August 24, 2004
YOU CAN’T GO HOME AGAIN
Here's the Olympian point: We ogle the flesh (Margaret Wente, Globe and Mail, August 24th, 2004)
The Olympics have become like Field Day in Grade 3. There are so many medals on offer that, eventually, every country's bound to get one, so long as it shows up. No nation is allowed to go home empty-handed, not even a scrawny little one like us. Besides, artistic gymnastics is nothing to sneeze at. It is definitely higher on the athletic status ladder than synchronized swimming, another event that has frequently stood between us and global shame. I don't know why we're so good at it. Perhaps synchronized swimming is simply too silly for anybody else to bother with.[...]Are all sports equally worthy? The ancient Greeks didn't think so. They didn't go in for synchro-anything. Unlike Canadians, who love playing nicely together, they were strictly individual competitors. They did not believe in team sports, artistry or nose plugs. They believed in running, jumping, wrestling and hurling heavy objects through the air. Unlike synchronized swimmers, they approved of gouging and pummelling their opponents to death. This made determining the victor a whole lot easier than it is today. You never had to worry about scoring 9.787. You knew you'd won when you'd killed the other guy.
Not everybody minds that the pure spirit of the Olympics has been diluted by the addition of women and all kinds of silly pseudo-sports. My husband, for example, rather likes it. He is an avid student of women's beach volleyball, which he thinks is a noble addition to the Games. He also loves the Amazons who run around the track. He adores the female wrestlers, and wonders what it would be like if Tonya Verbeek got him in a headlock. Speaking for myself, I don't know beans about the men's backstroke or the fly, but I appreciate the broad shoulders and narrow hips of the swimmers and the gymnasts in their itty-bitty skin-tight suits. My husband swears that half of them are gay, but I think he's just being mean.
After these Games, they will debate adding sports like skateboarding, squash and rugby to the Olympics. Frighteningly unattractive women now wrestle and weightlift while announcers never dare say what is on everyone’s mind. Disabled athletes are demanding full participation with that defiant sense of entitlement that characterizes modern victimhood (Can seniors be far behind?). Judging is suspect in most sports where “presentation” is scored. It now takes a decade for the host to prepare because the entire city must be rebuilt and the Games can only be financed by forcing us to watch two minutes of cutesy, repetitive commercials for every one of competition. Drug cheating remains endemic and threats to suspend countries or entire sports are never carried out. Yet, like Ozymandias’ kingdom, the movement is incapable of even the most minor retrenchment and we watch the whole silly, boring extravaganza with artificially induced excitement, knowing full well we are witnessing a modern Roman circus destined to collapse.
It is enough to make a poor boy yearn for a good soccer match.
Posted by Peter Burnet at August 24, 2004 8:34 AMI'd watch a soccer match if it included gouging and pummeling.
Posted by: twn at August 24, 2004 8:47 AMSorry Peter, but I don't get the reference to Ozymandias' kingdom. I know Shelley's poem, but there's nothing in the poem to indicate if his kingdom fell in a day or retrenched bit by bit over centuries. Please elucidate.
By the way, I agree with your central thesis that the current Olympics are a silly waste of time and money. Probably the only way they can survive is by holding future Olympics in Greece only, so that new facilities don't have to be built every 4 years. This would at least keep costs under control.
Posted by: David Rothman at August 24, 2004 8:52 AMDavid:
Actually, I wasn't thinking of the poem. Ancient Sanskrit documents discovered in northern India prove that Ozymandias was counselled repeatedly by his advisors to cut back on the splendour, but he stubbornly refused and....
Ok, Ok. Sheesh! Can't a guy get away with a little poetic license once and a while? Not on this site I guess. :-)
Posted by: Peter B at August 24, 2004 8:59 AM"I'd watch a soccer match if it included gouging and pummeling."
It does, it does. It's in the stands though.
The Olympics as we knew them are just about at an end. Pretty soon gene-doping and really far-out pharmaceuticals will cause most current records to seem quaint.
Posted by: Bruce Cleaver at August 24, 2004 9:17 AMI think that attendance trends at the current games cause some retrenchment.
Posted by: Robert Schwartz at August 24, 2004 10:46 AM"we are witnessing a modern Roman circus"
Hardly. Roman circuses must have been immensely entertaining events, part WWF, part ultimate fighting, part NASCAR. What could be better.
Posted by: H.D. Miller at August 24, 2004 1:12 PMHDM:
Indeed. Indoor Naval battles! Lions vs bears! Women vs Dwarves!
And people believe in 'progress'.
Posted by: mike earl at August 24, 2004 2:33 PMPeter:
1976: Montreal. Bankrupt.
1980: Moscow. Retrenchment delayed by totalitarian Communist regime printing money to host.
1984: Los Angeles. Retrenchment occurs. Received bid because no other city wanted it (see Montreal bankruptcy). IOC has to make major facilities (allowing the use of existing venues) and licensing (LA gets the money) concessions.
2004: Athens. Will go bankrupt (e.g. $1.5 billion on security alone; 4% of GDP spent on Games).
2008: Beijing. Retrenchment delayed by totalitarian Communist regime printing money to host.
2012: See a pattern here?
Posted by: Fred Jacobsen (San Fran) at August 24, 2004 2:49 PM