September 28, 2004

DO YOU, JOHN KERRY, ACCEPT THIS REGIME? (via Fred Jacobsen):

SENATE ESTABLISHING A PROGRAM SUPPORT A TRANSITION TO DEMOCRACY IN IRAQ (Congressional Record, October 7, 1998)

Mr. McCAIN: I ask unanimous consent that the Senate now proceed to the consideration of H.R. 4655, which is at the desk.

The PRESIDING OFFICER: The clerk will report. The assistant legislative clerk read as follows:

A bill (H.R. 4665) to establish a program to support a transition to democracy in Iraq.

The PRESIDING OFFICER: Is there objection to the immediate consideration of the bill, There being no objection, the Senate proceeded to consider the bill. [...]

Mr. KERREY: Mr. President, I rise to urge the passage of HR. 4655, the Iraq Liberation Act. Thanks to strong leadership in both Houses of Congress and thanks to the commitment of the Administration toward the goals we all share--for Iraq and the region, this legislation is moving quickly. This is the point to state what this legislation is not, and what it is, from my understanding, and why I support it so strongly,

First, this bill is not, in my view, an instrument to direct U.S. funds and supplies to any particular Iraqi revolutionary movement. There are Iraqi movements now in existence which could qualify for designation in accordance with this bill. Other Iraqis not now associated with each other could also band together and qualify for designation. It is for Iraqis, not Americans to organize themselves to put Saddam Hussein out of power, just as it will be for Iraqis to choose their leaders in a democratic Iraq. This bill will help the Administration encourage and
support Iraqis to make their revolution.

Second, this bill is not a device to involve the U.S. military in operations in or near Iraq. The Iraqi revolution is for Iraqis, not Americans, to make. The bill provides the Administration a portent new tool to help Iraqis toward this goal, and at the same time advance America's interest in a peaceful and secure Middle East.

This bill, when passed and signed into law, is a clear commitment to a U.S. policy replacing the Saddam Hussein regime and replacing it with a transition to democracy. This bill is a statement that America refuses to coexist with a regime which has used chemical weapons on its own citizens and on neighboring countries, which has invaded its neighbors twice without provocation, which has still not accounted for its atrocities committed in Kuwait, which has fired ballistic missiles into the cities of three of its neighbors, which is attempting to develop
nuclear and biological weapons, and which has brutalized and terrorized its own citizens for thirty years. I don't see how any democratic country could accept the existence of such a regime, but this bill says America will not.
I will be an even prouder American when the refusal, and commitment to materially help the Iraqi resistance, are U.S. policy.


Speech at New York University (John Kerry, 9/20/04)
Saddam Hussein was a brutal dictator who deserves his own special place in hell. But that was not, in itself, a reason to go to war. The satisfaction we take in his downfall does not hide this fact: we have traded a dictator for a chaos that has left America less secure.

They nominated the wrong Kerr[e]y.

Posted by Orrin Judd at September 28, 2004 1:27 PM
Comments

The Kerry Doctrine -- Only pro-choice chief executives can declare war ... or maybe war can't be waged while taxes are being cut ... or maybe brutal dictators can only be removed from power by persons with law degrees ... or something like that. I'm sure he'll clarify everything Thursday night.

Posted by: John at September 29, 2004 12:10 AM

...Why is it spelled "Kerrey"? Dumb question, maybe, but are we sure this is the right "Kerry"?

Posted by: Just John at September 29, 2004 2:38 AM

The speaker appears to be former US Senator Bob Kerrey of Nebraska, who served from 1989-2001, rather than Mr. Botox.
Former Senator Kerrey's Congressional bioguide indicates that, although born in 1943, he has a son born in 2001. Maybe he could give Mr. Botox some useful personal advice too.

Posted by: Steve at September 29, 2004 3:39 AM

Here's an example: Bert and Harry hated each other. After Bert's automobile accident, Harry said to him, "I found it regrettable, what happened to you last week." Bert failed to realize that Harry meant, "It's regrettable that you survived the accident."

Similarly, the words, "...we have traded a dictator for a chaos that has left America less secure," alludes to the fact that the liberal agenda might possibly gain headway.

Posted by: at September 29, 2004 8:10 AM
« DID YOU KNOW HE SERVED IN VIETNAM? | Main | I AM SHOCKED...SHOCKED »