September 10, 2004
IF ONLY THEY WERE A SIGNIFICANT ENOUGH NATION TO BE WORTH DESPISING:
Forces refused U.S. Request out of Iraq fears: Illustrates politicized military, defence analyst says (Chris Wattie, September 10, 2004, National Post)
Canada rejected a U.S. request to send a squadron of CF-18 fighter-bombers to Afghanistan last year because of concerns that it might free more American forces for the invasion of Iraq, according to internal Defence Department documents.In documents obtained under the Access to Information Act, the two top generals in the Canadian Forces agreed that a six-month deployment of as many as 18 aircraft to the air base in Manas, Kyrgyzstan, was "deemed feasible" but recommended against the proposal because of concerns over the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq. [...]
[D]efence critics called the decision questionable and decried it as an example of the politicization of the Canadian military.
Gordon O'Connor, the Conservative defence critic, said the Canadian fighters would have been a valuable addition to the campaign to root out the last holdouts of the Taliban and al-Qaeda.
"Our guys are very good fighter pilots," he said. "They have an excellent reputation.... The U.S. wanted the Canadians there because they knew they'd do a good job."
Mr. O'Connor said that both the Liberal government and the Canadian Forces appear to put political considerations ahead of military ones. "It would seem they're more concerned about appearances than fighting the war on terrorism."
Not that their appearance is so hot. Posted by Orrin Judd at September 10, 2004 2:34 PM
Canada has 18 fighter-bombers? Why, in case there's an airshow in Paris and Beijing?
Posted by: David Cohen at September 10, 2004 3:00 PMDavid:
Or San Francisco. Apparently the Blue Angels have better things to do (a gig in Hawaii) than perform at Fleet Week here in October (can't say I blame them). Fleet Week has never been the same since the Navy closed all of its bases here. Purely a coincidence, undoubtedly, that the United States Navy would abandon one of the greatest natural harbors in the world. No connection, certainly, to its treatment at the hands of Ron Dellums (D-Berkeley), fleetingly chairman of the House Armed Services Committee (can't say I blame them, if other than a coincidence). So I read today that a Canadian stunt fighter-jet team will substitute. I'm sure they'll do fine, so long as they don't try to slip under the Golden Gate Bridge or fly (during practice) through the downtown SF highrises.
Posted by: Fred Jacobsen (San Fran) at September 11, 2004 5:50 AMWith all due respect, Fred, the only reason I would want to see American military forces in and around San Francisco is to bring it back under American control. If Kim Jong-Il threw a nuke on SanFran, I'd send him a bouquet of flowers.
Posted by: Bart at September 11, 2004 6:59 AMI understand that the Canadian armed forces will be conducting joint exercises with Spain, code named "Operation Glorious Withdrawal 2004".
Posted by: Robert Duquette at September 12, 2004 2:00 AM