August 16, 2004

IT'S NOT FAIR--THEY HAVE THE ANTI-ZIONIST WHACKJOBS & WE JUST HAVE RESPECTED COLD WARRIORS (via Kevin Whited):

Groups will rebut Bush critics (David R. Sands, 8/15/04, THE WASHINGTON TIMES)

Two new groups, supported by retired senior military commanders and three former secretaries of state, will issue a sharp rebuttal to a manifesto by a group of retired U.S. diplomats criticizing President Bush.

The groups will argue this week that the anti-Bush statement gives a false impression that the U.S. foreign-policy establishment opposes Mr. Bush's policies en masse. They also worry that the attack undermines the Foreign Service's claim of nonpartisanship.

"Can you really argue that we in the Foreign Service can serve both red America and blue America impartially if the elders in our own tribe are turning themselves into political warriors?" asked Thomas Boyatt, who served for 25 years in the diplomatic corps and was President Reagan's ambassador to Colombia, referring to the colors used to identify Democratic- and Republican-leaning states.

"People have a constitutional right to express their opinions, but these kinds of overt political statements go against 75 years of tradition for retired senior diplomats," said Mr. Boyatt, speaking for the newly formed Diplomats for a Nonpartisan Foreign Service.

Among those expected to endorse his group's call for a nonpartisan diplomatic corps at a press conference tomorrow are former Secretaries of State Henry Kissinger, George P. Shultz and Lawrence Eagleburger, as well as former Defense Secretary Frank C. Carlucci.


Posted by Orrin Judd at August 16, 2004 12:22 PM
Comments

I can certainly vouch that State has a problem with partisanship.

While I've no problem whatsoever with retired officers getting into partisan politics--we're prevented by the Hatch Act from doing so while working--it doesn't belong in the job.

The job requires non-partisanship. For one reason, career last longer than maybe seven or eight administrations.

But people definitely exert their preferences, usually through non-action than overt action. One of the reasons I got fed up.

Posted by: John at August 16, 2004 5:48 PM

While SS reform is front-burner for 41's second term, cleaning up the mess in the State Department (policy and execution) must be attended to as well. If only Jesse Helms were a vigorous 65.....

Posted by: jim hamlen at August 16, 2004 10:38 PM

jim:

Government bureaucracies always end up serving those they deal with not those on whose behalf they deal.

Posted by: oj at August 16, 2004 10:50 PM
« THE FLAT TAX COMPROMISE: | Main | PUBLIC SKOOL MATH: »