July 11, 2004

RESPONSIBILITY REQUIRES ACTION:

Spidey Crushes 'Fahrenheit' in 2004 (Frank Rich, 7/11/04, NY Times)

"Fahrenheit 9/11" is, as we keep being told, the most successful non-IMAX documentary of all time. What that means is that its ticket sales are whipping the bejesus out of "Winged Migration" and "Spellbound." But by any other Hollywood standard this movie, while a bona fide surprise hit (especially in relation to its tiny budget), is not a blockbuster or must-see phenomenon (except to its core constituency). Of course, it is pulling in some Republicans, and you can be sure that the sighting of each and every one will be assiduously publicized by Mr. Moore. ("There was a Republican woman in Florida unable to get out of her seat, crying," he told Time.) But with a take of $61 million by the end of its second weekend, "Fahrenheit 9/11" will have to sweat to bring in even a third of the $370 million piled up domestically by the red-state polemic to which its sectarian appeal is most frequently compared, "The Passion of the Christ." If voting at a multiplex box-office constitutes any kind of straw poll, then Mr. Bush has already won re-election. By a landslide. [...]

If you want to find a movie that might give a more accurate reading of the national pulse, it isn't hard to do: just take a look at "Spider-Man 2," which is now on a pace to outdraw Mr. Moore's film and maybe every other film this year — in every conceivable demographic. [...]

This is a world worth saving, but the superhero who can save it is no Superman. He's a bookish nerd racked with guilt and self-doubt. "With great power comes great responsibility" is the central tenet of his faith, passed down not from God but from his Uncle Ben (Cliff Robertson). He takes it seriously. Spider-Man wants to vanquish evil, but he doesn't want to be reckless about it. Like the reluctant sheriff of an old western, he fights back only when a bad guy strikes first, leaving him with no other alternative. He wouldn't mind throwing off his Spider-Man identity entirely to go back to being just Peter Parker, lonely Columbia undergrad. But of course he can't. This is 2004, and there is always evil bearing down on his New York.


It would be a feat of Herculean intellectual dishonesty for Mr. Rich to twist the message of Spider-Man, whose Uncle Ben was killed when he passed up an opportunity to stop evil before it struck his own family, into a coherent argument against pre-emption and in favor of throwing off our superpower identity and going back to being just isolationists, but he does try.

Posted by Orrin Judd at July 11, 2004 9:42 AM
Comments

Just the thought of seeing Michael Moore's body on an IMAX-sized screen was enough to scare the bejeezus out of me this morning...

Posted by: John at July 11, 2004 12:13 PM

If you need a "feat of Herculean intellectual dishonesty," Frank Rich is your guy.

Posted by: Greg Hlatky at July 11, 2004 12:18 PM

Frank Rich may be the most demented man whose work appears in regullarly in print in the non-arabic speaking world.

BTW, if you have not seen Winged Migrations. Go see it. It is a wonderful movie.

Posted by: Robert Schwartz at July 11, 2004 1:34 PM

The theatre I saw Spider Man in must have messed up the reels--I don't remember Spidey waiting for Doc Ock to destroy half of New York before taking him out, as he apparently does in the version Frank Rich saw.

If Saturday Night Live really were "edgy" comedy, they could have a skit where Spider Man goes after Doc Ock, and hands him over to the police, who then send him to court, where clearly Spider Man is the one to blame--he was there when the experiment went haywire, and probably caused it himself. And there was no evidence that Doc Ock was doing anything wrong in his secret lab at all! Of course, the best part of the skit is the portrayal of the newspaper editor who goes after Spidey and even defends Doc Ock--who else but Michael Moore?

Posted by: brian at July 12, 2004 3:31 AM
« EasP: | Main | ADD 1 AND DIVIDE BY 2: »