July 18, 2004
NO PUPPETS, NO POINT:
No Strings Attached: The Thunderbirds are back: they’re younger, with cooler spaceships, bigger effects and no puppets … just don’t tell Gerry Anderson (Graeme Virtue, 7/18/04, Sunday Herald)
[T]hunderbirds director Jonathan Frakes is no stranger to updated 1960s TV shows. Although he’s sat in the big chair for a number of films, he’s still probably best-known as an actor, creating the role of Commander William Riker in Star Trek: The Next Generation, the 1990s respray of Gene Roddenberry’s original space soap that went on to become an enormous success.When Frakes first became attached to the project, he had no knowledge of the source material. “To me, a Thunderbird was just a car, the coolest Ford,” remembers the 51-year-old, “so I was a complete novice until I got a look at all the DVDs of the original show. I thought the tone of it was great fun, it was just a great place to tell a story from. Even though the characters were wooden, you got them, you got that they were a family, you got the relationship between Lady Penelope and Parker. And the visuals, the ships, were fantastic.”
It would be inaccurate to describe this new Thunderbirds as an American production; it was made by Working Title, the British-based company behind Four Weddings And A Funeral and Love, Actually, and filmed at Pinewood studios near London. “There was a British crew, an Irish photography director, Scottish assistant director, an English producer,” explains Frakes. “I was practically the only American there, apart from Paxton and the three kids.”
But a deal was struck with Hollywood studio Universal to help with financing – the film is rumoured to have a budget of around $80m – and it’s clearly been made with an eye on the lucrative US market. The plot sees the grown-up members of International Rescue conveniently stranded on space outpost Thunderbird 5, leaving a surprisingly young Alan Tracy alone to battle The Hood.
“This is more of a prequel,” says Frakes. “Alan Tracy is only 14 and we’ve aged down Tin-Tin, and we’ve also created a new character, Brains’s son. So it’s three young heroes, not unlike Spy Kids or Harry Potter.” [...]
Lady Penelope’s FAB1 – a futuristic 27-foot-long pink runaround – has been a real controversy magnet. In the original series, it was a stately Rolls-Royce with twin machine guns concealed behinds its grille. Unfortunately, the company wouldn’t give permission for a Rolls-Royce to be used in the film, so Parker now drives her ladyship round in a rocket-shaped Ford.
Fans are crying foul, and it was this contentious motor which led to original series creator Gerry Anderson walking away from his painstakingly-negotiated advisory role on the film. Anderson has gone on record to say, “I knew damn well that if I stood in front of that car saying, ‘Isn’t it wonderful!’, there’d be people asking, ‘How much did they pay you, Gerry?’” He’s also refused to promote the film (despite being offered a reported £400,000), has no plans to see it and even demanded that his name be taken off the credits. Pointedly, his current project (a computer-generated TV remake of one of his most famous creations) has the official title Gerry Anderson’s New Captain Scarlet, so “nobody can take it away from me”.
Is it really Thunderbirds without Supermarionation? Posted by Orrin Judd at July 18, 2004 3:47 PM
In the original series, it was a stately Rolls-Royce with twin machine guns concealed behinds its grille. Unfortunately, the company wouldnt give permission for a Rolls-Royce to be used in the film,
I'm often surprised by this kind of short-sighted narrow-mindedness from corporations regarding films. Sure, maybe they don't want their product used by a villain or something, but turning down good, free publicity is just silly. It reminds me that M&M Mars refused permission to Spielberg to use M&Ms in E.T., so he was forced to use Reese's Pieces, an M&M knock-off. Guess whose sales went through the roof after the film came out?
Posted by: PapayaSF at July 18, 2004 4:11 PMCooler spaceships? I find that rather hard to believe. What could be cooler than Thunderbird 2?
Posted by: Tom L at July 18, 2004 4:36 PMOJ:
Thunderbird 4? The submarine? Come on, man, that was the *lamest* Thunderbird of them all. Here's an SAT analogy for you
Thunderbird 4 : The other ships :: Aquaman : The Justice League
Shoot, Thunderbird 6, the Tigermoth was cooler.
Surely you jest. TB4 was a mere accessory, one of many that TB2 carted around. Didn't even have a cool launch sequence -- TB2 just hovered and dropped it in the frickin' water.
Posted by: Tom L at July 18, 2004 5:35 PMAny stinkin' plane can fly--unless it's made in Europe--but one that can submerse too? Way cool.
Posted by: oj at July 18, 2004 5:40 PMI don't care if it gets 1 star, I'm going.
I really don't care about the car, I thought Penny was too young.
Now I find out they're putting back the timeline.
Posted by: Sandy P at July 18, 2004 7:45 PMDo you guys know that reruns of Thunderbirds are shown on TechTV?
Posted by: Vince at July 19, 2004 12:06 AMGovernor Breck:
I dunno, Hawkman or the Green Arrow could give Aquaman competition for "Least Effective Member of the JLA".
Posted by: Michael Herdegen at July 19, 2004 2:35 AMYou guys almost make me wish I'd seen the show.
Posted by: Annoying Old Guy at July 19, 2004 10:11 AMAOG:
I've got the dvds if you've got a twelve pack of Bud and a bag of cheez-waffles...
Posted by: oj at July 19, 2004 10:30 AM