired Guard Officer (AP 9/21/04)

At the behest of CBS, an adviser to John Kerry said he talked to a central figure in the controversy over President Bush's National Guard service shortly before disputed documents were released.

Joe Lockhart denied any connection between the presidential campaign and the papers. Lockhart, the second Kerry ally to confirm contact with retired Texas National Guard officer Bill Burkett, said he made the call at the suggestion of CBS producer Mary Mapes.

"He had some advice on how to deal with the Vietnam issue and the Swift boat" allegations, Lockhart said Monday, referring to GOP-fueled accusations that Kerry exaggerated his Vietnam War record. "He said these guys play tough and we have to put the Vietnam experience into context and have Kerry talk about it more."


The American people need to know their Democratic candidate is not a crook. The emerging ties, however, between the mentally disturbed Mr. Burkett, CBS News and at least two members of the Kerry camp--Mr. Lockhart and Max Cleland--raises serious questions about whether this is not some kind of Nixonian dirty trick.

MORE:
CBS arranged for meeting with Lockhart (Kevin Johnson, Dave Moniz and Jim Drinkard, 9/20/04, USA TODAY)

CBS arranged for a confidential source to talk with Joe Lockhart, a top aide to Democratic presidential candidate John Kerry, after the source provided the network with the now-disputed documents about President Bush's service in the Texas National Guard. [...]

Burkett told USA TODAY that he had agreed to turn over the documents to CBS if the network would help arrange a conversation with the Kerry campaign.

The network's effort to place Burkett in contact with a top Democratic official raises ethical questions about CBS' handling of material potentially damaging to the Republican president in the midst of an election. This "poses a real danger to the potential credibility of a news organization," said Aly Colón, a news ethicist at the Poynter Institute for Media Studies.


That was quick--Mr. Lockhart seems not to have been quite forthcoming in his description of his role in the affair in that earlier story--that Mr. Burkett would only give up the documents if CBS put him in touch with a Kerry operative. Quid pro quo? Joe must go!

CBS backs off Guard story (Dave Moniz, Kevin Johnson and Jim Drinkard, 9/21/04, USA TODAY)

CBS News acknowledged Monday that it received disputed documents critical of President Bush's service in the Texas Air National Guard from a former Texas Guard officer who now says he lied about where he got them and has doubts about their authenticity. [...]

In interviews in recent days with USA TODAY, both in person and on the phone, Burkett said he had merely been a conduit for the records purported to be from the private files of Lt. Col. Jerry Killian, one of Bush's former Guard commanders, who died in 1984. Burkett admitted lying to USA TODAY about the source of the documents but said he did not fabricate the papers.

In earlier conversations with USA TODAY, Burkett had identified the source of the documents as George Conn, a former Texas National Guard colleague who works for the U.S. Army in Europe. Burkett now says he made up the story about Conn's involvement to divert attention from himself and the woman he now says provided him with the documents. He told USA TODAY that he also lied to CBS.

Burkett now maintains that the source of the papers was Lucy Ramirez, who he says phoned him from Houston in March to offer the documents. USA TODAY has been unable to locate Ramirez.

When Burkett gave copies of the documents to USA TODAY, it was on the understanding that his identity would not be disclosed. USA TODAY honored that agreement until Burkett waived his confidentiality Monday.

"I didn't forge anything," Burkett said. "I didn't fake any documents. The only thing I've done here is to transfer documents from people I thought were real to people I thought were real. And that has been the limitation of my role. I may have been a patsy." [...]

Burkett's emotions varied widely in the interviews. One session ended when Burkett suffered a violent seizure and collapsed in his chair. Earlier, he said he was coming forward now to explain what he had done and why to try to salvage his reputation. In the past week, Burkett was named by many news reports as the probable source of the documents. [...]

Burkett said Ramirez told him she had seen him the previous month in an appearance on the MSNBC program Hardball, discussing the controversy over whether Bush fulfilled all his obligations for service in the Texas Air Guard during the early 1970s. "There is something I have that I want to make sure gets out," he quoted her as saying.

He said Ramirez claimed to possess Killian's "correspondence file," which would prove Burkett's allegations that Bush had problems as a Guard fighter pilot.

Burkett said he arranged to get the documents during a trip to Houston for a livestock show in March. But instead of being met at the show by Ramirez, he was approached by a man who asked for Burkett, handed him an envelope and quickly left, Burkett recounted.

"I didn't even ask any questions," Burkett said. "Should I have? Yes. Maybe I was duped. I never really even considered that."

By Monday, USA TODAY had not been able to locate Ramirez or verify other details of Burkett's account. Three people who worked with Killian in the early 1970s said they don't recognize her name. Burkett promised to provide telephone records that would verify his calls to Ramirez, but he had not done so by Monday night.

Posted by Orrin Judd at September 20, 2004 10:30 PM
Comments

Remember that lawyer dude a couple of weeks ago, who no one had ever heard of, and now no one remembers, who was "proof" that the Swift Boat Vets were in cahoots with the Bush campaign? And here we have Lockhart and Cleland, not exactly low-level campaign staffers, admitting they talked to Burkett. And Lockhart says he was told to contact Burkett by Mapes! The mind truly boggles. No fiction writer could have come up with this. But surely more will come out, as prisoner's dilemma-type shenanigans ensure we get to read all the juicy details...

Posted by: brian at September 20, 2004 10:51 PM

> said Aly Colón, a news ethicist

Hope the guy has lots of hobbies--his job certainly can't keep him very busy!

Posted by: at September 20, 2004 10:59 PM

As someone who is supposed to be out there spinning for his candidate, Lockhart is in the worst position in this, unless he decides to do a Kerry and only deal with "non-threatening" media like Jon Stewart, Dr. Phil or Regis for the duration of ths scandal.

Meanwhile, Mapes appears set up to be the fall gal for CBS in this, though it will be interesting to see whether or not she's willing to take a bullet for the boys at Black Rock. However, given her reported past anti-Bush pronouncements and her efforts on the Abu Ghirab scandal, it's entirely possible she quietly could be given a "Golden Parachute" by some sympathetic group that would allow Mary to accept the blame in echange for landing on her feet with another high-paying job at some other organization until the heat dies down.

Posted by: John at September 20, 2004 11:12 PM

Joe must flip. How many layers between this Bishop and the Queen?

Posted by: Rip at September 20, 2004 11:13 PM

The White House needs to decertify CBS. John Roberts needs to pack up his things, and Bob Schiefer cannot be allowed to moderate a presidential debate. Especially in a presidential election that CBS News tried so desperately to throw.

Posted by: Melissa at September 21, 2004 12:32 AM

Melissa:

From what I read, viewers are decertifying CBS. I suspect that White House leaks about objecting to Bob Schiefer are merely a softening-up technique to put him under a spotlight, and therefore motivate him to be ultra-nice during the debate he moderates.

Posted by: Fred Jacobsen (San Fran) at September 21, 2004 12:38 AM

Kerry isn't a crook. He is a dingbat.

Posted by: Robert Schwartz at September 21, 2004 12:56 AM

oj wrote " . . . some kind of Nixonian dirty trick . . . "

Remember Dick Tuck. The anti-Nixonian dirty trickster.

Joe must go!

Posted by: Fred Jacobsen (San Fran) at September 21, 2004 6:30 AM

In the US' #1 TV market, NYC, on Sept. 14th, (last Tuesday), CBS' 'EVENING NEWS with Dan Rather' placed LAST in the Nielsen ratings, beaten by re-runs of 'The Simpsons' and 'Will & Grace'.

Out of the nation's top ten TV markets, CBS news trails ABC and NBC in all but San Francisco.

Posted by: Michael Herdegen at September 21, 2004 7:23 AM

Brian - it was Ginsberg. Agree that this very minor connection (Ginsberg had both Bush and the Swift Vets as clients) pales in comparison to the contacts/links being discovered between CBS, DNC, and Kerry campaign on this item.

Posted by: AWW at September 21, 2004 8:09 AM

I'm in the process of creating a Microsoft Word document, dated August 8th, 2004 that will bear Kerry's signature and authorize the creation of the phoney CBS docs. The same document will suggest that the phony docs be funnelled to CBS via Joe Lockhart, Max Cleland and Bill Burkett.

In the same document, Burkett will be offered a cabinet position in a Kerry administration - possibly Secretary of Defense.

I will do this,(and if I am held to the same standard as CBS, get away with it) because the information may be true.

This morning on Imus, Andy Rooney reiterated that the "in case it may be true/CBS standard". According to Rooney, the fact that it "may be true" makes it "fair game".

Indeed!

To quote CBS (9-10-04)

"THIS REPORT [was based on] a preponderance of evidence, including documents that were provided by unimpeachable sources .. ".

Posted by: Sydney T at September 21, 2004 11:10 AM

Man. This story gets stranger and stranger. Woman with confidential file calls out crazy man out of the blue, unknown man giving documents at livestock show. Reads like a bad spy novel.

Posted by: Bob at September 21, 2004 11:16 AM

Sydney - Sounds like it'll work to me. After all, not holding a Constitutional office you can't be impeached, so you must be an unimpeachable source.

Posted by: pj at September 21, 2004 9:03 PM

Burkette seems to be going with the "It was a one-armed man !" defense.

Posted by: Michael Herdegen at September 22, 2004 6:16 AM
« CAN'T REST ON YOUR LAUREATES: | Main | BAN SOCCER, KEEP THE HUNT: »