August 5, 2004
HOW SWEET IT IS:
Ruling jolts EU sugar producers (Stefania Bianchi, 8/06/04, Asia Times)
Civil-society groups have hailed as a triumph for developing countries a World Trade Organization (WTO) ruling on Wednesday that the European Union is illegally dumping millions of tonnes of subsidized sugar on world markets. But if the ruling is accepted, it could force the EU to slash its sugar subsidies abruptly. And for big sugar producers such as France, Germany and Poland, that would create real problems for both farmers and politicians.In a case brought by Brazil, Thailand and Australia against the EU, the WTO's dispute-settlement body, the world's trade court, ruled that EU subsidies help farmers cover their fixed costs and enable them to produce additional amounts of sugar at low additional cost, which they then sell on international markets.
The ruling also found that the EU exports up to 5 million tonnes of sugar each year despite making a commitment under the Uruguay Round of trade talks to reduce its subsidized exports to just over 1 million tonnes a year.
Interest groups say government subsidies like these give European farmers an unfair advantage in global export markets. According to the international relief organization Oxfam, the EU reduces world sugar market prices by 23%. In 2002 this led to foreign-exchange losses of about US$494 million for Brazil, $151 million for Thailand, and $60 million each for South Africa and India.
After all their squealing about steel, let's see how much the Euros like free trade. Posted by Orrin Judd at August 5, 2004 12:32 PM
Mr. Judd;
This is why we should stay in the WTO. While it can hurt us now and then, it will hurt our enemies far more frequently. And frankly, the short term hurts will be long term gains for us, but probably not for Old Europe.
Posted by: Annoying Old Guy at August 5, 2004 3:36 PMGet out and unilaterally do away with all trade supports and limits. Sovereignty is more important than trade.
Posted by: oj at August 5, 2004 3:57 PMThis should make Harry Eagar happy - He's protective of the Hawai'ian sugar industry.
Posted by: Michael Herdegen at August 5, 2004 5:21 PMMr. Judd;
Who's being the unrealistic utopian now?
Posted by: Annoying Old Guy at August 5, 2004 5:32 PMThere isn't much Hawaiian sugar industry left. The pro-protectionist wing failed.
The remaining producers contend, I believe correctly, that they can produce sugar cheaper than anybody else and would welcome a true free market.
They understand they will never get it.
The major producer, unlike the Louisiana and Florida growers, does not participate in the loan support program. Never has.
Posted by: Harry Eagar at August 6, 2004 2:40 PMHI sugar is subsidized though:
http://www.ewg.org/farm/progdetail.php?fips=15000&progcode=sugar
Posted by: oj at August 6, 2004 5:12 PMIt's sold in a partially protected market. The price received is, however, probably less than the cost of production of any foreign producer.
Posted by: Harry Eagar at August 8, 2004 3:43 PM