September 11, 2004

GET OVER IT? IT'S WHO WE ARE:

Can't We Get Over the Millenarian Impulses in Our Traditions? (Herbert Bix, Sept. 2004, Japan Focus):

In the second year of the U.S. occupation of Iraq many people in the U.S. still cling to a political tradition that confuses actually existing American society "with the ideal society that would fulfill human destiny."1 They tend to think of the United States not as the polyarchy and global empire that it is, but as the incarnation of "freedom and democracy," or at least the closest approximation to the democratic ideal that exists. Whatever their assessment of current U.S. foreign policy, they regard their country as the Promised Land, the embodiment of Western virtue, the deliverer of freedom to oppressed peoples.

Many see it, too, as the only national state that wages perpetual war for the global good. From starting a war to setting aside the prohibitions of international law and morality, the U.S. is entitled to do, beyond its borders, what it wants when it wants, provided the action can be justified in utilitarian terms of saving American lives and the U.S. Congress goes along with it.

Whether we call this absolute veneration of "America" national essentialism or millennialism, whether we see it as the outlook of a superpower or the prerogative of a self-designated Chosen People, at its root lies "the belief that [American] history, under divine guidance, will bring about the triumph of Christian principles" and eventually the emergence of "a holy utopia."3 Such faith in the unique moral destiny of the United States may be held independently of Christian beliefs. Its historical origins, however, trace back to colonial New England, and beyond that to the Bible; and it is omnipresent in every part of the country, even though its strongest regional base presently lies in the South and West. [...]

If Hiroshima and Nagasaki, My Lai and Abu Ghraib, did not dent, let alone shatter, the conquering Chosen People ideology, what chance is there that U.S. failure in Iraq will? As long as U.S. political and economic institutions elude thoroughgoing reform, and American officials at the highest level enjoy total immunity for their crimes, the historic cycle will recur.


Rarely does the Left argue with such clarity that they consider America--its people, its faiths, its traditions, and its history--to be the real enemy.

Posted by Orrin Judd at September 11, 2004 2:54 PM
Comments

But don't say they're not patriotic! Why, hating your country is the most patriotic thing a person can do! I don't understand it myself, but I'm a member of the Stupid Party so it's understandable that all this liberal nuance flies right over my head.

Posted by: Governor Breck at September 11, 2004 3:22 PM

"...the only national state that wages perpetual war for the global good. "

Geesh, you'd think that someone, somewhere would have figured out America by now. Heck, it's only been 200 years.
All the rest of the world needs to do, to get us to stay within our borders, is just LEAVE US THE HECK ALONE. We' are more than willing to let every peoples in the world to go their own way, but no--they insist on attacking us. And then whine when we whack them back tenfold.

Posted by: ray at September 11, 2004 8:33 PM

The essential problem seems to be that the USA goes to war whenever its government wants to. And this is different from other nations because …?

He's also got a problem with cycles. In case he didn't notice it, every series of wars cleans up another part of the globe for the USA. It's not precisely cyclic.

Posted by: Annoying Old Guy at September 11, 2004 11:49 PM

He apparently thinks Hiroshima and Nagasaki were as trivial as Abu Ghraib. How odd.

Posted by: carter at September 12, 2004 1:09 AM
« THE BOY WHO CRIED LAMB: | Main | »