August 25, 2004

IT'S A START:

Deadline looms in Sudan crisis: Khartoum agrees to allow more African Union troops and monitors in Darfur. (Danna Harman, 8/26/04, CS Monitor)

Four days from a United Nations deadline to disarm and punish those responsible for killing an estimated 30,000 people during the 18-month crisis in western Sudan, two key questions remain: Has the Sudanese government made sufficient progress to stave off possible UN sanctions? Probably. And, critically, does the UN have the will to follow through with its threats? Probably not.

"Khartoum remains adept at saying and doing just enough to avoid a robust international response; but the fact is they have not satisfactorily fulfilled their obligations within the time period established by the [July 30 UN] resolution," charges John Prendergast, an Africa expert at the International Crisis Group (ICG), based in Washington. "What we need now is direct, concerted pressure - otherwise, the Security Council risks being part of a long cycle of threats that have rarely been followed up meaningfully." [...]

The main area of progress is on the humanitarian front. Back in June, aid groups were waiting months to get visas and travel permits, and supplies were getting blocked by customs. But this month at least six new nongovernmental organizations were given permits to operate in the region, and existing ones added staff and programs. Wednesday, the International Committee of the Red Cross announced plans to launch a major airlift to the region. It said it intends to make six trips into the region, carrying equipment and medical supplies, by Sept. 5.

"Pressure on the government has worked," says Adam Koons, director of Save the Children-USA in Sudan. "As horrible as the situation is, and much effort is still needed, we have averted enormous loss of life."

Posted by Orrin Judd at August 25, 2004 5:49 PM
Comments

It's amazing just how right Samuel Huntington was in the Clash of Civilizations when he said that only states within a civilization would have the approval to intervene in dsputes taking place within it.

That would also explain why the US had almost no flak going into Bosnia/Kosovo, but did when we invaded Iraq.

Posted by: Chris Durnell at August 26, 2004 11:58 AM

Chris:

Really? I recall them not being able to get approval for Kosovo either.

Posted by: oj at August 26, 2004 12:11 PM

Thank god the do-gooders are safe. I was so worried about that

Posted by: Harry Eagar at August 27, 2004 9:38 PM
« CIRCUS MAXIMUS: | Main | LARGE "D" DEMOCRATS: »