September 10, 2004

DOCU-DRAMA:

What the Bush Guard Papers Really Say: The CBS story just doesn’t add up. (Byron York, 9/10/04, National Review)

On Wednesday, CBS News released four previously undisclosed documents which it said were written by Killian, who died in 1984. One of them, dated August 18, 1973, refers to Killian's reluctance to evaluate Bush's performance. Suggesting that top Texas Air National Guard officers were putting pressure on him to "sugar coat" Bush's performance rating, Killian wrote, "Bush wasn't here during rating period and I don't have any feedback from 187th in Alabama. I will not rate."

But as the first document suggests, months before, Killian — and Harris — had quite decisively declined to rate Bush's performance. If Killian was under pressure to "sugar coat" Bush's performance, he had certainly not yielded to it. Nor had anyone else "sugar coated" the Bush evaluation.

A year before the "Not Observed" rating, according to the CBS documents, Killian was again concerned about the possibility of special treatment for Bush. A document attributed to Killian, dated May 4, 1972, orders Bush to report for a physical examination. Then another document, dated May 19, 1972, says Killian had a phone conversation with Bush about the young lieutenant's desire to transfer to an Air National Guard unit in Alabama. Bush, according to the document, said he might not have time to take his physical exam. "I advised him of our investment in him and his commitment," the document says, purportedly in Killian's words. "I also told him I had to have written acceptance before he would be transferred, but think he's also talking to someone upstairs."

But according to the documents released by the White House, just seven days later, on May 26, 1972, Killian signed on to a glowing report of Bush's performance. "Lt. Bush is an exceptional fighter interceptor pilot and officer," the report, written by Harris, said. "He eagerly participates in scheduled unit activities." The evaluation even took approving note of the fact that, "Lt. Bush is very active in civic affairs in the community and manifests a deep interest in the operation of our government. He has recently accepted the position as campaign manager for a candidate for United States Senate." Below Harris's signature, there was the statement, "I concur with the comments and ratings of the reporting official," signed by Killian.


One of the great mysteries here is why Democrats and the press thought these documents were so significant even if real.

Posted by Orrin Judd at September 10, 2004 1:09 PM
Comments

Every day spent on Vietnam is a bad day for John Kerry.

Posted by: David Cohen at September 10, 2004 1:18 PM

Why did the Arizona Cardnials think that long pass into four defenders on the last play of the last game of the season last year was going to work and knock the Minnesota Vikings out of the playoffs? The odds were against it working, but it did, which is what the Democrats are praying for with the National Guard story (and of course thanks to the Cardnials' play receiver Nathan Poole was hailed as a hero and invited to John Kerry's favorite football stadium, Lambert Field by the Green Bay Packers for getting them into the playoffs).

Posted by: John at September 10, 2004 1:27 PM

David:

Gotta think the days spent on Nixon's dirty tricks will be even worse. Here's your Meet the Press question: Senator, who's your G. Gordon Liddy?

Posted by: oj at September 10, 2004 1:30 PM

Lambeau Field.

Posted by: Bartman at September 10, 2004 1:30 PM

He knew that -- click the link

Posted by: joe shropshire at September 10, 2004 1:37 PM

oj:

Speaking of Nixon, didn't he have a hisstory of memos and typewriter analysis? Will Kerry turn into a pumpkin at midnight?

Posted by: Fred Jacobsen (San Fran) at September 10, 2004 1:39 PM

Alger Hiss: "I'll never understand how Whittaker Chambers could have broken into my house and typed those documents on my typewriter." We've already seen the equivalent in this case ("A Karl Rove plant!"). How long before it becomes, as with Hiss, the Official Version?

Posted by: Bob Hawkins at September 10, 2004 2:08 PM

"One of the great mysteries here is why Democrats and the press thought these documents were so significant even if real."

For the same reason a drowning man would grasp at a straw.

Posted by: Jeff Guinn at September 10, 2004 2:10 PM

That's a whole freakin' omelette on your face, CBS.

Posted by: Matt Murphy at September 10, 2004 2:38 PM

Even if all the allegations about Bush's TANG service are true, (and I'm not conceding that), none of it adds up to a compelling reason to vote for John F'ing Kerry.

But apparently that's good enough for a significant portion of the American left.

Posted by: Roy Jacobsen at September 10, 2004 2:41 PM

Current state of play:

Rather: "I know this story is the truth."

McAuliffe: Rove is behind it...

Posted by: curt at September 10, 2004 3:01 PM

More than an omelette, it's an ostrich egg!

And Dan Rather must be running for something again (only this time, the joke is on him).

Of course, Dan could be receiving information on a different frequency. And perhaps he'll walk off the set instead of answering questions about this debacle.

Posted by: jim hamlen at September 10, 2004 3:19 PM

If McAuliffe turns out to be behind it, it will certainly fuel the conspiracy theorists vis a vis Bill & Hill. Have to save that 2008 spot.

Posted by: Jeff at September 10, 2004 3:19 PM

TANG was invented by NASA, which augered that billion dollar experiment into the desert yesterday

Posted by: Robert Schwartz at September 10, 2004 4:31 PM
« THE NOTABLE PRESENCE OF THE COLONIES: | Main | ...AND LOWER...: »