August 30, 2004
BUT ENOUGH FROM THE SWIFT BOAT VETS, LET'S HEAR FROM THE ANTI-WAR VETS:
I watched Kerry throw his war decorations (Thomas Oliphant, April 27, 2004, Boston Globe)
ON THE WAY to the fence where he threw some of his military decorations 33 years ago, I was 4 or 5 feet behind John Kerry.As he neared the spot from which members of Vietnam Veterans Against the War were parting with a few of the trappings of their difficult past to help them face their future more squarely, I watched Kerry reach with his right hand into the breast pocket of his fatigue shirt. The hand emerged with several of the ribbons that most of the vets had been wearing that unique week of protest, much as they are worn on a uniform blouse.
There couldn't have been all that many decorations in his hand -- six or seven -- because he made a closed fist around his collection with ease as he waited his turn. I recall him getting stopped by one or two wounded vets in wheelchairs, clearly worried that they wouldn't be able to get their stuff over the looming fence, who gave him a few more decorations. Kerry says he doesn't remember this.
It is true that Kerry was one of the veterans group's "leaders," but in this eclectic, aggressively individualistic collection of people who had been through a pointless war, there were no privileges of rank. Kerry was in the middle of a line of perhaps 1,000 guys -- only a third or even less of the total who had assembled on the Washington Mall that astonishing week.
At the spot where the men were symbolically letting go of their participation in the war, the authorities had erected a wood and wire fence that prevented them from getting close to the front of the US Capitol, and Kerry paused for several seconds. We had been talking for days -- about the war, politics, the veterans' demonstration -- but I could tell Kerry was upset to the point of anguish, and I decided to leave him be; his head was down as he approached the fence quietly.
In a voice I doubt I would have heard had I not been so close to him, Kerry said, as I recall vividly, "There is no violent reason for this; I'm doing this for peace and justice and to try to help this country wake up once and for all."
With that, he didn't really throw his handful toward the statue of John Marshall, America's first chief justice.
The Kerry I Know: So he's not Mr. Charisma. But he has courage, judgment, and intellect. Imagine that! (Thomas Oliphant, 08.01.04, American Prospect)
What Kerry did in the spring of 1971 still amazes me. The power and eloquence of his statement to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee gets most of the attention because the film survives, but what amazed me more was the quiet leadership he and a few pals showed in guiding perhaps 2,000 veterans -- many severely wounded, angry, bitter, and passionate -- for a week that stunned the country with its nonviolent effectiveness.At the time, Kerry told me that he assumed his actions had precluded a political career, a sentiment experience had taught me to share.
They were right, these actions do preclude a national political career. Posted by Orrin Judd at August 30, 2004 9:25 AM
One imagines Oliphant climbing on the stage at the debates and chiding the audience for laughing at his hero, the way Franz Liebken did in "The Producers."
Posted by: John at August 30, 2004 10:01 AMI remember, in Feb. or March of 1951 a shoe box being passed around on a hillside in Korea that was almost full of Purple Heart medals to be sent to Truman for calling the war a "police action." I hadn't gotten one yet so couldn't participate at the time.
I did better; I voted for Eisenhower.
Posted by: genecis at August 30, 2004 11:21 AMI have no idea if this is true, but ...
A former Marine noncom here, a Vietnam veteran, is going to his unit's reunion this weekend. He tells me that he's heard, from buddies he's been talking to about the reunion, that Kerry was the first naval officer ever to take advantage of the three ph's and out rule. As I say, I have no idea if that's true.
Posted by: David Cohen at August 30, 2004 11:50 AM>They were right, these actions do preclude a
>national political career.
Unless all the Loyal Inner Party Cadres (especially in the media) stay Loyal to The Party Line.
war is peace
freedom is slavery
ignorance is strength
oceania has always been at peace with eurasia
the chocolate ration of twenty grams has been increased to ten grams
2 + 2 = 5
bush is goldstein
David, that's very interesting if true. I did read that the Swift Vets still had information about Kerry that they hadn't revealed yet, and that it would be devastating. I wonder if that could be it?
Posted by: PapayaSF at August 30, 2004 2:15 PMOliphant stated that Kerry and the other veterans "were symbolically letting go of their particpation in the war." That's what I thought too at the time. Why hasn't Kerry honored this intention? He renounced the honors that went with his participation in a war that he thought was unjustified; however, he has been allowed by the media to unrenounce his actions to the extent that he can brag about his medals.
Posted by: George at August 30, 2004 2:57 PMMr. Oliphant has stated that Sen. Kerry and other veterans who discarded their medals were men who "were symbolically letting go of their participation in the war." Why have Mr. Oliphant and other members of the media not criticized Sen. Kerry for having betrayed this symbolic disavowal of any participation in the war by having tried so hard to take credit for such participation?
Posted by: George at August 30, 2004 6:38 PM