July 22, 2004
SMEAR THE FAUX-QUEER (via Jeff Guinn):
The Metrosexual Superpower: The stylish European Union struts past the bumbling United States on the catwalk of global diplomacy. (Parag Khanna, July/August 2004, Foreign Policy)
According to Michael Flocker's 2003 bestseller, The Metrosexual Guide to Style: A Handbook for the Modern Man, the trendsetting male icons of the 21st century must combine the coercive strengths of Mars and the seductive wiles of Venus. Put simply, metrosexual men are muscular but suave, confident yet image-conscious, assertive yet clearly in touch with their feminine sides. Just consider British soccer star David Beckham. He is married to former Spice Girl Victoria “Posh” Adams, but his combination of athleticism and cross-dressing make him a sex symbol to both women and men worldwide, not to mention the inspiration for the 2002 hit movie Bend It Like Beckham. Substance, Beckham shows, is nothing without style.Geopolitics is much the same. American neoconservatives such as Robert Kagan look down upon feminine, Venus-like Europeans, gibing their narcissistic obsession with building a postmodern, bureaucratic paradise. The United States, by contrast, supposedly carries the mantle of masculine Mars, boldly imposing freedom in the world's nastiest neighborhoods. But by cleverly deploying both its hard power and its sensitive side, the European Union (EU) has become more effective—and more attractive—than the United States on the catwalk of diplomatic clout. Meet the real New Europe: the world's first metrosexual superpower.
The silliness of this argument is almost too easily demonstrated: the metroxuals wanted Saddam in power; the heterosexuals didn't. He's not. Posted by Orrin Judd at July 22, 2004 12:32 PM
Reminds me of the flashy swordsman gunned down by Indiana Jones in Raiders - who would you rather be: the showy guy with the sword or Indy?
Posted by: Governor Breck at July 22, 2004 12:56 PMDavid, not Goliath.
Posted by: oj at July 22, 2004 1:04 PMThe myth of European stability is amazing in its
persistence.
"But by cleverly deploying both its hard power and its sensitive side, the European Union (EU) has become more effective."
I'm confused -- what hard power does the EU have, let alone used?
If you don't listen to us America will intervene.
Posted by: oj at July 22, 2004 3:09 PMThe argument would also be more impressive if the author had listed a single foreign policy success by Europe.
Posted by: Annoying Old Guy at July 22, 2004 4:14 PMOJ has a good idea. They could be good cop to our bad cop. The problem is, they more often become the criminal's advocate.
Posted by: Robert Duquette at July 22, 2004 4:24 PM