September 19, 2004
ANOTHER ISM TO BURY (via Tom Corcoran):
A rare look at secretive Brotherhood in America: A group aiming to create Islamic states worldwide has established roots here, in large part under the guidance of Egypt-born Ahmed Elkadi (Noreen S. Ahmed-Ullah, Sam Roe and Laurie Cohen, September 19, 2004, Chicago Tribune)
Over the last 40 years, small groups of devout Muslim men have gathered in homes in U.S. cities to pray, memorize the Koran and discuss events of the day.But they also addressed their ultimate goal, one so controversial that it is a key reason they have operated in secrecy: to create Muslim states overseas and, they hope, someday in America as well.
These men are part of an underground U.S. chapter of the international Muslim Brotherhood, the world's most influential Islamic fundamentalist group and an organization with a violent past in the Middle East. But fearing persecution, they rarely identify themselves as Brotherhood members and have operated largely behind the scenes, unbeknown even to many Muslims.
Still, the U.S. Brotherhood has had a significant and ongoing impact on Islam in America, helping establish mosques, Islamic schools, summer youth camps and prominent Muslim organizations. It is a major factor, Islamic scholars say, in why many Muslim institutions in the nation have become more conservative in recent decades.
Leading the U.S. Brotherhood during much of this period was Ahmed Elkadi, an Egyptian-born surgeon and a former personal physician to Saudi Arabia's King Faisal. He headed the group from 1984 to 1994 but abruptly lost his leadership position. Now he is discussing his life and the U.S. Brotherhood for the first time.
His story, combined with details from documents and interviews, offers an unprecedented look at the Brotherhood in America: how the group recruited members, how it cloaked itself in secrecy and how it alienated many moderate Muslims. [...]
Brotherhood members emphasize that they follow the laws of the nations in which they operate. They stress that they do not believe in overthrowing the U.S. government, but rather that they want as many people as possible to convert to Islam so that one day--perhaps generations from now--a majority of Americans will support a society governed by Islamic law. Muslims make up less than 3 percent of the U.S. population, but estimates of their number vary widely from 2 million to 7 million.
Federal authorities say they have scrutinized the U.S. Brotherhood for years. Agents currently are investigating whether people with ties to the group have raised and laundered money to finance terrorism abroad. No terrorism-related charges have been filed. [...]
Elkadi had a strategy to make America more Islamic that reflected a long-standing Brotherhood belief: First you change the person, then the family, then the community, then the nation.
By 1990, U.S. Brotherhood members had made headway on that plan by helping establish many mosques and Islamic organizations. Some of those efforts were backed financially by the ultraconservative Saudi Arabian government, which shared some of the Brotherhood's fundamentalist goals.
Elkadi himself helped create several noted Islamic organizations, including the Muslim Youth of North America, which attempted to draw thousands of high school students to Islam by sponsoring soccer teams, providing scholarships and offering a line of clothing. He served as president of the North American Islamic Trust, a group that helped build and preserve mosques.
Some of those organizations eventually would distance themselves from the Brotherhood. The Islamic Society of North America, the umbrella group for the Muslim Youth of North America and the Muslim Students Association, says Brotherhood members helped form those groups but that their overall influence has been limited.
Groups that the Brotherhood helped form printed Islamic books, many of which were distributed at mosques and on college campuses. They included Sayyid Qutb's "In the Shade of the Koran" and "Milestones," which urge jihad, martyrdom and the creation of Islamic states. Scholars came to view his writings as manifestos for Islamic militants.
"These books had questionable paradigms, especially a dichotomous division between `us' and `them,'" says Umar Faruq Abdallah, a noted Islamic scholar who heads a Muslim educational group in suburban Chicago. "It was very harmful. It helped to create a countercultural attitude in our community."
Inamul Haq, professor of religion at Benedictine University in Lisle, Ill., says the U.S. Brotherhood pushed Islam in a conservative direction. "They were in a position to define American Islam. Since they were well-connected in the Middle East, they were able to bring money to build various institutions."
Without the Brotherhood, he says, "We would have seen a more American Islamic culture rather than a foreign community living in the United States."
Like Communism before it, there's no reason to tolerate a foreign-funded attempt to subvert the constitutional order. But, again like Communism, there's even less reason to believe Islamicism will succeed here. These guys great-grandchildren are more likely to be Mormon than Muslim. Posted by Orrin Judd at September 19, 2004 5:20 PM
I concur that this mumbo-jumbo would never fly here, but is still bears watching. Islamicism, I suggest, is just one more manifestation of the same reactionary Hesperophobia that drove and drives Communism, Boxerism, Nazism, Nipism, and neo-paganism.
Of some concern is the fad, in certain circles, of naming one's children "Jamaal" or some such made-up moniker. There is a lot of un-American, racist nonsense being peddled by the multicultural crowd these days.
We are not so weak, so suicidal, so like a European, that we would go under before we responded to necessity with force. You are correct, fortunately, in that it will never come to that.
Posted by: Lou Gots at September 19, 2004 5:46 PMI rather suspect that not all European nations will allow themselves to become majority Muslim without bloodshed.
Muslim Brotherhood members' great-grandchildren are also more likely to vacation on the Moon, than be Muslim.
Posted by: Michael Herdegen at September 19, 2004 6:36 PMConsidering that Islam mandates the murder of apostates, I unfortunately think it rather likely that their great grand childern will be raving Islamists.
Posted by: AML at September 20, 2004 8:11 AM"Subvert the constitutional order"? Huh?
There's nothing in the constitution that prevents people from--peacefully--trying to change things. Americans have the right to change the constitution however they see fit, as long as they act legally. That means that we can, if we choose, do stupid things, like Prohibition. Or smart things, like most of the other amendments. We can do away with separation of church and state (which a surprisingly large number support, as long as its their own religion that comes out on top.
As long as this group keeps its nose clean in terms of its relationship with terrorist groups, there's nothing illegal about what they're trying to do. Misguided? Certainly, but that's not reason to shut them down.
BTW, "Jamaal" isn't "made up". It's Arabic for "Handsome" or "pretty". Sort of like that Bubba name "Beau", "Belle", or "Linda".
Posted by: John at September 20, 2004 10:44 AMJohn:
It would obviously be absurd to believe that the constitution protects those who would do away with it. People can say whatever they want, but we can persecute them for it.
Posted by: oj at September 20, 2004 10:53 AM"Preservse, protect and defend the constitution.." is the oath of office for elected federal officials. The "seperation of church and state" is lodged in what part of that document? "There shall be no religious test..", is an interesting axample since the basis for rights transcends man or the state as per the declaration. In other words the justification for the seperation from England was her nullification of the natural law which defined the relationship between Amaricans and their government. There was a theistic test, derived from a Christian understanding rather than a Catholic, Episcopal, Methodist or Baptist test.
Muslims are free to practice their religion wthin this nation. Those rights are nullified once they step outside the bounds of civilized, constitutionally protected behavior.
Posted by: Tom C, Stamford,Ct. at September 20, 2004 12:00 PMAML:
Not in America.
Perhaps in the Middle East, although we shall see...
